So, once again, Nicole Kidman spends another holiday away from her children. But wait – there is a new stand-in – the little boy from "Australia" her newest film, after all, isn't that what this is ALL about? She claims to be such an earthy, family gal, yet rarely sees her kids and presumably spends Easter away from her husband. There are no photos or mention of him at all. While Keith may have had a concert to attend, what happened to her private jet? She has the means to gather family all together for such a glorious day and she didn't. It's a good thing rather, because I like to think that Keith was spending the day celebrating with his own family – yes Nicole, Keith has family who love him but he doesn't feel the need to have a photo with them to remind us of that.
On one hand, I snicker at the thought that perhaps she just wasn't invited with the Urbahn's. On the other, I believe she just doesn't care. He's given her what she needs already and he doesn't have much more use – she showed us that in the recent photos from his concert in OZ- he's become "yawn worthy" to her; very boring. This new little boy she spent the day with – now HE'S good publicity. You see folks; everything Nicole Kidman does is for publicity. Everything is calculated and timed to perfection. I'm hoping Keith's timer is about to go off and that he's DONE because it's so sad to see this pressure cooker.
And speaking of Easter, did you happen to notice the dress? This is the same one she wore back in October. It doesn't look much tighter, yet she's what – at least 5 ½ months pregnant? Do you all remember Katie's look around this far into her pregnancy? One day she's be quite "bumpy" and then the next day not. It's interesting how parallel KUNK is to Tomkat, yet not surprising since she learned from the Master himself. We have a photo of Tom with baby Suri tucked in his jacket, then shortly after, there's another of Nicole with her sister's new baby in a similar pose (difference being she had to borrow a baby for her shot – how many other actresses do we see posing with their sister's new baby?) Katie wore that really weird white "bodysuit" which pulled up along the sides, showing off her tummy – then Nicole "poses" with bodyguard, lifting her up shirt to show the world that Yes, she is indeed pregnant – funny that it looked flabby. Tomkat wouldn't announce the due date or even the month – neither does KUNK.
If Nicole is truly pregnant and this is really what she's wanted all along, why not embrace it? Why not wear appropriate maternity clothing? Why not share the excitement of at least the month she's due? Why not reduce the exercise regime and actually eat – now there's a concept! Why? Because she's Nicole Kidman. She will spend Easter with whomever she wants and not include her own husband. And she will have this baby, quickly whisked away by nannies, and then soon forget its name. I think they both want this child. He's often said he wanted to be a dad. For her, this baby will be nothing but a pacifier for a dying career. Once the newness wears off, she'll move on. And she has a history to prove it.
On one hand, I snicker at the thought that perhaps she just wasn't invited with the Urbahn's. On the other, I believe she just doesn't care. He's given her what she needs already and he doesn't have much more use – she showed us that in the recent photos from his concert in OZ- he's become "yawn worthy" to her; very boring. This new little boy she spent the day with – now HE'S good publicity. You see folks; everything Nicole Kidman does is for publicity. Everything is calculated and timed to perfection. I'm hoping Keith's timer is about to go off and that he's DONE because it's so sad to see this pressure cooker.
And speaking of Easter, did you happen to notice the dress? This is the same one she wore back in October. It doesn't look much tighter, yet she's what – at least 5 ½ months pregnant? Do you all remember Katie's look around this far into her pregnancy? One day she's be quite "bumpy" and then the next day not. It's interesting how parallel KUNK is to Tomkat, yet not surprising since she learned from the Master himself. We have a photo of Tom with baby Suri tucked in his jacket, then shortly after, there's another of Nicole with her sister's new baby in a similar pose (difference being she had to borrow a baby for her shot – how many other actresses do we see posing with their sister's new baby?) Katie wore that really weird white "bodysuit" which pulled up along the sides, showing off her tummy – then Nicole "poses" with bodyguard, lifting her up shirt to show the world that Yes, she is indeed pregnant – funny that it looked flabby. Tomkat wouldn't announce the due date or even the month – neither does KUNK.
If Nicole is truly pregnant and this is really what she's wanted all along, why not embrace it? Why not wear appropriate maternity clothing? Why not share the excitement of at least the month she's due? Why not reduce the exercise regime and actually eat – now there's a concept! Why? Because she's Nicole Kidman. She will spend Easter with whomever she wants and not include her own husband. And she will have this baby, quickly whisked away by nannies, and then soon forget its name. I think they both want this child. He's often said he wanted to be a dad. For her, this baby will be nothing but a pacifier for a dying career. Once the newness wears off, she'll move on. And she has a history to prove it.
7 comments:
When I first found out I was pregnant, I could not wait to start wearing maternity clothes. I wanted to look pregnant and I wanted the whole world to know. I was so happy!
Please tell me how Nicole can STILL fit into a dress she wore back in Oct 07 and be 5-6 months pregnant?
Because she is a freak ? Just guessing.
I agree - I couldn't wait for everyone to see that baby bump - Why try to conceal it all, especially after announcing to the world that she's pregnant, after all?
Well, as is apparent for years now... what we all believe about her and she has always repeatedly shown over and over again, is that everything in her life if geared and scheduled for the simple promotion of her "career", or lack thereof... but as I've maintained over and over again, she is not, as with everything she says or does, very consistant or very good at it. She is not very good in the terrible movie choices she makes, hence the continuous failures... she is not very good at stating the truth of what she intends to do in her "private" life... for example, she and urban were going to retreat to the tennessee ranch, which apparently was just a temporary cover story to explain why she had urban sell "his" tennessee home... she was going to take some personal time and tour with urban, but as the "droopy" eyed, unscheduled photo captures showed, she cant make it through even one of his gigs. And now, we are being hilariously bombarded by a constant series of the most hideous looking, haggard and balding, droopy eyed and putty faced, nonchalant and blase US paparatz beating, while blatantly servicing of aussie paparatz... most embarrassingly self defeating and unattractive photo ops this side of courtney cox and amy winhouse. So is it just the chemical dyes and straighteners that not only has fried her hair, but has begun to affect her mind? Is it the combination of the botox and collogen injections that has effected her reason? Or is it simply when she finally has to rely on her own "artillery" of shills and mouthpieces, sychophants and paid hacks, and media leaking connections, in place of the sympathy and goodwill of the industry pundits who ordained her a A list celeb, she is just shooting blanks? I say its all of the above.
...just noticed a miss typed name... that should read courtney love, not courtney cox in my last comment... although actually cox's FX show is about what all the celebs whine and complain about... the paps exploitation of celebs...but of course when they are only would-be celebs, they court the paps trying to get their pictures on all the rags... but once they make it, they are annoyed...terrified...disgusted... frustrated by the "invasion" of the privacy they once flaunted with complete abandon to get noticed... but once you open the floodgates, its difficult to get them closed... unless the water runs out, and they're back to shilling themselves out to the willing bidders... you'd think that after close to a hundred years, they would have figured, or noticed that is how it is.
Well I'm not surprised she didn't see the kids on Easter. Also for those who will say we don't know that....trust that she would have made a spectacle out of it and called the paps herself to get that photo op taken care of. SHe's a horrible mother. I wonder when the last time was she even actually saw those kids. Oh well their better off without the pasty, selfish one.
Is it me or should she be way bigger than she is for 6 months? Honestly all the pregnant women I've seen that far along are big. With Nicole there's just NOTHING there! That's what leads me to thinking that she is not pregnant...well that and all her lies. I hope the surrogate is getting paid a hefty sum. Although what would be better is if someone were to uncover who she was and expose Nicole for the pathetic liar she is.
Post a Comment