Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Kidman Hits Vanity Fair Again... WHY OH WHY?

Just a note to begin: Urban Myths is written by many fine people of either gender. There is no main writer nor are they primarily male or female. Those that are choosing to judge this blog should take a moment and reflect on what they publicly post, as do we.

Where do we start with Vanity Fair? Let's go back to the October 2006 issue. Who was on the cover? C'mon you know it... Miss Suri Cruise making her national debut. And one year later we see Nicole Kidman busting out all over to yet again call attention to her private life. The “oh so private” Kidman opens up about the one true love of her life, Tom Cruise. I don't want to bore you, but I have to ask… how desperate is this woman to get her former husband’s attention? Apparently, he is the “be all, end all.”

We all have that Great Love in our lives. Nicole, he has moved on to a younger, prettier and more fertile woman. They have Suri, a cutie beyond compare. The new missus even likes the children you have ignored. Get over it. You aren't going to have his baby… but you did say you tried. Now we are hearing of an early miscarriage. No, not the famous miscarriage at the end of the marriage but a miscarriage at the start.

Why did we never hear of this before? I find it interesting, considering both Kidman and Mr. Cruise have had questions aplenty thrown around about their ability to have children. Why not mention it sometime in that 11 years you were married? Another revelation is that people told Kidman that she would have no career if she married Cruise. Well, Well, Well… Do they think we don't remember when Kidman and Cruise met? Do you recall? Wasn't it on a movie set for Days of Thunder and Tom Cruise was married at the time to Mimi Rogers, yet Kidman chose to have an affair with him? Yeah, a new actress…if I was your manager and you were having an affair with the number one box office star, I would say “be careful” -- right! Kidman also hit Ladies Home Journal again and splewed her verbiage about the great love of her life, saying she has no regrets about her time with Tom. I wouldn't either. In the end she got world wide fame, millions in the bank and several houses and a plane. She did okay…I would love Tom too. Actually I like Mr. Cruise a great deal and could never understand the Kidman phase.

Let’s continue on about Kidman. She was engaged before Keith Urban. Let’s see… that means that someone found her attractive and that Keith almost got away. Rumors are that it was Stephen Bing, a reliable mate for the future. Or Lenny Kravitz, a man who holds my utmost respect for dumping Kidman. So someone wanted her. Okay, if you say so, Nicole.

But what about Keith? Apparently when they met there weren't any fireworks. Really??? Is that why you chased him around G’Day LA trying to give him your number? Is that why you pursued him through his people when after six months he still hadn't called you? He was lonely? Ask the woman that he was dating when you had your first PR date? And now eight months later Keith says a baby in 2008 would be nice. More than a month after Keith said we're not trying? It's Keith who doesn't want to have a baby. Kidman shows in the photo with niece/prop baby that yeah, she wants a baby. She is shown now for the third time with that baby. Look at the photo of Kidman and the baby. The baby is hidden in her coat. Hidden in her coat -just like a year ago when Suri was hidden in Tom's coat. Yes, Nicole, Suri exists. It doesn't matter if you want to put your ta-tas out there and tell us how much your current husband wants to worship only you and not share you with an infant…Tom has moved on. I can only wish that the media would do the same and, most of all, I hope Keith does, too. It seems like the ground work is being laid for the blame game. That’s okay - we are still on to Kidman. Wasn't it this blog that predicted the focus would become Nicole Kidman “the woman”? It reads more like Nicole Kidman the fraud...

20 comments:

maclen said...

Yes I believe, Urban Myths, your comment on the fist pic on the home page says it all..."Where did Keith go?"
By contrast, in the tomkat-suri VF issue, kidman is mentioned only once, i believe, when they refer to connor and bella, who they simply state the kids cruise adopted with ex-wife nicole kidman. Thats it.
Of the few quotes Ive seen online of the article, she says about urban, she states, "Keith knows I want one,(baby) and he has been getting there slowly,"...yeah meaning he's in no rush to have one with her...no surprise! Also, she says she described urban's rehab stint "painful", and that she's "learned an enormous amount having a relationship with someone who is in recovery."
Boy, what passion! What emotion they must possess for each other, I'm surprised they dont have 10 kids already!
Yes, Urban Myths, where did Keith go?

banbotox said...

I think that the entire VF interview is an embarrassment not only to Keith but to women in general. From the cheap trick cover to her constant rambling on about Tom. I really wish Tom would call her and tell her to shut up already-move on Nic. You are married to someone else and you are 40 years old. Grow up!
I would love to see the faces on the folks at UNIFEM when they see that issue.

Perspone said...

And that brings up another subject altogether, What has Ms. Kidman done for UNIFEM lately? I know that all her time is being taken up with work on her latest epic failure, but honestly Ms. Kidman your not even making a token effort to fullfill the duties of your title.

doublewide said...

And that brings up another subject altogether, What has Ms. Kidman done for UNIFEM lately? I know that all her time is being taken up with work on her latest epic failure, but honestly Ms. Kidman your not even making a token effort to fullfill the duties of your title.

that is because she is the GREAT NICOLE KIDMAN, she doesn't have to make even a slight effort.....why, you know, commoners aren't even allowed to gaze upon her....

she is one hypocritical, desperate, shrew

don't believe the lies said...

Isn't her UNIFEM responsibility to help abused women? The cover picture isn't exactly one that would express that. She looks like a desperate skank.

The comments in the interview are quite eye opening. It's soooooo obvious that she is NOT over Tom. Perhaps a bit obsessed?!?!? She makes Keith look like such an idiot. Will he ever realize that being married to her has and will continue to do more harm than good? Also the thought of them having a child is laughable. The only hope I found is that Keith seems to be holding out? He just needs to stay in this mindset and NOT let her convince him to do somthing he obvioulsy doesn't want to do....at least not with her.

maclen said...

Perspone said...
"And that brings up another subject altogether, What has Ms. Kidman done for UNIFEM lately?"

Dont you rememeber perspone she was at that White Ribbon Event for unifem in Oz last month, where she had to put on a designer prom dress, and try a new altering hair length wig, and join the banquet for charity...and before that, remember she went to Kosovo, in oct '06, almost a few year before? And thats it... Yeah, she is positively tireless in her UNIFEM duties!

This VF cover, with all these "revelations" smacks of desperate opportunism. The relelations are not even anything new. She had a miscarriage after the split? Yeah, it was included in the divorce papers, smokinggun.com published the divorce forms... oh, she had a miscarriage soon after their marriage? That was 17 years ago, and people will care, why? She was engaged post cruise and pre urban? yeah, the rumors were flying from the rags when she went out wearing a huge diamond ring on her engagement ring, back in 2003, when she hooked up with lenny kravitz for about 15 minutes. Right, big mystery there! This is all old recycled news, and this VP issue is a one day story... she'll get the usual segment on all the entertainment shows, and then they'll move on to real entertainment news, like say, Halle Berry is actually pregnant, and not droning endlessly that she really really wants to be preganant.
And just take note, kidmans next movie doesnt even come out for 2 more months... will anybody even notice?

don't believe the lies said...

With this "revelation" of her being engaged previously, I wonder if the mystery man...aka Lenny Kravitz...will step forward with some opinions of his own. After all she brought it up and threw it out there for public consumption. It would be interesting to hear his side. BTW, I'm glad Lenny got away. He was smart!

notachance said...

When did the engagement to Lenny become a "mystery man" engagement? Everyone knew about it. Even the Stephen Bing "engagement", short lived as it was was still common knowledge. Who the hell is she kidding? And will the tabloid tv shows play along with this? They were the ones that reported these "engagements".

Imahick said...

Very classy cover page, Ms Kidman. Why would an A list actress with teenage kids do a cover like that. It's ridiculous and exploitive. Interesting choice for the UNIFEM ambassador for women's rights.

As far as NK wanting children and Keith being the hold out...well, of course that's how she'll present it. She's been working non-stop and is continuing to do so. But to deflect any blame from herself, she's making sure that she publically announces that it's KEITH who doesn't want babies right now. And he's depriving her of her of what she desires most...that selfish beast. She's a master at the sympathy card!

She sure shows alot of love and admiration for her husband...oh...right, I mean her X husband. She seems to have accepted the pain and suffering that her actual current husband has put her through...it was a very very very bad and painful time. But Tom...he was the cat's meow.

Why does Keith gush about her and what she's done for him, and she doesn't even have the decency to give him some credit for getting sober and remaining clean & sober.

She is one of the most self absorbed, narcissitic individuals out there. Thank God, Keith has the where with all to realize that bringing a child into this union after he has just been through 90 days of rehab and within months of this union being on shakey ground is inappropriate. She is indeed a selfish, thoughtless person.

Urbanfan4ever said...

Maybe Keith is shooting blanks? Looks to me like after all the "so called" drunken drug sex parties someone would have had a little Urban bun in the oven by now.
Either that or KU has been religious about using a rain coat.
It's good to know he is holding out on Nic. I think bringing a baby into this marriage is a bad idea.
Anyone that's been a KU fan for years, can now see how sad he looks. He is not the same man. His eyes look cold and dead. Where did that sparkle go?
Thank God he still comes alive while on stage. That is where KU is truly happy. I think music will always be his first love. Nicole can not take that away. It's in his heart and soul.

maclen said...

In the previous thread, I was welcomed to the Urban "Skeptics" by Urban Myths, as any initial sympathy i had for urban was dwindling away. It's rather obvious by now, that urban does not call many shots in this marriage. He structures his tour so he can have time to fly into any movie set shes on, it seems she wont travel to be with him. She's able to lament in every print and tv interview about how she regrets being dumped by cruise, do you think Urban is allowed to even speak of his past relationships to the media? Even if it pertains to his addiction problems? Has anyone ever seen a quote from him like that? As for his reluctance to having a baby right now, I agree its just her cover story, if she were able to have a baby, she would of had one by now, like when cruise had his...instead she's reduced to borrowing her sister's baby to try and keep up with cruise. So basically, I dont acually believe urban even has that to have a say in.

maclen said...

I just had to comment about the faithful fans reaction to this VF issue. It's pretty hilaroius over at the NKU message board... most of the faithful were, "What's all the fuss?" a few were "Why still all the talk about cruise?" And then that kind of faded to full devotion again... now their beginning to whine about negative reviews of Margot at the wedding. Seems Margot lost her mojo at Telleride. And of course, through it all, its not kidman's fault, its Vanity Fair and the media who are sensationalizing her revelations, they are blowing it out of proportion... very funny stuff, but the blind devotion can get a little creepy, its true, but still funny.

banbotox said...

So Margot is just another, let me put it gently, FLOP?
And it's not even been released yet?
My, oh my.....

maclen said...

Margot at the wedding is another indie picture, making the festival rounds, looks like with no support from kidman, she wasnt at telluride, not scheduled to be at the Toronto Film fest. Its coming out in limited release in Nov. Anticipated before telluride, got mediocre buzz during, not mentioned very much now. I'd be confortable saying it is a another dud. Vanity Fair wont do very much for it, with two months to go.

don't believe the lies said...

I am going out on a limb here as to predict that woman will never be in another successful film again. It's called Karma and it's a bitch!

maclen said...

don't believe the lies said...
"I am going out on a limb here as to predict that woman will never be in another successful film again. It's called Karma and it's a bitch!"

Interesting you mention Karma...looking at the bleak outlook of Margot at the wedding, an indie pic, for new sensation director,Noah baumbach, of squid an the whale fame just 2 years ago. If you recall, her past 2 other indie films, Fur and Birth also were failures. Both were for recently hot, new on the scene, directors, steven shainberg and jonathon glazer, respectively. Also add to that, her last 3 summer movie blockbusters also went bust. So their might be something to that last statement. So the lesson of this story is, if you just had a smash breakthrough indie flick, dont hire kidman to make your second movie, you will never be heard from again.

cricket said...

Just go away Nicold Kidless! No one cares to see your frozen face and tiny tatas on magazine covers anymore.No one cares that you still love Tom Cruise,especially Tom.He dumped your bony butt and married a much younger,prettier,talented,fertile woman.He doesn't waste time thinking about you at all.No one cares about what happened to you 17 years ago.That Vainty Fair cover is not going to entice any one to see one of your box-office bombs. The only things people want to know about you now are the following questions:HOw many times a day do you have to shoot up Botox to maintain that frozen waxy vacent look on your face?Is that restalyne or collegen in your fishy looking lips?Can you close your mouth,or are your lips to big? Who has had more plastic surgery and skin bleaching you or Michael Jackson? When is Keith Urban going to realize he married a corpse that is ruining his career,and kick your bony ass to the curb just like Tom did? That's what people want to know Nicold.

maclen said...

Cricket, "Nicold Kidless"? That is hilarious... and you pretty much said it all...

Anna said...

I love your blog! Awesome. I don't HATE Nicole with a passion I just despise the whole hypocrisy surrounding her which is why I started "Nicole Kidman's Forhead". Please let me know if you stumble upon any recent photos of Nicole (bad ones of course!) I will do the same when I find photos of Nic and Keith. You are always welcome to copy photos I have on my site.
Thanks

http://nicolekidmansforhead.blogspot.com

Urban Myths said...

Anna, if you contact me through my profile, I will send you some pics. I can't figure out how to contact you through your blog. Thanks...

UM