Woe are we that Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban are together. We are so jealous of the power couple that we spend all of our time thinking up ways to insult them on this blog. We have so much envy for Nicole Kidman that we can't see straight and we aren't really fans of Keith Urban's because we don't support how he chooses to live his life. Time to clear up the mess in the New Year yet again.
The above paragraph shows some of the accusations thrown out at this blog from time to time. To those all we can say is: please read the blog. Yes, we have been clear we don't like Kidman. But not liking and actively setting out to destroy her are two very different things. No one who writes these blogs, and, yes, there are multiple writers, is out to destroy her. Actually, she is doing a fine job all by herself. Why aren't we public about who we are? Because it doesn't matter who we are. There is enough out there about Kidman that we don't need to sign off on our work here. Kidman basically writes the blog herself by opening her stupid mouth or living her life in the spotlights. She chose to open her life up to scrutiny and, well that's just the way it is. For that one person who thinks we work for Kidman and this blog is basically a way that she can get more attention for herself and that we are under her wing - the answer to that is no way in hell does anyone here work for that woman; we heard she doesn't pay very well.
Jealous of the power couple? Jealous of what? Who would really want to live her life? She is so boring. She gets coffee, goes to the gym, goes shopping, watches a lot of television and smokes like a chimney. She and Keith? Well if an overheard conversation in a Nashville restaurant is any indication then sign me up for that MENSA challenge. Keith sitting there reading his paper Nicole drinking her tea and not one word exchanged between the two in 20 minutes, except when Keith said to her “Are you ready?”, stood up and waited for her to go out the door in front of him. That is a stimulating marriage?
On the question of the old stand by ‘you aren't really fans of his because you don't support his choices’, there are many issues and causes that a number of performers actively support; if we as fans don't support those that makes us less a fan? No. We are actually fans of Keith Urban, but this is not a blog specifically about him; it’s about his public marriage and his disastrous choice for a wife. I, for one, can still listen to Be Here or Golden Road and enjoy them, but that can't be said about Love Pain and the Whole Crazy Thing. He tied so many of those songs to the wife he has spoiled their appeal. Does that mean we won't listen to his music again? Actually the few snippets of songs that have been released sound pretty good and as long as he keeps his mouth shut about the wife, we may be able to stomach the new CD.
Just like most of you, we too, have very active lives and other things going on beyond this blog. Too bad we can't say that about Kidman. But it’s still enjoyable to catch Kidman being Kidman and Keith being strung along. When it isn't fun anymore we will be gone.
The above paragraph shows some of the accusations thrown out at this blog from time to time. To those all we can say is: please read the blog. Yes, we have been clear we don't like Kidman. But not liking and actively setting out to destroy her are two very different things. No one who writes these blogs, and, yes, there are multiple writers, is out to destroy her. Actually, she is doing a fine job all by herself. Why aren't we public about who we are? Because it doesn't matter who we are. There is enough out there about Kidman that we don't need to sign off on our work here. Kidman basically writes the blog herself by opening her stupid mouth or living her life in the spotlights. She chose to open her life up to scrutiny and, well that's just the way it is. For that one person who thinks we work for Kidman and this blog is basically a way that she can get more attention for herself and that we are under her wing - the answer to that is no way in hell does anyone here work for that woman; we heard she doesn't pay very well.
Jealous of the power couple? Jealous of what? Who would really want to live her life? She is so boring. She gets coffee, goes to the gym, goes shopping, watches a lot of television and smokes like a chimney. She and Keith? Well if an overheard conversation in a Nashville restaurant is any indication then sign me up for that MENSA challenge. Keith sitting there reading his paper Nicole drinking her tea and not one word exchanged between the two in 20 minutes, except when Keith said to her “Are you ready?”, stood up and waited for her to go out the door in front of him. That is a stimulating marriage?
On the question of the old stand by ‘you aren't really fans of his because you don't support his choices’, there are many issues and causes that a number of performers actively support; if we as fans don't support those that makes us less a fan? No. We are actually fans of Keith Urban, but this is not a blog specifically about him; it’s about his public marriage and his disastrous choice for a wife. I, for one, can still listen to Be Here or Golden Road and enjoy them, but that can't be said about Love Pain and the Whole Crazy Thing. He tied so many of those songs to the wife he has spoiled their appeal. Does that mean we won't listen to his music again? Actually the few snippets of songs that have been released sound pretty good and as long as he keeps his mouth shut about the wife, we may be able to stomach the new CD.
Just like most of you, we too, have very active lives and other things going on beyond this blog. Too bad we can't say that about Kidman. But it’s still enjoyable to catch Kidman being Kidman and Keith being strung along. When it isn't fun anymore we will be gone.
80 comments:
Hey, umyths?
Marry me!
All of you, even!
xoxo,
A440
Wow you are a little person.
Wow you are a little person.
Wow you are a little person.
Wow you are a little person.
Wow you are a little person.
"Hey aren't you?" There have been a rash of sightings and I use the term rash here as a caution to all people to not engage in unprotected sex with workers of the sex industry. Anyway, the rash of sightings took place over a two day period. Who was being seen and what were they doing? Well it turns out this A list country singer might have been enjoying the absence of his wife because for two days there were sightings of our singer picking up women who make their living on the streets. At least three times over a 48 hour period our singer cruised around in his very recognizable car and picked up women for about 20 minutes of fun. Now, I don't know if he was just not getting any at home or if he wanted to give his wife a very special Christmas present that could not be returned.
Entertainment Lawyer Blind Item
Kidman basically writes the blog herself by opening her stupid mouth or living her life in the spotlights.
Then why bother having this blog at all? The real answer is YOU want to bash and trash because YOU can. It's all about YOU and your negativity.
Why aren't we public about who we are? Because it doesn't matter who we are. There is enough out there about Kidman that we don't need to sign off on our work here.
No one has asked you to go public. But not using screen names where your identity would still be secret (when you claim you have multiple writers) is just a tactic to confuse and manipulate. How hard can it be to come up with names...Skeptic 1, Skeptic 2. If the haters over at E! can come up with multiple screen names and use them to post in the same day surely you could at least come up with one each. I haven't seen another blog, no matter how trivial, deny its readers the courtesy of showing who believes what. Say whatever you want but we know its intentional.
Personnally, I just skip over the RC comments. For what ever reason, RC is on the side of Kidman and will not budge. Therefore attacking anything anti-Kidman, even when justified is not in her book. I personally have not or ever been a fan of Kidman, only of Kieth. All I can say...is that since she has come onboard, Keith Urban seems to have disappeard. That to me is not love or a fruitfull realationship on either side! Actions still do speak louder than words! And actions from both parties scream "WE REALLY DO HATE EACH OTHER...ALL OF THIS IS FOR YOU, THE PUBLIC'S BENEFIT!!!!!"
And poor little Sunday Rose is caught in the middle of this mud slide. The saddest piece of this puzzle in-deed!
stillhopefull-I do the same thing with regard to RC's comments. Not worth my time to read them. If you've wasted time by reading one then you have read them all anyway, so no bother...
As for being jealous of kidman...not a snowballs chance in hell!!
Still a fan of Keith's? Well so far. Time will tell...
Yes, it's hilarious the kidman fansies are not happy campers right now...but...Australia is grossing well in....peru...and ecuador...
http://www.myparkmag.co.uk/articles/celebrity/nicole-kidmans-australia-squirm.html
Nicole Kidman's Australia 'squirm'
Thursday, 8 January 2009
Nicole Kidman isn't "proud" of her performance in 'Australia'.
The 41-year-old actress has revealed she "squirmed" in her seat throughout the Sydney premiere because she was so uncomfortable watching herself on screen.
She said: "I can't look at this movie and be proud of what I've done. I sat there, and I looked at Keith and went, 'Am I any good in this movie?' But I thought Brandon Walters and Hugh Jackman were wonderful. It's just impossible for me to connect to it emotionally at all."
Nicole was so nervous about her performance she fled Australia as soon as the premiere was over with husband Keith Urban and their five-month-old daughter Sunday Rose.
She told Australian radio station 2dayFM: "We ran because I didn't want to read anything. I didn't want to know. I saw my sister and my family and we saw Keith's family and then we were straight on a plane."
Nicole added she only attended the premiere to please the film's director Baz Luhrmann.
She said: "I don't usually see my films, but because of Baz I had to see it. I saw 'Moulin Rouge'. I've really only seen that and this in my whole career. It gets worse as I get older."
HEHE.. no wonder she is laying so low..
Does it really matter why UM's have this blog? You read here, you post here, what is the frigging problem?
If you have it all figured out, then good for you, applause, applause. We have heard your whining over and over again. If you don't like what you read, then don't read it. Simple. If you are still trying to turn people in your direction, why not make a blog of your own and try to lure them to the other side.
I know you are trying to distract and irritate people (and yes it does work sometimes) but the skeptics, or semi-skeptics or the I -don't- know -what- I -am- but -don't- like -Nicole- people, aren't going to leave just because you think they should. (Unless of course they don't have anymore interest, then sure)
But thinking you know that there is only one poster, has made many of us laugh because I can say I am one poster, and I know of a few others who post, so you are WRONG.
Sorry.
Now that I added my two cents, I am going to get back to reading, deciding for myself what is real or not, and post when the need be.
It really makes no difference how many people make up this blog. Seems to me it is all in the power of the people deceiding on what to believe from the posts. It is their decesion on if they want to come back again and view the new posts. I really don't think it takes rocket science to figure that out. Only some common sense is necessary. If you really think these comments are totally out of this world and UM is wacko, why come back? It seems that they just like to argue for the sake of arguing. The sky is blue...no it is black...no it is white...Nicole is natural...no she is full of botox...no that is just aging, everyone's lips get bigger with age! Common sense is all that is necessary!
Can't you tell by the writing styles there is more than one person posting on this site?
Gees. . .sign me up for THAT MENSA challenge, and I thank you UM for the b-day laugh that provided.
Hoosierlady, Happy Birthday!!!! We're happy you are here!
A440, we accept! We're happy you are here, too!
To the writer of this blog, I am not a bunny or a member of NKU and nor do I like the union of Kidman and Urban, but I have a question. Is the person who overheard this conversation, the same person who saw Urban pick up three hookers in his Mustang?
Hello ShutUp&Sing.
Further to Nicole's admission on her rancid performance in Australia - Have the press forgotten that Sunday Rose stayed back in Nashville during the Sydney Premiere?
Also, I hope Nicole has seen the results of my latest Poll. Botox is an additional factor in her poor performance:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/01/nic-picks-at-her-performance.html
Do you believe the hookers in the car thing? I mean come on. . . if you were rich and wanted a little something wouldn't you have it delivered?
to Hoosierlady- yes I believe the hooker story... Keith does stupid reckless things and he is cheap.
to amandapornstar- who said it was the same person who saw the country singer? Who said it was his Mustang?
On the Crazy Days & Crazy Nights blog, Urban Myths was the one to point out that Urban used his Mustang in his new video. I am assuming since this is Urban Myths, they believe that it was Urban's Mustang used to pick up the hookers.
The comment was, quote:
Urban's got a recently purchased mustang that is featured in his soon to be released video for "Sweet Thing"...
That is a statement of fact. Assume whatever you want.
He's trying to get ppl off his Hummer so he can have more of a *ahem* private life. If he wasnt such an idiot, he would have dropped the Hummer a long time ago. Or at least get some other vehicles.
Urban no longer has the Hummer - he got rid of it before dating Kidman.
or *the Bentley* However you need it.
Wait a minute, there's no way he got rid of that hummer prior to "dating" NK. Check your facts!!
No, check your facts! The Hummer was sold in an auction. He had a black Denali when he met Kidman. There are pictures of the two of them together in the Denali when they were "just friends"
Lisa yes he did get rid of the hummer long before Kidman came. He got rid of it before the Denali(sp). That was the first SUV that we saw Kidman riding around in. Then right before they got married she got the Bentley. They still have the Bentley, but I think it is hers. When Keith is out by himself he uses the Mustang.
How could he have gotten rid of the Hummer when I've seen him in it myself 4 times AFTER they were "dating"? And the Denali wasnt even his, read the license plate on the pics you are looking at.
Funny stuff from ppl who dont live remotely anywhere near where all the stuff happens.
It's common to see artists in Nashville driving vehicles from auto services. It's one of the local perks. The black denali you are speaking from was just that.
I dont know if he STILL owns the Hummer today but I know he definitely had it after they were supposedly dating.
Not jealous? This reads like a 15 year olds diary.
"Jealous of what? Who would really want to live her life? She is so boring. She gets coffee, goes to the gym, goes shopping, watches a lot of television and smokes like a chimney. She and Keith? Well if an overheard conversation in a Nashville restaurant is any indication then sign me up for that MENSA challenge. Keith sitting there reading his paper Nicole drinking her tea and not one word exchanged between the two in 20 minutes, except when Keith said to her “Are you ready?”, stood up and waited for her to go out the door in front of him. That is a stimulating marriage?"
Love and marriage isn't all making out in the back seat, kids. But just a question: if you still like the music and the shows, what does it matter who the man is married too? How does is affect you?
Lisa, Keith bought the Denali in Feb 05. He drove it through the summer, up to and including when he first hung with Nicole. The gold Hummer was stored in the garage.
"Funny stuff from ppl who dont live remotely anywhere near where all the stuff happens."
And you know where I live?
If I remember right, didn't Keith sign the Hummer for the women that bought it? When she sold it she took the autograph out when she resold it. I remember reading an article about that.
Well then you better tell Keith that the Denali wasn't his, because he said it was.
No I don't live in Nashville, but that doesn't mean I don't know!!!! It really doesn't matter any way. He drive the Mustang and the Bentley now. It is a big shame he doesn't get to drive his bikes. That is what his real passion was to get out in the community and ride his bikes.
I bet he rides in the Spring. The weather right now is not really conducive to riding.
I heard Keith uses a ghost writer to write songs because songwriting isn't his greatest skill (unlike guitar playing). Any truth in that?
The Hummer was sold. In fact it was listed on eBay.
No there isn't Choice. Keith has said that writing lyrics is not his strong suit, but he does alot of co-writing, which is common in Nashville. A small portion of his released songs have been ones he's written alone.
This must be the follow-up to the rumor Keith doesn't do his own guitar playing. Yes, there has been that rumor.
OMG..they must have never seen him in concert..lol
Yes I saw a pic of the hummer when it was up for auction. And I saw the Denali listed on the auto dealers website. It either said it was owned by a famous country artist or they may have even mentioned KU's name. I can't remember now.
Well, kidman may be hiding out in Tenn. after a few xmas photo ops out to lunch and at xmas mass...but the cyber space "squirming kidman" is positively flaming out the intertubes with the virilablity of her own words. About 2 to 3 pages of a google search has kidman knocking her own film...whether every re telling is completely accurate... her next movie poster may as well come with an exclaimer.. "WARNING: THIS MOVIE IS PROBABLY UNWATCHABLE ACCORDING TO THE STAR OF THE MOVIE!" You know, actors have said in interviews that they dont always or ever watch themselves in their films...but you would think with kidman's shakey BO performances and suspicions of being "box office poison"...she may have kept that to herself...but I always make the point that kidman is really bad at PR despite going through the usual motions...her vapid magazine interviews...her incoherant tv show interviews...(ie; letterman ). Here botox eyebrows and fishstick lips were never...and will never be...a positive move by her...but I expect it to continue to be front and center...and always out there to be a very noticable reminder of how off the track she has gone. Surely people who are of the thought that one aspect of "acting"...and most certainly above the highest consideration among too many ill advised celebs that...as billy crystal's "Fernando Lamas" would say, "It is far better to look good than to feel good"... is that you should be able to emote passion...or anger... or terror...or just simple happiness. Kidman is just very lucky we are well into the "talkies" stage of cinema...and not in the age of silent film...for kidman would not only be unable to "emote" but she would have long ago been for most certainly....literally and actually...rendered "mute"...
Good analysis Mclean. I agree that in this anti-Kidman climate, Granny perhaps should not have mentioned her inferior acting. But it just confirms how dumb she is, not the sharpest tool in the shed (as they say). It's almost as if she is trying to agree with the public so they will feel sorry for her.
The new lips have just added more stuff for people to criticise too. As I was saying after seeing the film, the lips totally turned us off the second half. They seemed to get bigger (just like in that Jim Carrey video you posted on my Blog).
Nicole does not seem to realise the laughing stock she has become. She once had public admiration only to lose it all by being so dumb.
The lips just crack me up the most. They are the best thing since sliced bread. Mine are arriving tomorrow by post (self injection):
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/01/read-my-lips.html
"It's almost as if she is trying to agree with the public so they will feel sorry for her."
I think you hit the nail on the head there Choice. She's laying the groundwork for the sympathy vote. If she can admit to not liking her own performance then people start to see her in a new light and the forgiveness begins.
Notachance, it is so typical of Gran to do something like this. Her PR machine is back to business.
Have you noticed she's happy though to keep her salary for this lousy performance? Why not return 95% of it as a way of gaining some true support. Perhaps a charity would be pleased to take those earnings.
Well then choice, she'd actually have to GIVE the money to them rather than just lending her face and fame to promote the cause. Which would be a much better deal for the charity!!
Choice said...
"Good analysis Mclean. I agree that in this anti-Kidman climate, Granny perhaps should not have mentioned her inferior acting. But it just confirms how dumb she is, not the sharpest tool in the shed (as they say)."
Well, choice, Urban Myths post title pretty much says it all...
"Jealous? No, just smarter than Nicole Kidman..."
...and the fact of the matter, kidman has a huge credibility gap, helped in part by quotes from this interview. But what she also now suffers from is complete transparency...in that the PR spin she attempts to weave that she hopes will help her image falls flat to the public and the quotes she mindlessly lets out seemingly unaware of their true transparency of probable truth...ie; she cant watch her films...she doesnt read the script and simply chooses a film based on the director...can be used to criticize her. The cruise pity card is so played out...the new marriage...the new baby havent helped her "interest" factor...all that's left is what is on the screen...and there is not much of an audience for that...so hence explains the pile on...
Just think if Mrs. Smith would have been nikkers instead of angie, there would be no brangelina. omg, well we really cannot say for sure, can we?
As I have been perusing this wonderful blog, I must say that a few conincidences have become crystal clear to me.
Notachance right on on observation of our nikkers, admitting your wrong to make a right and win sympathy, poor nikkers.
Oh, I almost forgot please Keith practice safe sex with your newfound passengers from the street. Some of them are not "safety girls" as they should be.
The hummer was too conspicuous for nikkers, she likes that bentley babe id.
Wisperings lately are so coming true. There is trouble in paradise in more ways than l. Rumblings of mr. kidman not liking or wanting to be Mr. Love my fans is starting to rare its ugly face. Pouting and cowering in the corner before a m & g are starting to be known of. Hence, no eoty. Mrs. Kidman is so happy with this she is willing to admit her screwup still even more.
Aren't women who have babies boobs supoose to get somewhat "brown" in the nip area?
Thanks "keith" but the whisperings you're hearing are coming from the little voices inside your tiny head. There's no trouble in paradise at all. Keith is a happy camper these days, despite your sad attempts at starting rumors on blogs. Oh and I've had 3 kids and my "nips" aren't somewhat "brown" at all. Get a life. Keith's got one and he could care less if a few dozen old women who are bored with their own life don't like his wife.
BrentwoodBabe, you sound totally hooked into Keith and NK's fairytale life. So...Keith got one brown nipple, say you. I must say that's news to me. You have really openned my eyes up.
Aren't you all forgetting that Granny had her boobs botoxed too so they don't move either? Does anyone really believe she would breast feed anyway. I so doubt it, especially when someone else gave birth to it.
Not a nipple Imahick, a life. Something you might try getting. Not a fairytale, a reality like Mr and Mrs Keith Urban have. The only fairytales are the wicked ones you menopausal women create. Thanks for proving what a bunch of dimwits you are.
And you're welcome to leave any time you want, "Babe."
(signed)
a pre-menopausal
A440
Why is everyone so obsessed with our cycles?
BrentwoodBabe, you are a very angry and ill intentioned person. You should try some therapy. I think it would help you a great deal to feel better about yourself and your idol, NK.
I think your anger is being displaced toward me, because your queen, NK, has fallen, and hard. She is being laughed at world wide because her face is frozen ahd distorted by cosmetic procedures, and she still pretends she's all natural. They laugh at her because she's a one dimensional actress trying to portray characters with far too much depth for her limited range. No one holds you accountable for her decline, Brentwood. You should try to get hold of your pain and hate and channel it to a more productive place...like worshipping someone who can actually act. (or if you could dig down deep, to a charity, unlike your queen, some of us actually DO more than talk about our causes)
I find it always very humorous when the righteous, like yourself Brentwood, come on here and lash out at the other posters, accusing us of having no life. Strangely, you are obviously in the same boat as us. I'm just visiting a blog that I find entertaining and having some fun. You, on the other hand, are way too involved.
Brentwood...step away from the keyboard, take 3 cleansing breaths and click on another site...why not visit the worship site and thank someone for finding a positive article about NK. You know that they had to work VERY hard to find something good about her.
A positive article about Kidman? Aren't those hard to find these days? Instead, BrentwoodBabe [can she really call herself that], should mix up a new batch of Kool-Aid!
'a life. Something you might try getting'
funny, I thought you had and your friend had already gotten a new one........hmmmmmmmmmmmm, same old, same old.........LOL!!!
Ha! What ridiculous and annoying pansies the kidman fansie's are capable of being. So how can you tell when the negative and derogatory stories on kidman have gotten to a point of career crushing levels? When the fansies are now attacking kidman photo op leak source justjared...it seems in this posting today...
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/01/11/nicole-kidman-sunday-rose-checkup/
Nicole Kidman: Sunday Rose Check-Up!
...JJ repeats the story of kidman's quotes of squirming at watching herself in her own films...which then prompts this comment by a... "Quote, IN CONTEXT"...(yes, fellow urban mythbusters, an annoying kidman parasite we are all very familar with...go to NK"S Forehead's latest posting by Anna, and read the exact same comments )...
...quote
..."Tsk tsk… once again, Jared did not do any fact-check.
Here’s the radio interview: http://www.2dayfm.com.au/entertainment/galleries/australia_premiere (segment called “Nicole Kidman on That Baby Bump")
Here’s a writer who obviously has listened to the interview and gets it: http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/la-dispatch-the-perils-of-candor/"
...the exact same comment copied and pasted on both sites...but under different usernames...but believe me, asinine posts from a celeb loving parasite is very recognizable...even on the vast and enormous plane of the internets! I just found it highy ridiculous and hugely hilarious... come on you kidman fansie parasites...be original...dont just copy and paste the same comments from site to site! Have a thought of your own....
So, I just watched a repeat of the critics choice awards...and as the golden globes are about set to begin in awhile...so when kidman was shut out of noms, so far, i was pretty sure she would get herself onto the show as a presenter. Well, it seems she didnt...and then I wondered if she would wait for the oscars...again if no nom, which is likely...then on the presenters list? I dont get into all the oscar hype of who will be nominated or who will win...but I do watch...just to check out who wins. But it is a major annoyance when kidman keeps getting involved when she hasnt been nominated for anything...yes...it's a personal thing for me...other actors appear without noms..yada yada. Let's just hope kidman is too disenchanted enough with the obvious flop of not just her movie, but also of her career....to not try and crash the awards...as tempting I'm sure of her need to be in the limelight and red carpet...
I have been watching the Golden Globes. Kate Winslet won Best Supporting Actress for THE READER. I bet that burns NK's butt. But the reality is, if she had taken that role, the movie would have flopped and she would never have been nominated, let alone win.
Poor NK. I wonder how the "coulda / shoulda" feels? Duck Keith, duck.
Hi Maclen,
We all know how much Granny Freeze loves to be in the spotlight. I am hoping she won't turn up to the oscars to present, because I can do without her awful laugh and embarrasment to fellow Australians.
Talking about spotlight. Ever wondered why she prefers short men?
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-women-prefer-shorter-men-and-short.html
imahick said
I have been watching the Golden Globes. Kate Winslet won Best Supporting Actress for THE READER. I bet that burns NK's butt. But the reality is, if she had taken that role, the movie would have flopped and she would never have been nominated, let alone win.
I agree. But more important, what do the Weinsteins think of Winslet's win -- her double win, actually? It was Winslet who saved their movie. Winslet looks to become the Weinsteins go-to actress.
Adios, Nicole.
I'm betting that NK does take a step back, on the guise of "just wanting to be a mum", in order to save face (lol) from any future acting blunders on her part. She hasn't wanted to portray an age appropriate part and she is at that age where she needs to - to define the next chapter of her acting career. I think she should be gone for a few years, take some serious acting lessons, and then try to make her comeback in a part for a woman.
BrentwoodBabe, I would say don't put any stock into what the skeptics here are saying but I am sure you don't need my advice. They pull out the same schtick. You need help for your issues and idolotry of NK. No one can be just a real and true fan, they have to be "idol-worshipers". Let them think that to make themselves feel better :)
maclen, no creativity needed here. That quote has been taken out of context everywhere, plain and simple, and this blog knows it.
As for "The Reader" its not the success all of you think it is. $40 million budget with only a 5.5 million gross in the US. That's a flop for a Kidman movie but I guess for anyone else that's a success. It's gone down to only 2 night showings where I live. Many people have walked out on this film. Ive read reports online and it happened at the showing I went to as well. There is much more in your face sex and nudity than any Nicole Kidman film I can recall. And a bathtub scene to boot. But Winslet is a great actress and not a pervert so it is okay. If Nicole had been in the film and won you all would be saying she's been awarded for being a sexual deviant. LMAO
At least the actor that Kate had to perform these acts with was 18 years old. She didn't mess with the mind of a 10 year-old boy like Kidman did.
Yes and they waited till his 18th birthday and did the scenes on the exact day. Kidman doing the same thing would be crucified. And if you've actually seen "Birth" you know she didn't perform OR simulate any sexual acts with the boy. Somehow here Kidman always the exception to everyone elses standards.
And on a more positive note Brad and Keith are #1 on Billboard with "Start A Band". Go ahead and say that the only reason Keith is number one is because of Brad. You aren't going to rain on the parade. Congrats to both of them!
Kidman even said in an interview that they messed with the 10 year-old's mind.
Did Keith pick out the song? Did he do any of the producing? In other words, did Keith get his hands dirty with this song? Nope. It's Brad's song with a collaboration with Keith - period. Besides, all of Brad's songs seem to be reaching #1 lately, unlike Keth. Hence the awards going to Brad now!
Yes, Keith was the guest on Brad's record - lucky for Keith something magical occured that day with that collaboration. While Keith looks like he's having fun in the video, we all know that fun and funny videos are what Brad's known for.
I give the credit to BP with a dash of KU.
You bring up an excellent point notachance. Keith can't compete in the video category with Brad. Yes, his earlier videos were great, but the videos from the Painful album were . . . well . . . painful compared to Brad's. I have never been disappointed with one of his videos.
Notachance, do you know something or someone we do not know? Story broke today about our kiki wanting our nikkers to have another baby asap. Kiki is desperate to give Beautiful Sunday Rose a brother or sister.
Being a father helped him conquer his demons. Wonderful news, realizing that not worshipping at the nikkers alter was not your savior. Working your 12 step program and practicing HALT is what keeps you clean, sober, and happy.
Congrats to Kate Winslet for your two fisted win at the gg's last night. See, bb, other actresses can win awards by being "natural" too.
more good news in our "wonderful world".
Ooh they sure jump to defend their hateful actions, don't they Reality Check? LMAO! The reality is these middle aged witches don't want to get back to the reality of their sad, boring little lives. Keith Urban was their little fantasy. They left their families and traveled from concert to concert, pretending they were young and hot. They hung around the buses and giggled. They got meet and greets so Keith would notice them. They're a joke. They're so jealous of Nicole Kidman because she took their little fantasy life away from them They've got nothing left but their fat husbands and kids and a trailer in the middle of nowhere.
Imahick, you need serious help because you're delusional. Your jealousy, envy and hatred for someone whose life doesn't affect you is very unhealthy. What I find always very humorous though is when the liars like yourself Imahick, come on here and say you're just visiting when in reality, you're one of the moderators of the site this blog comes from. You're one of the illiterates who posts on the E board day after day after day. At least your honest about your name.
Wow...you are a truly angry person, Brentwood. I tell you what. You go get a psych assessment and so will I. Then we'll see who needs help. I've rarely seen responses with such vitreol and hatred toward other posters. It's far more than what people post about NK...certainly beyond anything I've ever posted in a public forum.
I'm not the one calling ANYONE illiterate, jealous, or a liar.
I am not a constant poster on E, but I do make the occasional comment. I think if you read my content, you'd find that I'm one of the more moderate posters. I've never said I hate NK. I don't go on public boards and call her names. Unlike yourself, who seems to think that's OK for you, but some kind of hate crime for someone else.
Again, I truly think this is too much for you. You should just step away from the key board, and cool off. It's posts like yours that make me realize what crazies NK has as fans.
WOW! BB couldn't be further from the mark with imahick - whom I consider to be one of the more reasonable skeptics around here.
Brentwood- If you are that angry at a poster who is very middle of the road well something seems off.
Did you read the blog at all or for that matter any of the blogs? Seems that so many of the happy campers in Nicoleworld are having trouble dealing with the reality that everyone seems to be on to her these days. We understand.
As for the whole middle aged jealous bitch thing... Keith Urban should be so lucky.
Lainey has a post this morning that I was already certain was going on with kidman...
http://www.laineygossip.com/Nicole_Kidman_hides_out_in_Nashville_from_embarrassment_over_failure_of_Australia.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0
The Freeze retreats
..her film did in fact bomb at the box office...and it was totally blanked in the awards season. Kidman, just as her fansies were stunned after the huge failure of her film on all sides, (the silence on this blog for instance was deafening after the release of her film!)...is now hiding out in Tenn...and the photo ops certainly reveal the level of "energy" left in kidman...or the lack thereof. The photo ops of kdiman taking her baby for a check up reveals a totally bummed failed actress who no doubt would prefer to be on the red carpets of the awards shows...and certainly a face that is pondering the hohum and the doldrums of "everyday life down on the farm".
Hi Mclean -
Interesting UK article that Lainey refers to. Is Ozstralia still considered a flop because if failed in US and the UK? I read on Box Office Mojo that it has made $130m worldwide (which matches production costs). Yet does that take into account the cut that the cinemas take? IMO, it is still a FLOP because it failed in these two key regions, but what's your take? Plus Granny more or less admitted it was a dud.
Have you see her new comeback film:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/01/nicoles-comeback-film.html
Cheers, Choice
Hi Mclean -
"Interesting UK article that Lainey refers to. Is Ozstralia still considered a flop because if failed in US and the UK? I read on Box Office Mojo that it has made $130m worldwide (which matches production costs)."
Well, choice, it's just not theater shares...but just don't forget the studio's budget for promo... which for this film, which cost $130 mil, the promo cost's would probably be around $20-$30 mil. You know just as the fansies like to point out that the film studio "only" spent about $80mil with the Oz government paying the balance... for a movie that was made with $130 mil combined to only gross around $130 mil... even on paper doesnt look good. So the oz government spent $50 mil...Fox spent 80 mil, plus spent, lets say only $20 mil on promo...that's $150 mil total cost of this film...as of right now, over a month in release, the film is still at a loss. Just as the fansies like to point out that golden compass made a ton in "international" grosses... of course fail to mention that the studio, in an act of no confidence in this film, sold off all of their international rights to the film, so New Line didnt see a penny of those "international" grosses...which is why new line is no more!
Thanks Mclean,
Alot of the fansies posters on IMDB claim it is not a flop because it has amde $130m. But of course they have not taken into account all those extra costs you listed.
I'd forgotten about the $40m spent on international commercials. As for how much cinema's take, it apparently depends on the country. SOme take 50%, others less.
I guess we can say that Australia has not made back its production costs. Even if it had, I still call it a flop because 70% of it was unbearable to watch.
Yeah, choice, kdiman is bad for business...and also very very bad at PR... here's another hilarious example...
http://www.babble.com.au/2009/01/14/nicole-kidmans-fashion-faux-pas/
Nicole Kidman’s Fashion Faux-pas
...after those baby check up photo ops...kidman made a starbucks stop in a food store...and as is so noticable...you can, as they say, determine her "religion"... and as I mentioned earlier, she looks far more happier and cheerful carrying her fix of java than she did carrying her kid. Her "dresser" must be off the clock these days...
Maclen - That Starbucks photo is her way of finally putting the hermaphrodite rumour to rest. Every stance is a PR opportunity for Gran, remember.
Wow Brentwoodbimbo~ You sure are fixated on everyone being dumpy, middle aged and menopausal LOL
I am none of those things..But wouldn't your idol Kidman, be one ya fuckin dumbass!
Post a Comment