That utterly stupid woman is totally pregnant. We know this but hasn't it been fun to think she isn't? Actually you had to think that, and that’s the point with Nicole Kidman. You had to wonder “is she or isn't she”? You had to question the size of the bump. You wanted to see if she was getting bigger. Yes, dear reader, and you know what? Kidman wanted you to do that.
The fame addicted woman wanted to the world to guess about her baby because then people would be talking about her. She is keeping the sex of the baby and the due date a secret. Why? So we will talk and debate and discuss.
She loves that I am writing this blog about her. She loves that there has been a debate about the child within. We are interested. But you see, dear Nicole, we aren't the world. For the most part when you and Keith divorce, no one will bother with you anymore. Many have already left. Doing stupid stuff like going to a gym when you have a perfectly good one in the new home, wearing winter workout wear when it is in the 90's in Nashville, and even being in Nashville when everyone was told the child within was going to be spawned in Australia, kept us guessing.
The problem is the audience with this whole charade is dwindling, and it really isn't about her that we are interested. Much like her career, few people care about Nicole Kidman, even most of us.
So why am I writing this? Because, in this writer’s opinion, the woman is a liar and a fraud and that must be called out. Is she brilliant enough to keep the whole “is it a surrogate or isn't it?” argument going just to keep the talk about her alive? That would indicate she may be quite unstable. Okay, I can live with that…too bad Keith does, too. But that would be so far out! Almost like buying your own engagement ring and publicity about your personal life… whoops, guess she is capable of it!!!One more note…here is a prediction - when “the child within” is ready to spawn - Perez Hilton will have the first contraction rumor.
97 comments:
I don't fault them for keeping the sex of the child and the due date private. They do live in a very public eye, they are entitled to keep something private. Hell, maybe they even chose to not know the sex - I know I did. I wanted to be surprised and not have any preconceived ideas about my
baby.
Kidman certainly plays all the usual industry games and adheres to all the predictable techniques used to try and build some useful buzz... unfortunately she isnt very interesting and is simply lousy at it... it's so easy to pick apart and spot from miles away... yes, let's take perez hilton...he seems to have lost interest in kidman or the kid...suspiciously right after getting that "exclusive" on the sex of the kid...it's now been 16 days...2 entire weeks since he's posted on kidman... and this after previously posting at least one entry a week about kidman the past 5 months. Just as I commented over at Forehead..."kidman trying to confuse the public with these kind of media "shell games" or a version of online "3 card monte" will not make this or any other of her typical cover stories fresh, or revealing or even surprising."
Thank you UMs for proving once and for all you are totally insane.
This particular post should provide much evidence in the lawsuit I hope they level on you so fast it makes your head spin.
The only one questioning every freak'n detail about Nicole is you. There is no person/people more obsessed with Nicole than you.
I thought you had reached low levels before but this beats them all.
Oh this is rich! The rumors that were started in the first place by the skepti-haters are now being portrayed as all Nicole's idea? and endorsed by her? That is so ridiculous.
No one cares and yet here we are still discussing Nicole. You absolutely cannot say no one is interested and then in the same breath yammer on about her every move. There's a new blog entry here every couple of days even though all she's done recently is lived her life in Nashville. But she's so irrelevant...yeah sure Umyths!
yawn, you really hit the proverbial nail on the head with your post. I dont think there would ever be a lawsuit, but the rest of what you said is right on target!
Speaking of the inept Kidman pr team - here's a project for them.
NK said she got preg over Keith's birthday visit home. His bday is Oct. 26 - which matches up with the expected due date of late July. However, very few first pregnancies are carried full term. What better way to endear NK to Americans than to have her baby on July 4th? We assume he or she will be born here in the states so it will have dual citizenship. The Aussie power couple's baby born in the US on the USA Independence Day - THAT just MIGHT generate some media buzz. It also might "beat AJ to the delivery room".
CJ said...
"Speaking of the inept Kidman pr team - here's a project for them...
...The Aussie power couple's baby born in the US on the USA Independence Day - THAT just MIGHT generate some media buzz. It also might "beat AJ to the delivery room"."
Or even more contrived, cj, born on ex Cruise's b-day, july 3... perhaps the actual target date! Kidman pretty much used every movie... every interview to mention the marriage and the split from cruise...so this may be another attempt to media whore on his name again.
PS....
... I almost missed the hilarity of what I was just theorizing! "Kidman concieves on b-day of current husband to deliver on b-day of ex husband!" That would certainly confirm the freakshow that has become of kidman's warped life, huh?
http://www.countryhound.com/Articles/1920/Nicole-and-Keith-Update-Nicole-Makes-Forbes-List.aspx
Nicole Makes Forbes List
Money is no object, but it is a number. Nicole Kidman has made the Forbes Celebrity 100 List, landing at number 57. On newsstands today, the issue features a picture of Kidman and a short career description, with expectations for greatness with the coming Australia.
The mom-to-be fell in the middle of the pack, but she is in great company—making the list just below basketball pro Kevin Garnett and one spot above author James Patterson. Number 1 once again goes to the powerhouse that is Oprah Winfrey, and catching the final spot is country-lovin' foodie, Paula Dean.
As Country Music star Keith Urban is busy on tour, the media is continually looking to Kidman's future projects. The UK's Daily Mail today published more details about Kidman's coming musical project, Nine. The film will begin shooting this October in London at Shepperton Studios. Filming with Hollywood greats such as Judi Dench, Daniel Day Lewis and Sophia Loren will take an estimated five months.
Hope they already have Kid Kidman's passport application filed in order to have it by Oct to fly to London. I hope they take the private jet and not commercial - that's a long flight to put up with Kidman's crying. And the baby's.
Utterly
Mindless blog;
Yet another example of
The insanity and
Hate permeating the skeptics
Shame on you!
"CJ said...
Speaking of the inept Kidman pr team - here's a project for them.
NK said she got preg over Keith's birthday visit home. His bday is Oct. 26 - which matches up with the expected due date of late July."
Get your facts straight! NK NEVER said anything about when or where the child was conceived. Some members of the press speculated that and made up a story.
"We assume he or she will be born here in the states so it will have dual citizenship."
Again, check your facts. Whether the baby is born in the US or Australia, he/she can have dual citizenship.
"- THAT just MIGHT generate some media buzz. It also might "beat AJ to the delivery room".
Only you nut cases care about that. No one else does.
btw .. your beloved AJ was supposed to have delivered the twins already, according to E! How come you are not questioning why she still has a baby bump. Did her babies crawl back into her womb because it's not 4th of July yet and they needed the fireworks to herald their births? What happened to the "not inept" Brangelina PR team and their "planted" stories?
Maclen~ Perez did his turn around right after the Cindy Adams incident. He was full blown on her butt until then. After that, he eased in 2 mild snarky comments then regular comments.
Her PR girls had something to do with this. Whether they worked out a deal or they paid him off or some how threatened him with something.
He disliked her too much to suddenly get this quiet. He's a self serving whimp, so I am not suprised.
hesaweiner said...
"Maclen~ Perez did his turn around right after the Cindy Adams incident. He was full blown on her butt until then. After that, he eased in 2 mild snarky comments then regular comments."
And culminating in that "exclusive" he promoted way back on May 28...It seems simply that after the Adams piece about alcohol, hesaweiner, and the severe impact it had on her attempt to cultivate an "immaculate" image... which clearly also includes those ridiculous claims that she is "all natural"... without the benefit whatsoever of facial procedures, plastic surgery or botox, or that she doesnt even smoke... she felt the need to apparently make a deal with hilton. And it doesnt nessessarly have to to with actual "payoffs"... but simply as you mention, a deal... they give him an exclusive, and with promises or assurences of possible future "exclusives", just as she seems to have "exclusives" arrangements and a photo ops red phone to JJ and GG, hilton will apparently ease off, or in this case, lay off of her completely. And as you also mention, hilton has too many self serving ambitions to believe he would pass on a opportunity.
"Utterly
Mindless blog;
Yet another example of
The insanity and
Hate permeating the skeptics
Shame on you!"
Okay, maybe I will try this for a third time. (Any of you three can answer.)RealityCheck, Karolyn or Sonoria.
WHY then are you reading and posting here if you feel this blog is mindless and/or hateful? I would think if you didn't care for this you'd find something you did enjoy. I really am asking in a polite way, as if you aren't here to "stir the pot", then what is it that is drawing you here?
the only insanity going on here is kidman and her sorry attempts at trying to stay in the press......she is sickening, and taking keith down with her....it's SHE who should be ashamed, but then she has no shame, does she?
and why don't you NK lovers answer cassa role's questions? she has asked you 2 or 3 times and you fail to respond.
NK is a selfish ridiculous woman who doesn't blink twice at ruining somebody's life and career to achieve her own desires.
her every pathetic move is planned and calculated.....and yes, keith is to blame, too, for letting her take such control of his life.....sad sad sad
this is how i see it, and i'm not changing my mind, no matter how much i'm ridiculed. in some pics the bump is small, in some it's huge, in others it's between big and small....intentional to keep speculation going....
it's one thing to keep the sex and due date to yourselves and quite another to pimp yourself every chance you get to stay relevant....
Casse Role said...
WHY then are you reading and posting here if you feel this blog is mindless and/or hateful? I would think if you didn't care for this you'd find something you did enjoy. I really am asking in a polite way, as if you aren't here to "stir the pot", then what is it that is drawing you here?
Because they love the attention and their name in print on the screen as much as the tall pale one they admire.
You would certainly hope they don't actually believe any minds will be changed. If so, talk about delusional!
Like with "Nicole Kidman's Forehead" blog, it always amazes me how the fans will take ther time to read our posts and tell us we are warped and crazy. But the never once admit to being brainwashed by these stars. And to talk of lawsuits, well that is a beauty. For starters Nik and Keith dont even google their own names. Secondly, they'd be suing every tom dick and harry. There are so many gossip sites, blog sites who are showing them up for what they really are. What is the real reason the fans visit these blogs? is it because the truth hurts? Is it because deep down they know we are onto something and want to see what the latest is? Or is it that they truly enjoy our postings but can't possibly admit to it in case Nic is watching?
Casse role (can't you even spell properly), cactus et al ...
"O....kay....umm a goo goo goo, a gaa gaa gaa. That's all I want to say to you." ~ Forehead blog.
Gee sonora that sounds about as intelligent as something your pasty queen would say.Is she giving you lessons in how to sound like an idiot? She would make a great teacher because she sounds like a complete moron everytime she tries to speak with out reading from a script
"maclen said...
just as she seems to have "exclusives" arrangements and a photo ops red phone to JJ and GG, hilton will apparently ease off, or in this case, lay off of her completely. And as you also mention, hilton has too many self serving ambitions to believe he would pass on a opportunity."
lol, everyone seems to have "deal$$" with her. No wonder you folks are pi$$ed because you can't get a penny out of her, and she and Keith won't give you the time of day.
Go ahead, continue to wallow in your own bile.
doublewide, we are not on trial here. We don't have to answer anyone's questions at the drop of hat or at all for that matter.
But casse roll, since you are looking for answers i will say this:
The bloggers of UMyths, or at least one of them, have stated all opinions are welcome. If anyone cant deal with that then skip over our posts or stop coming here. All this whining over not being able to criticize Keith and his personal life, and then when it gets turned around they can't stand to hear opposing opinion. Grow up!
Why the recent demands for us to leave? Are you worried all 3 of us will take over LOL Or are you worried that this blog has gone off the deep end as of late with its outrageous ramblings? And us pointing it out makes it all the worse? I can tell you now it never had that much credibility to begin with. If the blogs continue in the vein of this latest one, it can only go down from here.
If there are so many gossip sites revealing them for "who they really are" then why claim she's struck deals with them? All of them have had negative things to say and allow comments by those who don't like them (except Lainey). Again, the very people who claimed they were censored only want negative spin on KUNK. How interesting. "If its not negative we don't want to hear it. If its not negative Nicole must have paid them off." Well the rest of the world doesn't find her the pariah all of you think she is.
Every time you post that we need to go away or that any neutral story is a pay-off the skepti-haters are showing what hypocrites they really are. You'll never get the majority to believe this nonsense and you certainly wont change my mind. Deal with it.
Whether the baby is born here or some place else it will still be a citizen on the US. It's mother is an American.
Every time you post that we need to go away or that any neutral story is a pay-off the skepti-haters are showing what hypocrites they really are. You'll never get the majority to believe this nonsense and you certainly wont change my mind. Deal with it.
personally i don't care if you stay or go, and you won't be changing MY mind either.....so DEAL WITH THAT
rememberwhen said...
"Whether the baby is born here or some place else it will still be a citizen on the US. It's mother is an American."
But of course, rememberwhen, with kidman its all about the contrived imagery... sure any one born in any other country can file for naturalized citizenship... but they will not be considered a native born citizen...of course as I say, it's all about the imagery. For instance, Schwarzenegger no doubt would love to run for the US presidency, but not being a native born citizen, he cant. And not that I believe a kid of kidman and the orb would ever reach that level of anything...except for a future appearance on "Celebrity Rehab", what with the wide array of "chemical dependencies" of it's parents... botox, collagen, heroin...jack daniels... So it's all certainly about image for kidman, seeing that she is so unpopular here in the states. But then wasn't there just an Aussie poll released that showed she is not popular in Oz either? oooh...bummer....
maclen said...
rememberwhen said...
"Whether the baby is born here or some place else it will still be a citizen on the US. It's mother is an American."
... sure any one born in any other country can file for naturalized citizenship... "
Do your fact check first before blabbing your ignorance!
Wow, I've been gone a bit and when I get back I read about lawsuits and even more psychobabble from the wanna bees. There needs to be some medication adjusting done quickly!
Can we agree that no one that posts on this blog is going to change their minds about kidman?...it is what it is.
Casse-kidman is their role model. I'm sure they feel the need to protect their false idol from all the opinions stated here that are negative in nature. After all, she does no wrong and is not held responsible for anything. She just has to "be" and they are all happy as the day is long!
Your logic is very bizarre. Now she likes this blog? How do you know that?
Sonora_Melody said...
"Do your fact check first before blabbing your ignorance!"
I don't take kindly to be calling stupid. I never once said anything to you or about you. I think you should show me the respect that I showed you!!!!!! I'm not the one that is ignorant, you are! Also, I did do my fact checking!!!!
It doesn't matter where this baby is born it is already an American Citizen because Nicole is.
Rememberwhen - my comments were directed at maclen. Her comments of "sure any one born in any other country can file for naturalized citizenship..." showed a basic ignorance INS guidelines.
You are right that the Urban child can be an American citizen regardless of where he/she is born, on account of the mother being a U.S. citizen.
Sorry Sonora_Melody. I thought your comment was towards me.
So I'm back, and was just surfing some movie web sights... links... and over at Anne Thompsons blog I noticed she had an inbedded video of the trailer for the new movie, The Women... and it had an upclose shot of meg ryan. Well, it seems ryan has finally layed off the lip injections... she almost looks back to normal... if you'll recall back in 2003 ryan severely... and I do mean severely damaged her career when she replaced kidman in kidmans first, and to date only produced bomb...In the Cut. Kidman was to star in that seamy , tawdry dreck about a kinky woman who gets off sexually by getting hot and heavy with a cop she suspects may be a killer... well anyways, ryan joined that film at the Toronto film festival but all anyone talked or wrote about was her atrocious "trout pout". Well it seems ryan has learned the lesson and has layed off the lip juicing... and incidently, kidman also was at that toronto film festival, with another one of her seamy, tawdry drecks of a movie, Human stain, as a tawdry, seamy, chain smoking redneck...boy talk about typecasting... getting all hot and heavy with grandpa Hopkins... again...typecasting! Of course both of those movies magnificantly flopped at the Box office, but then kidman seems to be uncontrolably drawn to those usually disfunctionally tawdry, kinky and "kreepy " roles" that no doubt color her unaturally warped and demented belief that cutting and pulling and injecting her face with toxins actually still makes her look natural!
...Ps...
Also just wanted to update and highlight that is is now 17 straight days without a snide comment from hilton about leather face...
Maclen: again, do some fact checking before you mouth off your ignorance.
"In the Cut" production cost was around $12Million, and its worldwide boxoffice was $23.7Million. That's hardly what anyone would call a "bomb". Counting video, cable, network TV and syndication revenues, I think Kidman got a good return on her investment in that film.
...well, seeing that I was sent on a little journey of reminiscing by the sight of a recent appearance of meg ryan in her newest movie trailer, looking remarkably normal in her obvious "recovery" of facial procedural over indulgance... unlike some... who shall remain... well...KIDMAN... I'd figure that I would continue with my little history lesson. So pull up a seat as I take you back to a long ago time, "to that wonderful, mystical year of our lord, Two Thousand and Three"...for as you will recall the aforementioned cinematic atrocities, the kidman starring Human Stain and the kidman "produced" In the Cut... if you could call what she did "producing"... as Cut director campion was quoted as say at the time, the extent of kidman's "producing" was to simply show up to the movie set once... and of course both movies were pathetically released on Halloween of '03 and both films immediately died a miserable and critically reviled death. But that is not where this lesson ends, my friends, not by a long shot... only 2 months later another unspectacular cinematic kidman dud was released... called Cold Mountain... a major disappointment all around, especially for the studio responsible for this film, Miramax...although nominated for 7 oscars, and no doubt after the untold millions thrown by the weinsteins to buy those noms... still failed to pick up noms for the prestege categories of Best Picture, Director, and most noticably, best actress... the "waxen" kidman unsurprisingly out acted in the film by rene zellweger. Now you may believe that the lesson would naturally end with kidman's typical failure of her prerequisite 2 films in one year. But the lesson extends to the start of the next year, as the weinstein bros were to lose control of there very own company Miramax to Disney. For you see, the weinstein company was not only responsible for the disappointing Cold Mountain...but also for that aforementioned abysmal kidman starrer, Human Stain, which had faded from seemingly "inhuman" existance only a few months before. For as one of the main themes of this blog is concerning kidman... whether it pertains to leading actors... movie studios and it's moguls... or fragile country crooners for that matter... kidman is never a good or sound business choice! Class is now dismissed....
at the end of the day, it is all about the advertisers .... the more we argue and debate and call each other names, especially the classic "hater", the more anyone stirs up controversy around 'product icons' or famous endorsers, the more the advertisers are laughing all the way to the bank. My e-mail box is always filled with at least half a dozen *SPAMS* ... and guess which one is there every day: OMEGA watches, that which nicole's face endorses ... clearly I am 'tracked' on the sites pertaining to NK; for which we need to submit our e-mail - even submitting public e-box, it still worms all the way back to the e-mail of origin - no such thing as free lunch or free fight. so i think, part of her contract with Omega is to 'do' sightings, posings, rumours, PR op's, anything to keep us coming here so the cookies can track us down and shove their products in our faces.
I it why Russel Crowe said product endorsing busts your 'contract with your audience'. NK went too commercial, which is why she keeps including Indies to show what a thespian she is. She herself said she felt like a 'commodity'. Doesn't take much to see why. Her 'Monroe' spoof was to re-inforcement her tie with Chanel 5; despite 'losing' the contract shortly thereafter. She is no longer the 'image' that Chanel wants for its sexy fragrance. NK has tried to be voluptuous, but it didn't work. She should just give the role of motherhood all she's got. And be happy with that.
In the meantime, the more we argue, the more the moola is being tallied by the big boys with the big products.
Again, Maclen, check your facts.
The Weinstein brothers sold Miramax to Disney in 1993 for $80Million, that's 10 years BEFORE your point of reference of 2003. They lost "control" to Disney at that point. Morever, the Weinsteins never got along with Disney CEO Michael Eisner.
Before you "invent" more Miramax/Disney stories, let me tell you that I have been s Disney shareholder for almost 20 years and have followed the Weinstein-Disney saga. Your made-up stories simply won't fly.
Kidman is reportedly attached to "Nine", a film to be produced by the Weinstein Co. If she is "never a good or sound business choice" as you claim, the Weinsteins would not have offered her a role in any of their films.
Well, dove, everybody has their place in the world...and everybody has there jobs.. whatever they choose to do... All I think is, well for me anyways, irrelevent to what occurs on this one blog, which I have decided to contribute with my thoughts, opinions and musings... and I find it has absolutely no favorable or positive effect for kidman whatsoever.,.otherwise it wouldnt get any attention... well, from a admittingly patheticly miniscule and ineffective naysaying from the braying peanut gallery that is kidman following, anyways, to show that it does have an effect against her disengenuous image. And as is obvious the traffic in here is good for Urban Myths and Co., and thats alright with me...I just keep on keeping on... and I can certainly take satisfaction that finally, the reality has met the image, and decimated it to reveal that kidman is revealed to be just what she was originally all along, just a mediocre celeb who rode the coattails to a higher profile, who felt the warm glow of the limelight temporarily and is now just an aging, crumbling and slipping artifact of ancient "babylon" or should I say "Hollywood Babylon"? HEE HAA!
NK has been quite successful with her product endorsements compared to other A-listers.
Her Chanel commercial was supposed to be only a one-time deal. By the time it's over at the end of this year, the ad would have run for 5 years. Forbes deemed her a major success for Chanel no. 5 (http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/18/style-star-ad-forbeslife-cx_nr_0418style.html) By comparison, Angelina is considered a failure for the St. John Knits brand. Her 3-year contract will not be renewed. Another A-lister who was also a failure in product endoresement was JLo, who got dumped by Louis Vuitton after less than two years.
my point senora_melody is that controversy [including commentator-bashing) is courted by the media, all forms now, because the advertisers demand it ...
... meaning any attention is better than no attention at all ... being top of mind, it's called; whatever it takes, based on what people want. at NKU they simultaneously bash certain media outlets, ban certain publications, then go right ahead and scan the very articles of their derision.
who is just not 'getting it'.
"Pot calling kettle black" Dove: aren't YOU contributing to the media attention on NK by the very existence of this blog? The skeptics here scour NK-related articles much more than the NK fan sites, who generally don't post stuff from blogs or trashy gossip sites like those of Perez and Lainey. In fact, the cuckoos among you scrutinize every NK photo so you can "spin" your own stories, further encouraging the paparazzi to stalk her.
. And as is obvious the traffic in here is good for Urban Myths and Co., and thats alright with me...I just keep on keeping on... and I can certainly take satisfaction that finally, the reality has met the image, and decimated it to reveal that kidman is revealed to be just what she was originally all along, just a mediocre celeb who rode the coattails to a higher profile, who felt the warm glow of the limelight temporarily and is now just an aging, crumbling and slipping artifact of ancient "babylon" or should I say "Hollywood Babylon"? HEE HAA!
and YEE HAW!!
gee, this place has been busy.....i've been off awhile. kudos to meg ryan....good to know, maclen, thanks for posting that. and thanks for the history lesson!
one only needs to see NK up against rene z. in Cold Mountain to see how inept an actress she is. i have honestly tried to cut the woman (NK) some slack, but fact is, she is just a lousy actress like you said, maclen, riding those TC coattails.
p.s.
i don't think there is that much pap stalking going on....she calls em too much for her little photo ops.
and i see what you're saying, dove, about the advertisers laughing all the way to the bank.
intersting about hilton laying off of NK so long....
Blogger Sonora_Melody said...
lol, everyone seems to have "deal$$" with her. No wonder you folks are pi$$ed because you can't get a penny out of her, and she and Keith won't give you the time of day.
Why would anyone want her money? Maybe its not needed? Oh and she and Keith won't give who the time of day?
How do you know that? We know deals have been made there is no other explanation. So sit up there on that perch you like to preach from when Kidman is done with you, you just might be able to join the real world.
Sonora_Melody said...
"Pot calling kettle black" Dove: aren't YOU contributing to the media attention on NK by the very existence of this blog?
my point exactly!
and S_M, i have a good *SPAM* filter, so my trawling is no skin off my teeth.
i gave up wearing a watch years ago so Omega can spam me as much as they want, I ain't buying it; no matter how good, bad or ugly their spokespeople are.
I simply enjoy rigorous or vigerous debate as long as it doesn't get ugly between the debaters. the content is irrelevant; logic, sensitivity and objectivity rule.
we, as consumers are allowed to judge 'product' and share findings. we are not allowed spiritually to judge the real person behind the image; like also behind the safety of our petty little monikers or avatars. .... just generalising.
Sonora said: "In fact, the cuckoos among you scrutinize every NK photo so you can "spin" your own stories, further encouraging the paparazzi to stalk her."
Holy crap, Sonora...speaking of pot calling the kettle black!! That's hilarious.
I've never seen a group of people who are better at spinning a story in the "correct" image direction than NK and her supporters. You interpret everything you read and every picture you see the way YOU / NK wants. Or you declare the info a lie or the picture "doctored." You have absolutely NO OBJECTIVITY when it comes to NK.
The skeptics may be in the same boat ... but in the opposite direction. But to say you are on the side of "truth" and the skeptics are "haters" is just ludicrous. I actually think that celebrities are pretty much spinning everything you see in the media in the direction they want it to go, or trying to do so. I truly think that Kidman's peeps got to Perez and he is going to mind his P's n Q's to get some exclusive info ... like the baby's gender. And I have NO doubt that Flynet was bought off, or the assault of the photographer would have been a big deal. That was a horrid event...and anyone who says otherwise is either blind or stupid.
Do you raise llamas, by the way??
doublewide said...
"maclen, thanks for posting that. and thanks for the history lesson!
Certainly, the biggest lesson to gain from history, doublewide, is to not repeat the same mistakes. And kidman has made many mistakes, and I dont expect she has learned anything... in fact she just keeps repeating them and no doubt surrounds herself with a team as clueless as she. So she'll continue to pick the dreariest, self conciously self absorbed movie roles that will bore and repel the general movie viewing public. And her paid hacks will simply say give me my share of the paycheck and get another immediately. And it doesnt surprise me to hear that kidman is now shilling for omega... when your clout is shot and your no longer going to be paid your usual amount because your a miserable failure, every payday you can scrounge up in an attempt to try to keep your yearly totals up and not drop you out of the top list of earners is a desperate and telling indication of failure.
Yet another celebrity endorser got dropped: Keira Knightley after less than 2 years with Chanel. Others with short stint as endorsers: JLo (less than 2 years with Louis Vuitton) and Angelina Jolie (3 years with St John's Knits).
It's interesting that the skeptics here stayed completely quiet on their "dumping", but made a big fuss about NK, even though NK outlasted all of them with her endorsement deal at Chanel. :-)
You don't get it, Sonora. We don't pay attention to the other celebs and if NK wasn't involved with Keith, I likely couldn't give a rip about what a self absorbed controlling manipulator she is.
Forget about the others ... you seem so absorbed with how superior NK is and now inferior every other celeb is, that I am concerned for your emotional well being. I think you should back away from the situation for awhile and not think about how important NK's success is to you. You should worry more about yourself, dear.
Even at my most monkey like peak, I never defended Keith when there were obvious issues...and now that there are obvious issues with NK, you should do the same, if you're able. Take an objective look at the great Kidman and admit to yourself that she is addicted to fame, a bad mother and obsessed with her career. When you can finally admit that, you will be able to see her for who she is. A reasonable but not great actress who became wealthy on the back of her X husband and who is now desperately trying to hang on to that fame and celebrity by playing a game with the tabloids and the paparazzi.
Even at my most monkey like peak, I never defended Keith when there were obvious issues...and now that there are obvious issues with NK, you should do the same, if you're able. Take an objective look at the great Kidman and admit to yourself that she is addicted to fame, a bad mother and obsessed with her career. When you can finally admit that, you will be able to see her for who she is. A reasonable but not great actress who became wealthy on the back of her X husband and who is now desperately trying to hang on to that fame and celebrity by playing a game with the tabloids and the paparazzi.
ya nailed it! only i'm not sold on the "reasonable part" LOL
great post, imahick
"It's interesting that the skeptics here stayed completely quiet on their "dumping", but made a big fuss about NK, even though NK outlasted all of them with her endorsement deal at Chanel."
1. This is a NK site. Why would anyone (except those of you desperate to make a point and grasping at straws) bring other celebrities in to bash when NK gives us plenty of material to keep us busy.
2. Comparing NK to JLO & Co is like comparing prunes to apples to oranges.
I don't need a "hick" to psychoanalyse me. Thank you very much!
Use your own psycho-babble on yourself. "I am concerned for your emotional well being"??? Now that's a laugh!
"you seem so absorbed with how superior NK is and now inferior every other celeb is" Hardly! Actually, it's the skeptics here who are forever pointing out how everyone else is better than NK.
Sonora...you seem a bit defensive. Relax. Take a deep breath. Maybe read a book and take care of YOURSELF. You seem to over react to any criticism about NK and there is SOOOO much coming from all angles these days. You really should distance yourself for awhile, for your own well being.
I really don't need "advice" from a "hick". Thank you very much!
As the saying goes, practice what you preach!
I'm very relaxed as I don't need to spend time inventing stories as you skeptics do. I only deal with facts! And I don't spend time scrutinizing every NK photo like you skeptics do.
I only deal with facts! And I don't spend time scrutinizing every NK photo like you skeptics do
believe me, it only takes a second or two to see "something just ain't right" with that woman's pics
You see, Sonora, I am not embarrassed by my "name." That seems to disturb you alot. Please don't be disturbed by my name. It really means nothing. Just relax and don't let it bother you so much. You seem to be living through the arrogance of NK...and that doesn't become you.
You should try to not worry about what we are named, what our opinions are and be more concerned about having a realistic look at the TRUTH that is Nicole Kidman. I'm talking about the truth now...not the PR spin that Wendy spews to the tabloids (and in that I include PEOPLE).
If you could just take an objective view, that truth you think you preach (and I do mean preach) would look very different. But I do realize that you are incapable of that objectivity and I don't hold it against you. I realize by reading your posts that you are an angry person, who has a very high opinion of herself and a very low opinion of anyone with a dissenting view. That's OK...I get it. I hope some day you will be able to accept that we all have an opinion and it is as valid as yours. Stop preaching to us and just state your opinion. Stop bashing the posters and just state your opinion. It's really that simple.
Great post Imahick.You got your point across without resorting to the arrogance and rudeness of the person you're responding to.
touche Imahick!
Everyone's got there panties in a bunch! WoW!
I think we need to get back on topic..
NK is Evil, Lets start there today.
PS, I think the Bump is a girl bump! Good Godz will that make NKx2? Help us all!!!!!!
I agree Imahick. We can agree and disagree on the subject at hand, but we really don't need to "bash" each other. Many forget that this blog is "someone's" and that we are all guests here.
imahick, there is nothing objective about this blog. Thats why its going off the rails. The pictures and accompanying comments on the home page alone are proof that Urban Myths is anything but fair or objective. Never mind the actual blogs.
How hypocritical of you to criticize sonora for sticking to her opinions. And at the same time talking down to her while you wont budge with yours. The supporters of this marriage are completely blind, and the fact that Nicole is poison is just so obvious? Well let me ask you this? Why is it that now Nicole is with Keith posters are spewing their venom. Sure, she's had her detractors, every A-list celebrity does. But why has this come out now after she started a relationship with Keith? Only former KU fans are intelligent enough to see her as she really is? Get off your high horse and accept there are folks out there that will never ever agree with you. And we have a right to do so.
We have a people leak this morning trying to convince us that "NK is friendly". So much for no pap calls while in Nashville. Even though SHE "arrived first from a back entrance" their pictures still got taken and are not consistent with a couple who have been having fun. Or are even enjoying being together. And telling us she "came in the back" and trying to make it seem she doesn't want attention won't work Kamp Kidman. When she truly doesn't want attention she can fly under the radar. If she got caught by the photogs it's because someone alerted them to where she would be and when.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20206704,00.html
•Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban, having fun with a cute toddler at a Starbucks in Franklin, Tenn., outside of Nashville. The expectant actress – who arrived first from a back entrance – and Urban were completely engaged with a chatty little boy at the table next to them. "Nicole was very friendly but Keith seemed ga-ga!" an observer tells us. They played peekaboo with the friendly little guy, who waved and talked to them. "[Keith] had a genuine smile and he took a real interest in [him]," says the patron of the country star, who recently said he's "learning a new vocabulary" while getting ready for baby.
Yes, that People leaked photo opportunity certainly bolsters my "reality has met the image"... and as a terrible actress she cant even pretend to begin to "act" the part of her own leaked fabricated imagery. Seems that the equally dense and sycophantic People cannot even match a photo to their own ridiculous descriptions of what supposedly occured... all they can show is the reality of disenchanted, drearily miserable and uninteresting people "disquised" of a fun loving, happy go lucky couple! Boy Id hate to see a photo of the "dynamic duo" in unadulterated and uninhibited ecstasy...they may even crack a smile.
Since some around here insist on bringing other actresses in for comparison...
Cate Blanchett was at the Launch of the ‘Surviving Australia’ exhibition at the Australian Museum in Sydney on 6/12/08 (since NK was out of the country and unavailable". The 38 year-old actress and mother Cate Blanchett doesn’t mince words when it comes to explaining how she feels about her fellow thespians and others who undergo plastic surgery. She says that she doesn’t find it attractive when people get work done and that their motivation is “self obsession” and “fear.”
So much for her and NK being "such good friends NK wants to be her neighbor".
HAHAHAH!
thanks for posting CJ
what do you want to bet that they put up another photo once the queen catches wind of this?
She'll probably just call Vogue and make sure her interview - from Feb - includes another "I'm completely natural" or similar statement.
Well, what I find interesting is that it seems JJ nor GG has anything on this obvious People planted photo of this supposedly "happy" event... But it certainly makes sense...this is for People... JJ or GG wouldn't want to horn in on that exclusive... they'll wait patiently for the phone call for their "exclusive".
Ah... the "great" Cate!
From another blog:
"I found this same quote from Cate in an article from September, 2007 published in Australia’s Courier Mail so she said it at least 8 or 9 months ago. Interestingly enough, Cate also is a spokesperson for skincare line SK-II. She says she uses one of their products, a moisturizing skin mask made of cotton, every morning while she makes her sons’ breakfast. Interesting that Cate calls plastic surgery “self obsession and fear” but that she admits using a mask that costs at least $15 per application. Not that there’s anything wrong with high end skin care, but she’s raving about a wrinkle-reducing mask while denouncing people who have plastic surgery. It’s different, sure, but it’s for the same reasons."
"Great" Cate and her relentless pursuit of PR never missed a film festival, photoshoot or red carpet event ANYWHERE in the world while she was pregnant with her third child, leaving her other two sons in Australia, and no one screamed "why isn't she with her other children" or pointed out “the risk of flying while pregnant”.
"Great" Cate also made sure that she took her 7-day old child to the recent Australian Summit where she KNEW there would be LOTS of photographers around for her photo op. It will be interesting to see the skeptics' reactions if the Urbans' show up at an event in the near future with 7-day old Baby Urban facing a barrage of photographers.
As if that photo op of a 7-day old baby was not enough, "great" Cate had to proclaim to the press: "When our youngest son came out of the womb he came out talking. My husband keeps saying to him, 'It's OK to be quiet - you don't have to talk if you don't have anything to say."
And let’s not forget “great” Cate signed a petition recently supporting the public display of full frontal nude photographs of 13-year-old kids, with said photographs readily available via the internet to pedophiles worldwide. Wow, such “greatness”.
“Dr.” Hick, perhaps you should take a dose of your own medicine: “If you could just take an objective view, that truth you think you preach (and I do mean preach) would look very different…..” Objective? Huh! This blog and the skeptics who post here are at the opposite end of objective.
“I realize by reading your posts that you are an angry person, who has a very high opinion of herself and a very low opinion of anyone with a dissenting view.” More psycho-babble, “Dr.” Hick? That certainly sounds like YOU have a very high opinion of yourself with your “analysis” of me.
You’re right, realitycheck, how hypocritical of imahick!
You won't be seeing NK anywhere with a 7 day old baby. That kid is going to be handed to the nanny the minute it arrives from whereever it's arriving from. The nanny will hand it over to NK for her cover shoot and NK will toss it right back to the nanny once the pictures taken. She will then order the nanny to shut that f#%^ing kid up or she's fired. JUst like she did with Imelda and Conway.
"cricket said...
You won't be seeing NK anywhere with a 7 day old baby. ... The nanny will hand it over to NK for her cover shoot ..."
You're contradicting yourself there. So we may see her with her 7-day old baby for a cover shoot? :-)
CJ said...
"It's interesting that the skeptics here stayed completely quiet on their "dumping", but made a big fuss about NK, even though NK outlasted all of them with her endorsement deal at Chanel."
1. This is a NK site. Why would anyone (except those of you desperate to make a point and grasping at straws) bring other celebrities in to bash when NK gives us plenty of material to keep us busy....
===================================
the skeptics are every bit as guilty of throwing other celebrities into the mix when it suits their purpose (i.e., jolie's pregnancy).
Sobora is the sympathy pregnancy not working for you? I mean is the baby kicking and is it uncomfortable because it is so hot? Why don't you
sit back and have a smoke and a nice ice coffee like someone else..
A-R-A-T spelled backwards: you can speculate all you want, but I'm having a great time.
All the cuckoo skeptics here are providing me great material to finish my thesis. Go ahead, make my day. :)
honestly, you NK supporters, how can you possibly think NK will be a good mother to this baby after the way she's treated her adopted kids?
and don't give me any drivel about TC not "allowing" her to see them. she could if she wanted to.
and you call us cuckoo? anybody buying into NK's spin about her being anything but a "user" needs to have their head examined...
and no matter what you say about cate b., at least she can actually ACT....(but i'm not one of those skeptics who brings in other celebrities to compare them to NK), altho i did mention rene z. in Cold Mountain....so no need to point THAT out to me. (please note i'm not the one who brought up cate), so don't tell me i'm contradicting myself.
NK is so pathetic, she is ruining herself on her own.....no need to compare IMO. she's been a user all of her life IMO, and she's using and taking keith down with her.
maclen said: they'll wait patiently for the phone call for their "exclusive".
Exactly!
Oh and I enjoyed your trip down memory lane maclen. Put my feet up and popped a bag of popcorn-lol!
I guess country hound isn't in the loop - they are quoting the People article.
http://www.countryhound.com/Articles/1937/Nicole-and-Keith-Update-Starbucks-Peekaboo.aspx
People magazine reports today that Country Music star Keith Urban and wife Nicole Kidman were spotted at their local Franklin, Tennessee Starbucks this weekend, playing peekaboo with a toddler inside.
In the southern hemisphere, Australia hopes that Australia the film will help boost the Aussie economy, according to an AFP report today. Officials are hoping that Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman's latest venture will follow in the footsteps of the Crocodile Dundee cash boost from the '80s.
"This movie will potentially be seen by tens of millions of people and it will bring to life little-known aspects of Australia's extraordinary natural environment, history, and indigenous culture," Tourism Minister Martin Ferguson said at an industry conference this past weekend.
If the Aussies want revenue, perhaps they should look to Keith Urban. Ninemsn.com, an Australian division of MSN, reported yesterday that Aussies need to embrace Country Music. The article centers on an interview with Country Music singer Catherine Britt, who has spent the past six years in the United States, touring with Country Music stars such as Brooks and Dunn and Keith Urban.
"Keith has been a big supporter and took me on the road and, of course, he played on my record," Britt said. "He's just a lovely Aussie, genuine guy. There's nothing that has changed about him or become more up himself or anything like that."
Britt maintains the reaction to Country Music in Australia is not positive, a fact she hopes to change.
Meanwhile, over the weekend, the Aussies drudged up Kidman's past with ex-husband Tom Cruise, as two police investigations in the Gold Coast area have been dubbed "Kidman" and "Cruise." The investigation was looking into burglaries at chemist shops. A man has been charged with the crimes, but the police reportedly want to keep "Operation Kidman Cruise" as a continuous investigation for unsolved chemist burglaries.
Psycho So-Boring~ I thought you any your 2 other nut jobs said they hated the celeb trashing and your here to defend them. That's it's not so much because you idolize Nikkers skanky ass?
But, yet to try to make a point you trash another actress. One who is still up on your psycho wannabee actress. Cate can ACTUALLY act. And that fact is inarguable by an any intelligent person.
banbotox said...
"maclen said: they'll wait patiently for the phone call for their "exclusive".
Exactly!
Oh and I enjoyed your trip down memory lane maclen. Put my feet up and popped a bag of popcorn-lol!"
It isnt hard banbotox to root out the kidman leak pushers... considering they are only willing to try and portray a "successful" image of her, when it is obvious she is far from that... as for the little history lesson, another thing it shows is how incredibly long she has been allowed to display her mediocrity...or how those seemingly thick movie moguls, studio presidents, and directors who have lost their studios, jobs and careers for that matter, and continue to employ her even after all the cataclysm that follows in her wake. Take poor sucker daniel craig, for instance... ignorant enough to not only star in a would be "summer blockbuster" with kidman that turned out to be a total embarrasment... Invasion, but another major flop only a few months later...(I tell you, 2007 was exactly as it was in 2003) with the Compass debacle. Craig has now cursed the set of the next bond movie because the poor fool has contracted "kidman Kooties".
...ps...
..19 days so far in the perez hilton kidman silence .... "boy, the suspense is unbearable!!! I wonder how long it will last?"
yep, maclen.....another deal struck! wonder what he'll get for his silence!
Well doublewide, Ive ready commented that maybe he'll get a early tip on the name...something to look for in the future...Urban myths commented in this blog entry, maybe early tip on expected date. Either way, until hilton comes out with his usual snide entry, or just another milquetoast entry, something seems to be going on...what it is may be revealed.
sonora - just how long have you been working on that thesis? Shouldn't you have finished it by now?
Excuse me SM.Let me rephrase that.Everyone will see Kidman with the spawn ONCE when she has her happy family People cover shoot. Then she will toss it off to one of the army of nannies she will employ to make sure it doesn't bother her.Just like she did with Irma and Clayton. And Heaven help the nanny who can't keep the spawn from crying within ear shot of Kidmanzilla. There is that better for you Snore Melody?
"not anon said...
sonora - just how long have you been working on that thesis? Shouldn't you have finished it by now?"
I assume you have written a thesis before? So typical of the skeptics to render an opinion without supporting facts.
You actually think she reads this blog? Seriously, who's got the bigger ego here? She doesn't give a Rats Ass about this blog.
sonora_melody said...
"not anon said...
sonora - just how long have you been working on that thesis? Shouldn't you have finished it by now?"
I assume you have written a thesis before? So typical of the skeptics to render an opinion without supporting facts.
Actually I have written one.
So again I ask - just how long have you been working on your thesis? Care to share the title of you paper? I really am curious. I'm finding your research methods very interesting. It's obvious your not a silent observer just here to gather data.
Not anon - Not a nun? Nut anon?
You're not my professor, thesis advisor nor member of my thesis panel. It's none of your business what my thesis is about.
If you really have written a thesis, you should know better than to ask me about mine.
sonora_melody - such a witty play on words. Let me guess - you attend NKU. I hear they have a great on line program.
Not Anon/Nut Anon:
I'm not attending NKU - North Kentucky Univ? Northern Kansas Univ? North Korea Univ? North Kazakhstan Univ?
No idea if they have any online programs. Anyway, it's none of your business which program I attend.
snore melody - I hope once you finish your thesis you'll publish it on line. I'm sure it will be riveting work.
"not anon said...
I hope once you finish your thesis you'll publish it on line. I'm sure it will be riveting work."
As I'm still working on mine, perhaps you should post yours first, as you mentioned you already did one. :)
Post a Comment