Thursday, December 4, 2008

And a Babe Shall Lead Us from the Darkness...

Oh, you thought this was going to be about the exploitation of young Sunday Rose Kidman Urban? Nope, not at all. What can you say about a mother who is so weak, so fearful of being a failure that she will exploit, no the better term here, is whore out her child to garner attention? The sad thing about this, beyond young Sunday being taken out in the cold without proper covering, is that everyone figured it out. Gee, Nicole are you concussed again? How stupid are you to throw that baby out into the open for the mass media? Yes, stupid because the timing was off. Every one knows that the epic is not the epic it was intended to be, so like pulling out your little Suri with the fringe on top, you pull out Sunday. Sad.

Today, however we are going to take the subject away from the baby and talk again about the baby daddy. First of all Keith Urban is an imbecile for letting his daughter be exploited like that. Is it so rough to live with Nicole that you have to kowtow to her every whim? Does she have something over you that will ruin your career so that you act like an ass? We saw your balls through your pants the other night in Paris - why not use them, darling?

Thinking about the way Keith has been acting lately made me think about Keith Urban, Movie Star. Do you remember that he had a movie contract at one time? Actually, it was announced one week before he and Kidman were spotted biking together. What happened to that? Was there a better contract that he signed? There was that rumor that he tested very poorly, that his accent was too thick. I think he is a great actor. I mean, how can he live with that bitch and pretend to be happy over and over again? Well, on second thought, and given his appearance recently, maybe he is bad actor after all.

Finally, we want to welcome back our friend Anna from the Forehead blog. We have missed you; and please note karma only applies to Kidman - she has built up so much vile that her karma wipes out any of our ill will toward her. One thing however, is that Ted Casablanca is not done. He is the king of pounce and like the sleek cat he is, he waits until he knows the time is right before he gives us the dirt. We are lucky to have him around. Make sure you all read his latest column... *wink wink*

26 comments:

maclen said...

Just as it is a given for me that kidman, as I wrote in the last tread...that kidman is a very self absorbed...self centered...overly dramatic and overly indulgant, self consciously and publically embarrassing "showy" attention starved celeb...to the exact extreme to her is the orb... a spineless...characterless...mass of emotional and physical glutton to his personal vice's...opinionless and so readily conforming to simply be reduced to being her "diaper bag boy...and of course, for the benifit of the papparatzi's lens ...a silly grinning fool. So it doesnt surpise me at all that just the sheer fact that the association with kidman could so easily derail his career and reduce him to the basically "non entity" state he is now been placed in...

Lisa said...

Where is said picture of said balls????

I'm getting eye strain and my elbows are killing me. I cannot find it!!!

ShutUpAndSing said...

Well.. maybe if he had any left you could see them.

For some reason, the material on these pants seem very see though. He must be getting fashion tips from his fashion icon skankywhore wife:)

http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrities/hollywood/nicole-kidman-and-hugh-jackman-double-date-209387/

Choice said...

KEITH: That doesn't look good placing two objects in your tight trousers pockets. Oops, that is something else. What a big boy!
Surprised Gran didn't make you put them in your coat pocket.

I am now convinced that neither of them are style icons. Did you see what Nicole wore to the Spain Premiere? A kid's dress:

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2008/12/from-spain-to-rome-next-stop-siberia.html

realitycheck said...

karma only applies to Kidman

What a way to justify your nasty thoughts on this blog. You all must be living in an alternate universe. There's no other way to explain it.

And about Ted C. once again he delivers nothing. Antonia has been photographed and there was never any sign of a pregnancy at all. Ted apparently has sunk to your level Umyths, which is why you are promoting such a sudden kinship with him. Rehash old rumors that have zero validity and hand out false promises of delivering "the truth". Kidman haters have been saying on random message boards that Antonia had the baby. So Ted you have no scoop. Umyths you have no scoop. You fail once again.

Choice said...

I was reading one of the comments on that TED article and noticed the hermaphrodite thing mentioned again (Lainey often refers to it). I think that is how all the surrogate rumours came up because Nic couldn't have a baby in the 11 years she was with Tom. I realise she claims she had miscarriages etc, but who will ever really know if that is true. It just seemed so odd to be able to suddenly get pregnant at 40, and while filming 'Australia'.

The hermaphrodite rumour is pretty mean, but I think it also came about because of her boyish frame and no breasts. And then there was the doctor who knew a doctor who knew a specialist ...

Imahick said...

Ted hasn't revealed all yet, RC. NK has made such an issue about her fertility ... I wouldn't be surprised if there was a surrogate and it was Antonia's egg.

The pictures of Sunday show a very large child for 5 mo. She's more like 7 or 8 months. Maybe this was Antonia's egg, and Sunday was born in May ... and that's why there were no pictures in the beginning, because they couldn't hide her age in the earlier pictures, but now, it's harder to pinpoint an age.

I'm not saying this is true, but this is one theory and there are many possibilities. Face it, with NK, anything is possible. She learned from the master and she is so anxious to continue to be in the press, she will do anything she can. Having pictures of Sunday in the media is a great way to divert attetntion from her latest flop.

She didn't mind taking the child out in cold weather without a coat or hat and she didn't mind being photographed in a car carrying the baby on her lap instead of in a car seat. The child's well being is entirely secondary to NK's need for attention.

This blog was criticized in the past for comparing NK to Britany Spears. I can see now why that's the case. Britany was essentially skewered in the press for holding her baby on her lap while in a car...NK gets a pass. Britany actually lost custody of her kids for not acting in their best interests...NK is immune. I have great empathy for this child. She looks startled and uncomfortable with NK, as if she's unfamiliar with NK. I wonder why???

Urban Myths said...

Umyths you have no scoop. You fail once again.

Ahhhhh, but ... you keep reading AND responding...

maclen said...

So I'm watching Celebrity Rehab on VH1, and I see another tv spot of the movie Twilight...and it occured to me that there haven't been any tv spots for Australia...that I noticed anyways...and with the next 3 day movie weekend coming up, I wondered just how will Australia will do. Over at box office mojo, Australia grossed $985k on monday.....$1.0mil on tuesday and $906k on wednesday for a totol of $22.9mil...and then figure thursday another $900k for a total of maybe $24mil. going into the 3 day weekend. In a previous thread I hypothesized that Australia may only gross about 50% of last weekend gross of $14.8mil and make another $7.4mill for a possible 11 day total of $31mil...which I also pointed out would just barely beat out Four Christmas' 3 day totol of about 30 mil. But if Australia doesnt at least gross 50%...it might not outgross FC's 3 day totals...so an interesting question for me this weekend, will it?

notachance said...

I know I'm gonna get all kinds of crap for this, but what the hell....

What about all the women who brought kids to KU shows knowing full well that they stood a better chance of KU seeing/recogizing/getting on stage etc. because they brought their kid? AHEM, any difference between them and NK?

And I'm sure there's a skeptic or two who have done just that.

Lisa said...

My cat refused to sit still and wear the sweater.....

Lisa said...

so we got kicked out....



No, I'm only joking.

No kids here. Concerts wouldnt be a place I would take them anyways. They've seemed to change so much. Even big bird on ice doing a split in the air cant be trusted nowadays.

maclen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
maclen said...

Yeah, just as the orb is the ultimate and unrelenting tool..kidman is the ultimate and unrelenting "Karpenter of Kretins"... for only in Lainey gossip would you get this very lucid take on kidman's moronic and uncontrolable and in this case, very dangerous play for her desperate attention mongering..

http://www.laineygossip.com/Nicole_Kidman_allowed_to_ride_in_car_carrying_daughter_Sunday_Rose_without_car_seat_.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0

"Carseats don’t photograph well"

"Self promotion > child safety…"
"After all, if Granny Freeze had had Sunday Rose in a car seat, the paps would not have been able to pull off such a good shot. And above all things, Nicole Kidman must be seen as a doting mother, a woman transformed by her beautiful little girl.
Which is why no one has bothered to call her out on it.
It’s one thing for Chicken Fried Britney to do it – we’ll nail that hick to the wall every time she f-cks up. But somehow, some way, they will find an excuse for old Gran. Old Gran would never intend to endanger her baby, oh no."

...as lainey states...you wont see this or read that in People mag...only until the poor baby gets injured because kidman is a shameless and desperate PR troll who's obvious "mother's concern" is trumped by the fact her inane film is a flop!
...yet clooney can blame the paps for the death of princess Diana...this brain dead, botox abusing, collogen abuser, baby exploiting and shameless attention mongering shill is blinded by the need to keep herself in the limelight! Yeah, keep smiling wide for the paps...moron...and just hope that someone..anyone else just hopes or prays your poor baby doesnt get her head bashed into the dashboard...and you gotta wonder if anyone one of her ass kissing, sycophantic yes men/women staff would ever be concerned enough to mention it?

maclen said...

...so heres an aussie take on it...

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24757227-5012980,00.html


"Nicole Kidman nurses an unrestrained Sunday Rose in hire car"

Just as she's willing to shill for chanel and gameboy only in "foreign markets"..no doubt she is willing to endanger her kid in lands with "lienient" carseat laws...and in her pea sized, botox fried brain...she feels that makes it alright....

TexasCourtJester said...

How quickly NK forgot her injured ribs & getting concussed in the car accident on the set of Invasion reshoots. That was, what, one? two years ago at the most? And yet she can have Keith photographed carrying a car seat but they can't be bothered to use one. This isn't the first time either. There were pictures months ago of SR in NK's lap in the car - no car seat in sight - but nobody cared then either.

Casse Role said...

I have to agree with Imahick on the age of the baby. I also thought she looked a bit big for 5 months. The photos of her carrying the baby seem a little "off" too.
IMO, she just doesn't seem comfortable.

Imahick said...

NK is above the law. Whatever has to be done for the perfect shot. You know that they wouldn't get such a good view if the child was in a car seat. Really...you don't expect the ice queen to put HER child in a car seat, do you?

As far as people using their kids to get Keith's attention, I agree it's done and I am not happy when I see it. I've seen little kids who clearly are bothered by the noise and even exhausted, being pimped at Keith's shows. So...that's is not something I enjoy.

But it doesn't excuse NK's behavior. There is NO excuse for endangering a child's life for some publicity.

And here I thought NK was very medical.

Choice said...

Nicole must be reading our Blogs. The baby at least had a hat on her head (the first time since she was born no doubt:

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2008/12/youre-allowed-to-see-me-now.html

realitycheck said...

All this focus on NK and this is a Keith Urban blog? Where's the mention from ANYONE of his Grammy nomination?

Umyths you have no scoop. You fail once again.

Ahhhhh, but ... you keep reading AND responding...


I'm waiting for "the truth" you promised and still haven't delivered. LMAO

And the to the poster that said that Ted hasn't revealed everything yet? Fat chance. He promised the big scoop after "Australia" opened and it was nothing we haven't heard before. If Ted comes out and says he heard there was a surrogate we've heard that before too. Even if he gives us a crazy story about how she still has ties to the Co$ and she got a baby from them it still won't be anything blog/board readers haven't heard or seen before. Ted wants to draw this out and make himself look more in-the-know than he really is.

Choice said...

Hi Reality check
The reason the board focusses more on Granny is because Keith's career is now intertwinned with hers. You can't get Keith alone anymore, she is part of the equation. It's now Keith Kidman, didn't you know. He does as he is told. Have a look at the latest photo's of him and you will see why he is her handbag. Won't be long now until she is a backup singer in his band:

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2008/12/youre-allowed-to-see-me-now.html

C

Casse Role said...

Choice said...

Won't be long now until she is a backup singer in his band:

BITE YOUR TONGUE!

Casse Role said...

Of course these question may go unanswered but RC, what makes you think that the things that have been posted here aren't the truth??

Are you saying that you have inside information?... Were you the doctor or midwife involved in her birth? Are you the nanny, or housekeeper, or neighbor with a big telescope?

Just HOW do you know that nothing is the truth here? Instead of playing games, why not just come forward and tell us why you are really here, and why you think we should listen to you. You want the microphone, but you don't sing.
You want credit, but you won't take the test.

As if it were a Miss America contest... here is your question.
Give us some reasons why you should win?...

Anna said...

Thanks for welcoming me back guys, love to you all. xxx

TexasCourtJester said...

"Where's the mention from ANYONE of his Grammy nomination?"

Why should we bother - he sure as heck didn't? It was for a duet on another artist's album that wasn't released as a single and therefore no video and no promotion for the song at all. Let's face it, as talented as Tricia is she is no Garth and never will be. If "Start a Band" had been released earlier that might have been nomination worthy - and might be next year. There's no way Tricia's label can compete with the other nominations to pull out a win. Keith didn't perform last year but then you can't perform if you don't bother to show up. I doubt he'll be asked to perform this year. Even though it looks like his "international" tour for the first quarter of 2009 has been canceled or at least postponed I doubt he'll attend this year either. Unless of course Nic is bored and wants a spotlight to show off her unmentionables again.

wastedemotion said...

Hey did anyone hear Keith got nominated for a Grammy?!
Wonder how much that cost?!
Happy RC?!