HA! I find it the highest of "high-larity" that it is no longer even a question of...yes or no? But it is now... does this weeks procedure makes her look "freakish or not?" For of course, her lips in fact, have looked worse! As this update at Awful Plastic surgury clearly points out...
Ahhhh...so there is an update to the "drunken kidman" "not" posted over at NKU that I commented on yesterday. Well, it would seem my buddys over at NKU thought that they could pull a fast one! It seems today, "it turns out that in fact in this thread they did post the photos...here...
...it "appears" that, if you look at comment #1...it is a link to pics over at Getty images of a dazed and amazed kidman stumbling in the streets...
"Just little pictures http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.a...=Entertainment#
and then comment #2 says...
"thanks carole"
...and then comment #3 says...
"Thanks! Ciao"
...but when I checked the site on the 16th, before I posted my comment request to timtam to explain why they "hadnt" posted the photos... I didnt recall seeing those first 3 comments posted on that thread of said drunken kidman photos! Well...if you go here...
...to this Google's "cache" of the same page... Those first 3 comments that now appear today...DID NOT EXIST yesterday, Nov 16, 2009 21:20:39 GMT! So, it would appear, dear readers, that after my comment about how the NKUsers were in shame over those drunken kidman pics and wouldnt post them out of embarrassment...they tried to slip in those comments...after the fact!! Boy, how desperate can some people be? Well, in this case, rather lamely desperate!
Hee hee! So, for my latest edition of (dramatic music!) "Late Night Musings"...I'd like to do my best imitation of Detective Columbo...
...and now, I'd like to present, in the case of the "NKUSers tampering with the evidence", new evidence that they in fact...had modified...altered...changed... their own thread to make it "appear" that they in fact had posted the pics of a sloshed stumbling, bumbling kidman in the PUBLIC thread of their fansie site after I had challenged them on it! If you will kindly look at the first 3 comments posted at thepublic thread "Keith And Nicole Out At Night In Nyc ,15 Nov 2009"...here...
"Just little pictures http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.a...=Entertainment#"
#2-nic&keithNov 16 2009, 06:21 PM
"thanks carole"
#3-Samantha StevensNov 16 2009, 06:59 PM
"Thanks! Ciao"
...these exact and precise comments were in fact...COPIED...word for word...time for time...from their true and original posting...which was....HERE!...
... and then pasted them onto the starting end of the "public" thread! Yes, the first three comments that "suddenly" appeared at the beginning of the "public" "Keith And Nicole Out At Night In Nyc ,15 Nov 2009" thread yesterday were in fact the first three comments "originally" posted in the "Private members only" thread, "Nic New York Candids!" And someone, very foolishly believed that they could just "slip them in" and make it "appear" that they were not in fact "ashamed" to speak of them in "public." Well, they'll have to get up prety early in the....well you know the rest...So it seems a little questioning is all that is needed to get a little transparancy...and just a little bit of "deductive thinking", eh? "well done Sherlock holmes! oh wait...I'm columbo tonight, right? Yeah, "Excuse me, pardon me?
Geez maclen, just think of all the good you could do in this world if you only spent all that time on something worthwhile. Seriously? You are piecing together evidence of fraud on NKU? I would think the only shame here is on you.
well, it can't be denied any longer, really ... for so long people have said it is just 'plumping lipstick' ... and people who called her out on it were called "haters" ... she is kindov between a rock and a hard place as her original smile shows a lot of gum which i can imagine Hollywood didn't like, especially now that she is "happy" and smiles a lot more ... but then, the repair job looks just so awful I don't know which would have been better ... methinks what God gave her! I think she should have had the op to shorten her top jaw. Someone i knew who showed no teeth when she smiled so had hers lengthened: scary thought but effective in the end. What really is biting Nicole in the bum is that she denied it all: THAT is what people "hate": the dishonesty.
It comes down to this she is a sad insecure woman who has got what she wanted because of the men in her life be it daddy or Mr. Cruise or any of the number of lovers she has had and now her insignificant husband is starting to pull ahead of her, the realization is there that she has no control so it appears she is trying to control what she thinks she can- her looks, her image. She has lost her career. Problem is she is a less than talented, aging actress who isn't interesting not even for her beauty any longer.
And of course, you can also clearly notice in the series of photos of kidman through the years...is how her "nose" has narrowed and elongated from the procedures... and of course the cheek implants. Of course, what I found interesting is how the "freakish lips" story came out so quickly, on the heels of the kidman "ultra busty" knocks in the press. Especially, as I mentioned, her lips have looked worse than they did at the CMAs. Yet her bust, and especially at the CMA's, actually did look "freakishly big" in comparison to her less than as bulging recent look. But as kidman's soooo "logical explaination" of her "busty look" being a result of having a baby...16 months ago!...I figure the breast comments were an especially sensitive topic for inept team kidman...and the "freakish lips" story, which they just simply ignore anyways...was the lesser of two evils!
So, kidman is now attempting to "backtrack" on her "strange sexual fetish stuff" qoute from the british GQ piece...(her "people must have read Urban Myths!) Seems kidman told Access Hollywood...
"But according to Nicole, the quote was related to her work on the big screen and not what goes on behind closed doors.
"That's what I said in relation to my work. They left that part out," she explained. "In terms of my work, yeah, I'm interested in exploring love, and so that comes in all different forms. And that's what I want to do in terms of my private life, I'd never reveal what I've explored in my private life."
She claims it was in reference to her "work?" Well, lets take a look at the actual quote from the magazine...
"My life has been about exploring types of love. I've explored obsession, I've explored loss and love in terns of being in a grief-striken place, I've explored strange sexual fetish stuff, I've explored the mundane aspect of marriage, and monogany. But I'm still on that journey."
So if she is quoted as stating "My life" has been...is she then trying to insinuate the magazine changed the qoute? Another quote from the article, concerning her relation with orb, she describes it...
"That's the sanctity of our marriage. Our relationship is pretty much off bounds and we really dont discuss it except to say were very together. And you know, you work on it. It's very adventurous, extraordinary place to be: incredibly raw, incredibly dangerous and your very much out at sea. You're exposed. You could drown. When you commit to someone like that you live and die together by that decision."
So, does she also expect people to also believe those rather "dire" descriptive words on her relationsip to orb to also pertain to her "work" and not, as she clearly states...on the actual relationship? Well, clearly, she is simply trying to repair another blotched PR blunder! "My life is strange sexual fetish stuff...but I actually meant in my "work!" Yes, patented "INEPT TEAM KIDMAN" at work! Personally, believing kidman is a very dull, bland and pale slab of very "white bread dough" sitting in an oven with absolutely no flame whatsoever... I for sure dont believe these quotes to be anything other than a pathetic piece of PR BS from a failed and floundering hasbeen!
Remember she is 'completely natural'. She would never touch her nose, gums, breasts, cheeks, forehead or hair. How could we even think that? Daddy wouldn't like it either, you know. He would say that his daughter needs a shrink LOL.
her teeth have clearly been done too ... she has changed her look quite substantially ... which when done incrementally, most people don't notice or don't want to. Not so sure about a cheek implant, but she may have wanted more 'definition'. she had the perfect shape of face for ageing well; shouldn't have messed with it and this is the reason why the tabloid press is SO interested in pics of her - and to think she thought it was because she was an 'avant garde' actor. My interest?: I love to see the clothes and what will she wear next ... little girl fantasy as I used to love making lots of different outfits for my barbie doll or paper doll ... and will admit a bit of jealousy with her having new clothes laid at her feet eternally. Bliss.
People, see my bit on Cheek Implants Are As Common As Breast Implants. Seems Nicole has had both. They insert them through your upper gums. Easy, squeezy.
1993:
2009:
15 comments:
HA! I find it the highest of "high-larity" that it is no longer even a question of...yes or no? But it is now... does this weeks procedure makes her look "freakish or not?" For of course, her lips in fact, have looked worse! As this update at Awful Plastic surgury clearly points out...
http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/category/nicole-kidman/
Honestly, does she think these bolted on fruits pass as real?
...ps...**UPDATE**
Ahhhh...so there is an update to the "drunken kidman" "not" posted over at NKU that I commented on yesterday. Well, it would seem my buddys over at NKU thought that they could pull a fast one! It seems today, "it turns out that in fact in this thread they did post the photos...here...
http://www.nicolekidmanunited.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=12176&st=0
Keith And Nicole Out At Night In Nyc ,15 Nov 2009
...it "appears" that, if you look at comment #1...it is a link to pics over at Getty images of a dazed and amazed kidman stumbling in the streets...
"Just little pictures http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.a...=Entertainment#
and then comment #2 says...
"thanks carole"
...and then comment #3 says...
"Thanks!
Ciao"
...but when I checked the site on the 16th, before I posted my comment request to timtam to explain why they "hadnt" posted the photos... I didnt recall seeing those first 3 comments posted on that thread of said drunken kidman photos! Well...if you go here...
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:pW6aQlAXC1oJ:www.nicolekidmanunited.invisionzone.com/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D12176%26view%3Dgetnewpost+Keith+And+Nicole+Out+At+Night+In+Nyc+,15+Nov+2009&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
...to this Google's "cache" of the same page... Those first 3 comments that now appear today...DID NOT EXIST yesterday, Nov 16, 2009 21:20:39 GMT! So, it would appear, dear readers, that after my comment about how the NKUsers were in shame over those drunken kidman pics and wouldnt post them out of embarrassment...they tried to slip in those comments...after the fact!! Boy, how desperate can some people be? Well, in this case, rather lamely desperate!
...pps...
Hee hee! So, for my latest edition of (dramatic music!) "Late Night Musings"...I'd like to do my best imitation of Detective Columbo...
...and now, I'd like to present, in the case of the "NKUSers tampering with the evidence", new evidence that they in fact...had modified...altered...changed... their own thread to make it "appear" that they in fact had posted the pics of a sloshed stumbling, bumbling kidman in the PUBLIC thread of their fansie site after I had challenged them on it! If you will kindly look at the first 3 comments posted at thepublic thread "Keith And Nicole Out At Night In Nyc ,15 Nov 2009"...here...
http://www.nicolekidmanunited.invisionzone.com/index.php?showforum=6
you will see this:
#1-carole Nov 16 2009, 06:03 PM
"Just little pictures http://www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.a...=Entertainment#"
#2-nic&keith Nov 16 2009, 06:21 PM
"thanks carole"
#3-Samantha Stevens Nov 16 2009, 06:59 PM
"Thanks! Ciao"
...these exact and precise comments were in fact...COPIED...word for word...time for time...from their true and original posting...which was....HERE!...
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:sLRsVYxm4BUJ:www.nicolekidmanunited.invisionzone.com/index.php%3Fshowtopic%3D12173+Nic+New+York+Candids&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Nic New York Candids
... and then pasted them onto the starting end of the "public" thread! Yes, the first three comments that "suddenly" appeared at the beginning of the "public" "Keith And Nicole Out At Night In Nyc ,15 Nov 2009" thread yesterday were in fact the first three comments "originally" posted in the "Private members only" thread, "Nic New York Candids!" And someone, very foolishly believed that they could just "slip them in" and make it "appear" that they were not in fact "ashamed" to speak of them in "public." Well, they'll have to get up prety early in the....well you know the rest...So it seems a little questioning is all that is needed to get a little transparancy...and just a little bit of "deductive thinking", eh? "well done Sherlock holmes! oh wait...I'm columbo tonight, right? Yeah, "Excuse me, pardon me?
Geez maclen, just think of all the good you could do in this world if you only spent all that time on something worthwhile. Seriously? You are piecing together evidence of fraud on NKU? I would think the only shame here is on you.
well, it can't be denied any longer, really ... for so long people have said it is just 'plumping lipstick' ... and people who called her out on it were called "haters" ... she is kindov between a rock and a hard place as her original smile shows a lot of gum which i can imagine Hollywood didn't like, especially now that she is "happy" and smiles a lot more ... but then, the repair job looks just so awful I don't know which would have been better ... methinks what God gave her! I think she should have had the op to shorten her top jaw. Someone i knew who showed no teeth when she smiled so had hers lengthened: scary thought but effective in the end. What really is biting Nicole in the bum is that she denied it all: THAT is what people "hate": the dishonesty.
It comes down to this she is a sad insecure woman who has got what she wanted because of the men in her life be it daddy or Mr. Cruise or any of the number of lovers she has had and now her insignificant husband is starting to pull ahead of her, the realization is there that she has no control so it appears she is trying to control what she thinks she can- her looks, her image. She has lost her career. Problem is she is a less than talented, aging actress who isn't interesting not even for her beauty any longer.
Oh come on...of course they are real...about as real as the rest of her! Including her honesty, integrity, morals and HAIR!! haha...yeah, right!
And of course, you can also clearly notice in the series of photos of kidman through the years...is how her "nose" has narrowed and elongated from the procedures... and of course the cheek implants. Of course, what I found interesting is how the "freakish lips" story came out so quickly, on the heels of the kidman "ultra busty" knocks in the press. Especially, as I mentioned, her lips have looked worse than they did at the CMAs. Yet her bust, and especially at the CMA's, actually did look "freakishly big" in comparison to her less than as bulging recent look. But as kidman's soooo "logical explaination" of her "busty look" being a result of having a baby...16 months ago!...I figure the breast comments were an especially sensitive topic for inept team kidman...and the "freakish lips" story, which they just simply ignore anyways...was the lesser of two evils!
And how many nosejobs? Take a look at that!
So, kidman is now attempting to "backtrack" on her "strange sexual fetish stuff" qoute from the british GQ piece...(her "people must have read Urban Myths!) Seems kidman told Access Hollywood...
http://www.nbcdfw.com/entertainment/celebrity/Nicole_Kidman___I_Want_To_Be_In_Love_For_The_Rest_Of_My_Life___Clears_Up__Fetish_Stuff__Quotes-70417807.html
"But according to Nicole, the quote was related to her work on the big screen and not what goes on behind closed doors.
"That's what I said in relation to my work. They left that part out," she explained. "In terms of my work, yeah, I'm interested in exploring love, and so that comes in all different forms. And that's what I want to do in terms of my private life, I'd never reveal what I've explored in my private life."
She claims it was in reference to her "work?" Well, lets take a look at the actual quote from the magazine...
"My life has been about exploring types of love. I've explored obsession, I've explored loss and love in terns of being in a grief-striken place, I've explored strange sexual fetish stuff, I've explored the mundane aspect of marriage, and monogany. But I'm still on that journey."
So if she is quoted as stating "My life" has been...is she then trying to insinuate the magazine changed the qoute? Another quote from the article, concerning her relation with orb, she describes it...
"That's the sanctity of our marriage. Our relationship is pretty much off bounds and we really dont discuss it except to say were very together. And you know, you work on it. It's very adventurous, extraordinary place to be: incredibly raw, incredibly dangerous and your very much out at sea. You're exposed. You could drown. When you commit to someone like that you live and die together by that decision."
So, does she also expect people to also believe those rather "dire" descriptive words on her relationsip to orb to also pertain to her "work" and not, as she clearly states...on the actual relationship? Well, clearly, she is simply trying to repair another blotched PR blunder! "My life is strange sexual fetish stuff...but I actually meant in my "work!" Yes, patented "INEPT TEAM KIDMAN" at work! Personally, believing kidman is a very dull, bland and pale slab of very "white bread dough" sitting in an oven with absolutely no flame whatsoever... I for sure dont believe these quotes to be anything other than a pathetic piece of PR BS from a failed and floundering hasbeen!
Remember she is 'completely natural'. She would never touch her nose, gums, breasts, cheeks, forehead or hair. How could we even think that? Daddy wouldn't like it either, you know. He would say that his daughter needs a shrink LOL.
her teeth have clearly been done too ... she has changed her look quite substantially ... which when done incrementally, most people don't notice or don't want to. Not so sure about a cheek implant, but she may have wanted more 'definition'. she had the perfect shape of face for ageing well; shouldn't have messed with it and this is the reason why the tabloid press is SO interested in pics of her - and to think she thought it was because she was an 'avant garde' actor. My interest?: I love to see the clothes and what will she wear next ... little girl fantasy as I used to love making lots of different outfits for my barbie doll or paper doll ... and will admit a bit of jealousy with her having new clothes laid at her feet eternally. Bliss.
Remember she is 'completely natural'. She would never touch her nose, gums, breasts, cheeks, forehead or hair.
Hey! We should all ease up on poor Nic! Hair bleach, dyes, and silicone all exist in nature, right?
They're all natural, right?
Right?
Right?
This b*tch is a down right diaster!
Grace Kelly Wanna-Be.
People, see my bit on Cheek Implants Are As Common As Breast Implants. Seems Nicole has had both. They insert them through your upper gums. Easy, squeezy.
Post a Comment