Thursday, July 8, 2010

Keith Urban doesn't need to make videos anymore...

In the following interview with a Denver radio station, Mr. Urban first talks about how he had to forego Father's Day in honor of Baby Girl Kidman's birthday. Then, when asked when his new video will be out for his latest single (which is #7 on the Billboard charts this week - believe it or not), he said he hasn't even thought about a video yet. He's been SO busy recording and touring. What a joke.

Go to the Audio On-Demand section: http://www.kygo.com/paulDonovan/

70 comments:

maclen said...

Yes, no doubt the monkeys in monkeyland, who always salivate...and gripe... about how there is never a video to go with his endless singles from the lackluster Defying Sales...are then reduced to "fantasizing" about what the video would be about or what they believe it should be about! As for that "skipped father's day" PR BS, kidman already knocked that bunk out of the water in her press release to People.com...so that is just ridiculously and patently idiotic! Catering to his monkeybase with lame 30 sec "exclusive" videos and gouging them with jacked up and scalped tickets or the occasional giveaways is gonna keep the flock from a further mass "exodus" from the fansie site.

martingano said...

I like to know what the excuse will be when he foregos the Oz version of Father's Day. He booked a show for that day in CT.

blue sky said...

Busy touring? I laughed hard on that one! Father's Day in America and the Queen's birthday have passed. Keith, could you please move on and discuss something else during radio interviews like maybe your career? Oh, pardon me, how could I forget, your wife is your career!

maclen said...

HA! The "chatter" in this thread is soooooo deafening! Clearly must be the case...as specified by hoosier...."If you cant say anything nice, dont say anything at all?" Yeah...that's the ticket!
Very enlightening, blue sky...

" blue sky said...
"Oh, pardon me, how could I forget, your wife is your career!

That truly is what it appears to be coming down to these days, isnt it? Certainly far more than earlier this year...when kidman was NOT in the orb's promo and NOT mentioned when he started back onto the festival and county fair circuit. It's quite obvious that orb is the only one throwing kidman any bones these days...well outside of HBO and some startup studio. I clearly believe the monkeys will not respond very positively to it...as so many did not when it initially came up after the union... and has not abated up to this moment!

hoosierlady said...

The Thunder From Down Under?

Wasn't that a marketing slogan for Imodium?

A440 said...

In keeping with his mention of Sunday, there is lots of PR about what he wants for her in terms of life values. From a radio interview:

“My biggest thing for us is to instill a work ethic. That’s the thing that is most problematic for me right now is this unwillingness to have a work ethic. And the ability to access information so quickly makes people think that their ability to achieve something is also meant to be expedited, but it doesn’t work that way. It’s never gonna work that way, and if we are going to build something solid, it’s going to be built slowly, step by step by step, not only for its solidity but for an understanding of why it is what it is. We get a sense of who we are, and there’s nothing sweeter than having to work for something. It’s a tremendous feeling.”

Okay, ostensibly, he's talking about a career. I agree with him about being disciplined. Being willing to get your hands dirty and do the scut work is all fine and good.

So why do I get the feeling he's alluding to his marriage?

maclen said...

A440 said...
"So why do I get the feeling he's alluding to his marriage?"

Yeah, clearly because he alludes to "they"...

"if we are going to build something solid, it’s going to be built slowly, step by step by step..."

"We get a sense of who we are, and there’s nothing sweeter than having to work for something."

Clearly, unless the orb considers himself royalty...the impression is clear. And clearly, this is a pre written "answer"he's simply memorized...orb comes off analytically "complex' in that quote...like he's reading from a philosophy text. Not convincing.

smorgas91 said...

Didn't know he was capable of making allusion let alone that kind of speech....

If he is astute, probably not, but it is possible that he realizes his wife's career is in trouble so feels the need to mention her in all his gigs to support her...maybe not a pathetic lovesick puppy...maybe both....

hoosierlady said...

It is my understanding from this site that his career was just more or less taking off prior to the holy unnion, therefore, did he build it step by step, or did he try to jump a few, (by way of the union), thereby making his statement a little what is the word. . . contradictory?

Looking at it from the other angle, that of the union itself being the subject, they've been married at whopping 4 years. In the grand scheme of things, (speaking as a 28 year veteran of the war, from the bunker still), there shouldn't be such strife so early on. There aren't the usual things, money, school tuition, choice of religion for the kiddies, "don't come home after you've been drinking with those friends of yours", etc. The most these two have to deal with is dodging the paps, (laughable), her obsession with her ex, his obsession with "the real thing", and/or the drink that makes white people think they can dance, maybe a little tension regarding the inlaws and whether to drive the Bentley or to have one of the countless staff drive them.
These people, take themselves too seriously, but, that's what we get when we give Barbie and Ken voiceboxes.
Send them up here, they can hang out with the other half and see how REAL married people build a life worth living, and maybe, just maybe, they'll end up with something worth instilling, instead of this drivel they dribble out for their tired, hungry, huddle masses yearning to be duped.
And one more thing, before my headache takes over completely, work ethic? This guy plays the guitar and writes songs for a living.
I can hear his father screaming from here.

hoosierlady said...

I'm sorry, Urban Myths,

Love, Love, Love what you've done with the place!

And so quickly! You must have worked all night!

mikki said...

An update for you maclen:

http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2010/07/cracking-teaser-poster-for-john-cameron.html

Urban Myths said...

Thanks, Hoosier! Still tweaking it a bit. Thought we needed a change.

BTW, Keith says they were in the Bahamas, and his "little girl" turned 2 years old.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdhJ_KEayHY

Laura said...

Someone please explain to me how this is newsworthy? What's the big deal about this?

smorgas91 said...

It doesn't have to be newsworthy or worthy for discussion or interesting or make sense based on one individual opinion. This is a blog site, we come and go as we please, if the thread is interesting or newsworthy or make sense to bloggers, then we comment however and whatever we want...you certainly can choose to read/not read, but no one makes the rules on how, when or what to blog....go somewhere else then

abc said...

Laura, Keith thinks it is newsworthy!!!!!!! and obviously Nicole too!!!!! he has repeated it how many times??

I find it completely ridiculous to forego "thinking about being a father" on father's day when it is only his second and the baby is SUCH a big deal for them, and the birthday is her 43rd! Actually, I find it even more inane needing to tell the world about it.

I feel (guess) that when Keith went into rehab, a deal was struck with (by) his Babygirl & Daddy; I bet she/they told him she would "stand by him" and support him on condition that he do the tings she wants and needs; now we know she can and does buy, or is given/donated, just about everything she needs and wants, but the one thing she can't buy is "positive opinion" (apart from the loaded official PR), so that is why he shills her at EVERY opportunity - to keep her 'happy' and the ashtrays in place, and, given she is his 'muse', he needs to keep his 'product' shiny, his 'prize' seemingly valuable. Furthermore, (Laura, shut your eyes!) I have an increasing feeling that he is not the father (i.e. the sperm/seed) of Sunday. Many things make me feel that which I won't go into, just sufface to say it has amounted to my gut feeling about that. I think too that it was part of the 'rehab deal'. He had also said he wanted to wait a year or so to have a baby, then suddenly, there it was.

Ok Laura, you can open your eyes now.

;)

hoosierlady said...

smorgas91 said...
It doesn't have to be newsworthy or worthy for discussion or interesting or make sense based on one individual opinion. This is a blog site, we come and go as we please, if the thread is interesting or newsworthy or make sense to bloggers, then we comment however and whatever we want...you certainly can choose to read/not read, but no one makes the rules on how, when or what to blog....go somewhere else then


SING IT SISTER

A440 said...

abc, I think the child is his biologically. She does look similar to what he did when he was a child. And I've read too many accounts of her pregnancy to discount that Nic is the mother.

Now, did she get pregnant out of some great love for family and children? Not a freakin' chance. She did it (via Clomid) to burnish her public image as the Perfect Woman who can do anything...actor, business woman, fashion plate, fertile mom at 41. She did it, in part, to thumb her nose at the Gay Midget Dwarf Who Divorced Her.

My question, to shift gears a bit, is why we've not been inundated with promo of what The Aussie Power Couple (tm) got each other for their recent celebrations. In years past, it was lots of PR about aromatherapy candles and vintage Mustangs. This year it's ... dinner out?

Why the radio silence? That's so unlike Queenie.

smorgas91 said...

A440 said "...And I've read too many accounts of her pregnancy to discount that Nic is the mother."
Right, she was dogged with rampant bizarre pregnancy rumors -- fake pregnancy, weird womb development, shape, odd size, need to be seen working out (this need to be seen stopped completely after birth -- go figure), sister likely is the surrogate, etc. etc. just couldn't show her stomach and get it over with, shut the hell out of all of them? She's an exhibitionist, has no problems exposing herself including full-frontal. She could NOT ONCE expose her tummy to shut them all up. It's as simple as that. She's since exposed her flabby tummy area...guess we're led to believe that was due to pregnancy. It's more logical if true that one would try to get rid of it in fervor after prenancy. It's as though that area is kept flabby to show us wrong or something -- after the fact. To this day, there are rumors about her bizarre pregnancy. It seems to me the act itself of faking pregnancy and acting it out is one of the bizarrest acts of her life on a global scale. That's in Michael Jackson realm. And even that wasn't credible acting....

A440 said...

Ah, but she did expose herself in public. In the park with her trainer, where she pulled up her shirt handily. The paps caught her at it. I remember those photos.

There are simply too many civilians who don't have a dog in this fight who say they saw her exposed in Yoga class, who saw her, in the words of one poster, "huffing and puffing all over Nashville" during the pregnancy. All those visits to the hospital and OB/GYNs here and in Oz, and the delivery itself were bogus?

Even bizarro-world media-whore actresses get pregnant.

A440 said...

Her belly isn't flabby in an effort to show herself post- pregnancy, it's flabby because, despite her frantic exercise schedule, she is now 43 and unable to get back to the body she had when she was 23.

Remember the press about how she was dancing for hours a day immediately after the delivery, in prepping for that classique du cinema, "Nine"? How she had her dance coach staying at the house? The end result was...what?

A flabby middle. A bigger butt. No doubt she's thrilled with that. Even with her present workout schedule, she still looks soft around the middle and wider in her tush.

She can invest in L'Wren Scott fashion all she wants, all she's doing is covering up a body that's showing the mileage she's accrued.

mikki said...

Is faking a pregnancy/using a surrogate really all that uncommon in Hollywood? Why would a celebrity fake a pregnancy rather than admit to a surrogate (as Sarah Jessica Parker did)? Publicity of course. Guaranteed publicity. My own opinion, no way was NK ever pregnant. Most telling reason, that Flynet paparazzi beating. Why did NK and her trainer steal the paparazzi's camera? Only to tell him where it could be found - minus the film. That paparazzi got pictures of something NK didn't want the public to see. A flat stomach perhaps?

I've always believed that the child could be a Kidman courtesy of the sister. But have to agree with abc about the father.

smorgas91, NK has always had a stomach on her. Check out the courtship pictures. She often looked pregnant. She has said that she has a stomach on her as do her mother and sister.

mikki said...

A440, those pictures in the park were taken early on and looked no different than someone sticking out their stomach. Sightings? Gotta tell ya A440, NK has some crazy fans who "see" lots of things. Bella & Connor often in Nashville for instance. And weren't you just a little suspicious when Keith AND HIS LAWYER showed up for one of those OB/GYN appointments?? We'll never know the truth, but my opinion, fake all the way.

smorgas91 said...

Several other facts -- in the early 90's she underwent a surgery and was in UCLA hospital for several days due to per cruise a "female illness", dogged rumor of hermaphrodite and that she had no uterus, and cruise mentioning shortly after their divorce that she could not conceive, then never mentioned that again. Not having a uterus is no big deal, can still use one's eggs & a surrogate...but all others would cause her to pull a Michael Jackson...did movie "Malice" about hysterectomy around the time of her surgery at UCLA Med (cathartic, perhaps?) One thing's for sure, this is one beyond weird, super freak b***h....

A440 said...

How do you explain the fact that Sunday looks like Keith?

Second: please detail exactly what went down on July 7, 2008, at Baptist Hospital. You'd think if there had NOT been an Urban-Kidman delivery, somebody would have called them out on it. If someone is lying about your hospital's involvement, it's not breaking HIPPA rules to say publicly that a delivery did not happen there.

Look, I agree completely with the fact that Kidman is a control-freak whack-a-doo. But like I've said, too many people have dug deep over these two years and come up with the same conclusion: She got knocked up via Clomid and birthed the child. This with Keith, at least initially, kicking and screaming.

smorgas91 said...

A440, with $$ which she does have, you can do anything these days to procreating a designer baby...likely his sperm and all others by someone else, like her female relative for instance, can produce a baby from a similar gene pool or close outsider with similar distinct features even (like height, fairness & other features might transfer.) All could be done hush hush (sure some hospitals have special wards for celebrities), and someone did give birth on that day at the hospital and she there for the delivery...give me a break. Her family has distinct nose/mouth areas as exemplified by her, dad, sister, her kids, that and others are totally missing from the baby. Donating sperm is easy, could be his, could be his relative, they too have distinct nose/mouth area as the baby does have...another Prince Harry of UK, tho absolutely no way near comparison,to me....

mikki said...

A440, Sunday looks like Keith to you. Not to everyone. Does she really? Or is it more that she shares his coloring, hair, eyes?

When you have money you can do most anything. Reserve an entire wing of a hospital. Bring in your own private doctors and nurses for instance. Remember, early on NK said that her own parents would be delivering the child. And where better to have a fake delivery than Nashville where there is no media intrusion - which there would deffinately have been in LA or OZ. And one last question, for someone having such a difficult time conceiving, how did she manage to time it so perfectly? Just as filming of Australia was about to finish? No word of failed attempts or miscarriages, even with her medical history (as she tells it). Its past now. We'll never know.

smorgas91 said...

Besides, A440, as I mentioned before, really, how difficult is it to prove pregnancy if you were indeed pregnant. Show the damn grotesque growth! This exhibitionist while could expose everything about her other body parts could not, once, expose her stomach while she was supposedly pregnant. Oh yea, she did a lot of OTHER things, like holding out her stomach, cupping her dress to show the curve, etc. Why was it so hard to simply show the naked tummy if everybody called it fake? Again, this lady doesn't have any inhibition about showing herself whether desired or not. Again, this is a FACT, that she could not once or repeatedly for that matter expose her stomach while all kinds of rumors called it fake. I arrest my case on that.

abc said...

kindov off current topic:

ACTING: WHAT’S IT ALL ABOUT:
BEAUTY OR CHARACTER?

Photographer Brigitte Lacombe, (in Vanity Fair January 2010), says about Meryl Streep: “I think there is a big absence of vanity. You never got the sense that she was trying to put you on her side, as some actors do. She never acted as a woman who was entitled. You know how some beautiful women just act beautiful? There is never any of that with Meryl – never.

“With others, they are hypnotised by their own image; they get completely enraptured. How many shots can you see of the same actress looking beautiful in every magazine? It’s like falling into a false sense of beauty and being worshipped for all the wrong reasons. A lot of it is huge insecurity.

“Once someone like Meryl chooses a part, she does what is good for the character. She doesn’t bring her own insecurities and fears.

“As she ages, Streep’s work derives additional power from her refusal to alter her face with cosmetic surgery or Botox. To try to stop the time, to look young – it’s such a futile, absurd way to look at life in general. And it’s very detrimental to their work. If you alter (your face) you deprive yourself of some of what you need to do your work well.”

Take note Ms Kidman! Especially in terms of “acting beautiful”.


PS: I think she did carry the child. I am not convinced the child is Keith's.

joy said...

Well, honestly the last I heard GOD was still in charge. No matter how much medication you may take or even if you seek unconventional methods to have a child it's not going to happen unless it is meant to happen.

So she didn't show her stomach, so what. Not every pregnant woman shows her stomach even if she is famous. Sunday Rose is Nicole & Keith's daughter, that's all there is to it. All of this speculation of how, why,when, where is really & truly silly.

They love that little girl & they will have a truly blessed life with her as well as Isabella & Conner (Never mind all of the issues with that situation). They are a family & the details aren't important.

They are together (hopefully for MANY MANY MANY years) and I hope they get to see Sunday Rose walk down the aisle & be happy as well. The specifics aren't important. Their love for each other & their children are what is MOST important.

I personally don't need DNA results or copies of her medical records to be satisfied. They have the right to their privacy ESPECIALLY about pregnancies & any other medical situations that they have. It's a very sensitive area for people no matter who you are. Just my little ole opinion.

smorgas91 said...

abc, sorry, I'm confused about her acting beautiful...thought it had more to do with doing crap to her face and other body parts of hers one of which is her breasts. When she was much younger, before her Oscar (God, wasn't that a joke), she thought she was the fairest one of all actresses, I think, and acted like one. Her distinct ostritch walk screamed back at you. Until recently where her old more normal looks are recaptured somehow (God, don't want to know what had and is being done before to herself; K Lagerfield called it hers is an "illusion" and recipe can't divulge but does things to herself...esp the legs, well, I don't get it here) she had spend the last decade looking like crap, obviously experimenting with whole lot of stuff to herself, including obvious self mutilations, the press labeling her "granny", "Third Lip", "granny freeze", "latex face" etc. etc. Her "acting" beautiful was hardly the issue....

abc said...

As Keith says:

He 'works' at it. All the time.

That's true & obvious!

Tara said...

Too much about that birth is weird
I do believe she is Keith's biological child and was born before July 7, 2008.

Didn't Kidman say in an interview that she was going to bake the little girl a cake for her "birthday"?
So did the resort let her do that?
Keith really should keep his mouth shut- such a bad actor!

hoosierlady said...

Joy said:


"They love that little girl & they will have a truly blessed life with her as well as Isabella & Conner (Never mind all of the issues with that situation). They are a family & the details aren't important."

Details, they aren't important for you, but you make them important for us.

Proof of these emotions, please.
Never mind the situations? But, we don't get to never mind the situations when you bring them up. Fair rules. . . .

"They have the right to their privacy ESPECIALLY about pregnancies & any other medical situations that they have."

They have a right to nothing private, as long as they put themselves out there. We pay to be entertained, hence the words "media whores".


"I personally don't need DNA results or copies of her medical records to be satisfied."

Simply put, Joy, you would indeed be satisfied, I'm sure. How much was a membership, and has NKU gone back online yet?

blue sky said...

"They love that little girl & they will have a truly blessed life with her as well as Isabella & Conner (Never mind all of the issues with that situation). They are a family & the details aren't important."

This comment really says it all. On the one hand, we are supposed to believe that Sunday, Isabella and Conner's lives are "truly blessed," but yet we are all supposed to ignore that little fact that Nicole doesn't have much to do with her older kids. Sorry, but seeing your kids a couple times a year (if that), doesn't constitute a family in my book. So blinded are the fansies that they cannot admit Nicole might not be a fit mother. If she can toss Isabella and Conner aside, what stops her from doing it with Sunday?

As far as Nicole being pregnant or not, there are too many situations during that time that are coincidental. Conception taking place while the couple sees each other for a couple of days every couple of weeks, her medical history and age, paps beating, attorney attending OB/GYN appointments, leaving the hospital in the middle of the night, which that is a HUGE factor for me. How many of you felt like packing up and moving out during the middle of the night after delivering your baby? I bet ya'll pretty much wanted to just sleep while you could. Even if they were photographed leaving the hospital, you have a newborn baby, and that is the perfect opportunity to have the baby completely covered and nothing seen by anyone. They were in the hospital having a baby. Did they leave the hospital wearing all black too? Why all the secrecy then when we had to hear about her being up all night with a bladder infection due to the pregnancy, and she had to sit with her legs spread apart because her belly was so large?

Laura said...

"Now, did she get pregnant out of some great love for family and children? Not a freakin' chance. She did it (via Clomid) to burnish her public image as the Perfect Woman who can do anything...actor, business woman, fashion plate, fertile mom at 41. She did it, in part, to thumb her nose at the Gay Midget Dwarf Who Divorced Her."

Really? Oh my God, I had no idea you could read her mind!

Jeez, you guys think you know everything.

I'd be open to considering the ideas you people have on this couple, if they weren't so ridiculous! Yes, the marriage is weird to me too, but I still have yet to hear/see any evidence (that's legit and/or MAKES SENSE!!) that they're everything you guys claim they are.

They fight? Yeah, EVERY married couple does! He praises her a little too much? Maybe, but that's his wife, there's nothing wrong with him expressing his love for her. Now, I do agree she doesn't really express the same love back, but that doesn't mean she doesn't love him. I'd hope she does. But who knows? Not me, not you. You don't know someone's life unless you've been in their shoes.

smorgas91 said...

Blue Sky: "Why all the secrecy then when we had to hear about her being up all night with a bladder infection due to the pregnancy, and she had to sit with her legs spread apart because her belly was so large?" Ew, don't remember those details, there wasn't much coverage about those in the States, I don't think.... Um, typically those are considered too much information, doubt we hear about those from any high profile pregnancies...okay, so her or her team do have a pattern of bs...called reverse psychology. For example, she's seen working out throughout pregnancy to until the night before the delivery,so they say, then the need to be seen working out stops all together after pregnancy. Isn't this a** backwords? Aren't most moms worry about getting the pregnant fat off after the deliveries? She's sure is just full of these kinds of things... There's always this need to justify with this mutton...and quite frequently a** backwords, something's "always" not right with her...seems to me.

mikki said...

Laura, NK has the choice of keeping her private life private. She choses not to. So she invites the questions and speculation based on her own actions.

Sorry we don't take everything they say as the gospel truth as you fans do. And where is your evidence that its all true? To me, believing this whole fairytale is just as ridiculous.

Smorgas91 - excellent point. Wouldn't you think that someone who was considered a high risk pregnancy would take it easy rather than obsessively workout?

Laura said...

I never ONCE said that I KNOW this or that is true. If you read what I wrote, I said that I'd HOPE she loves him, and that nothing is wrong with him expressing his love for her. Whether he means it or doesn't, WHO KNOWS? NOT US. Like I said before.

abc said...

DITCH THE ATTITUDE, LAURA!!

Reread the title of this blog!!!

If you don't like what it's about, LEAVE!! Stop making it about the commenters.

and, for your information, not "EVERY" married couple fights ... maybe in your world ... MANY MANY MANY people get along nicely and agreeably ... but then, you do tend to generalise anyway so your opinion on marriage would no doubt fall out of the same mould.

Laura said...

I'm not tryin to sound like I have an attitude, I'm just tryin to make a point like you all are. I simply said NONE OF US know their life. Its THEIR life, not ours. Don't tell me to "lose the attitude" how bout YOU lose the attitude. I can say whatever I want. I'm not trash talking anyone or calling people names so CHILL OUT.

abc said...

For Laura:

Then stop generalising, (“you guys” “you people”), and telling us “Jeez” our “ideas are so ridiculous” that (we) think (we) “know everything”.

By all means challenge the ideas with your own thoughts & opinions, but keep US “guys” out of it. This blog is about KLUNK, not the commenters.

If we bother you so much, then there is the perfect blog for you: SkewerMistress, being “Reality Check”’s blog called SkewerTheSkeptics.
She raids this blog (UM) 24/7 and copies and pastes and dissects most comments from here and replies (to herself!) with what she calls the ABSOLUTE TRUTH! She is beside herself with fury & indignation that “everyone” has been “lying” and “hating” on KLUNK “for five years now” without end. She just can’t understand why and is convinced that ALL of the “skeptics” are lonely loser middle-aged obese ugly women in love with Keith and distraught that he married Kidman. She has ALL the information you could possibly want about KLUNK which probably means she is fed it by KLUNK themselves or their PR People; or she spends every waking hour on her subjects; (using many different names) trawling & trolling & lurking every corner of the virtual world. She also has a thing about E!Online, but seems to reserve a lot of her venom & ire for “the enemy” (as she calls) Maclen, Hoosierlady and myself!! (check out the blog archives). She loves trying to figure out who everyone is.

She is very lonely over in her cesspool; has virtually no visitors and seemingly does all of her own commentary, proudly affirming herself, laughing hysterically by herself, so she would probably welcome you and your attitude with open arms to her blog where you are free to decimate all of us as much as you please and whoever else on the internet that bothers you about what they think about KLUNK.

hoosierlady said...

I made someone else's rants? I'm touched.

She thinks I'm lonely? (Frankly, I could use a week ALONE, loser, (damn it, this recession isn't my fault), middle aged, (closer, closer), obese,(I can work on that, Peanut M and M's, anyone? Dark chocolate. . . ) but UGLY?
That's ridiculous, she needs to clean her screen.
The enemy? Are you serious? The enemy? We aren't even political! This person might be taking some things a bit too personally.

I do not love Keith. I'm sorry, everyone, but I can't pretend any longer.

It's Nicole that I pine for.

blue sky said...

The conversation of blogs reminds me to ask, does anyone know what happened to Choice's site? I read it every now and then, and it appears to be down.

abc said...

Hoosierlady, you do make me laugh and this blog wouldn't be the same without you! I think Skewer Mistress specifically refers to Maclen, "inept team of one" as THE "enemy", though she does single (sic) out the 3 of us as the main "stooges" ... hey, fame at last!!
Actually, the irony is that a friend of mine in Australia always refers to my looks as "Kidmanesque" ...(though a decade and a half-ish older, but always guessed younger than NK, female obviously, also champagne blonde, slim and tall! and in the creative field) .. haha, so I am invested in thinking she is somewhat attractive!!! ;) Actually, I have never denied that, as my main gripe has been how she is spoiling her looks!!

Wonder if she is saying "No No NO" to her fellow countryman Mel!

And I further wonder if her trip to the Bahamas had anything to do with Cruz getting married there ... not as an invitee (apparently 'family only') but as her usual 'me too'? Not sure of the dates though.

rememberwhen said...

Sunday is no more Keith and Nicole's biological child than she is mine. Keith can't have children. If he could there would be tons of little Urban's running around out there. Remember what Amanda said. He never use protection. Also if she could have children why in the world didn't she have one with Tom. That child would have been golden. We all know Tom can have kids. So it had to have been her that couldn't have them. She had to fake this child for three reasons. One so people wouldn't think it was her that couldn't have a child and she needed an excuse for getting dumb for the Reader then to use Sunday for Australia's pr tour. It will all come out one day, when Sunday is old enough. This really reminds me of "Mommy Dearest." This will be "Mommy Dearest part II"

maclen said...

Yeah...at this point I am just as uninterested in the fansie defending sycophants as I am in the meaningless fansie NKUseless...or for that failure kidman! As to that blogsite, abc...let's see...3 comments in the latest blog entry...1 comment on the previous...a whopping 0 comments on the previous...wow... that joint sure is jumping! What a waste of my time to even check it out! Hell, I figure I get more eyes on my rants here at Urban Myths. So people stick with the original...the copycats are so lame!

smorgas91 said...

on rememberwhen's blog...I think as long as a man could produce sperms, whether low in count or not, they can be stored and fertilized in-vitro with a donated egg (yeah, zygote), which could then be planted (don't know when or specifics) into a surrogate. Kidman likely does not have eggs (keep thinking about that hysterectomy movie) and cruise or keith while biologically far shot from impregnanting a female for whatever reasons, their sperms could be used with an egg from someone to produce babies...I suspect suri was procreated that way with holmes' egg in vitro first. One thing for sure during these past two years, KU has never uttered or shown out of his volition his personal pride and joy with Sunday. He still does mention her in passing but always includes his wife in the same context(e.g. she has legs of his wife, not her mother.) He had finally mentioned recently about realizatio of being a dad...thought this occurred immediately or the days following the birth of one...well he's never uttered nor shown much affection for sunday.

A440 said...

rememberwhen, Amanda did shoot off her mouth in that Daily Mail interview. But she also said later that a lot of the statements had been made up by the Mail, and she disowned much of it.

smorgas, I'm gonna respectfully disagree with you on Keith and Sunday. When asked, he does the dutiful daddy bit about how she's beautiful and marvelous and terrific, etc. Says he sits with her pretty much daily to play piano with her, takes his girls out for meals together, blah, blah, blah. So he's pretty much covered his tracks. All three went to Mass and lunch a few days ago, so he's got the daddy-thing down pat.

And you gotta admit, when Queenie is out of the picture, he can be found carrying her in his arms.

In my opinion, he's doing okay for a guy who was always lukewarm to the idea of children.

rememberwhen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
mikki said...

And I must respectfully take issue with you A440. Keith comments about Sunday in general terms. He doesn't say that SHE is beautiful, marvelous, and terrific. He says being a father is.

And have to ask, where did you hear that they went to Mass & lunch? As that has not appeared anywhere in the media. It could however be tweets being reported by some of her crazy fans who claim to see the Urban's all over Nashville. They see Bella & Connor there all the time too. Even when Bella is pictured in the media somewhere else.

And don't be fooled. Sunday is NK's PR tool. It is rare that Keith is allowed a daddy & me moment for the cameras. Thats just my opinion of course.

hoosierlady said...

I can't believe you are having a conversation about someone's sperm count.

Infertility can be caused by any number of reasons, (yes, the m.d. hat is back on). A person can EVEN be infertile with one partner and not with another. (go to www.webmd.com and look up cervical mucas), you can have eggs and not release them, you could have eggs and only release them spasmodically, you can have funky lining, no lining, plaid lining, you can have them in box, on a train, in a plane, you get my drift? The reasons are as varied as the people.
Once again, NO ONE KNOWS.
NK came, she saw, she procreated. She was able to take her place with the rest of her peers in the baby bump watch hall of fame.
Besides, who cares? The PR machine rolls along, another spoke in the wheel is Sunry, tie it up, seal it with a kiss, call it a day, pull the plug, it's done.
I was working yesterday, and I ran across a picture of Nicholas Cage and his hair. I'm thinking these two are a match made in heaven. This is going to be a premeire worth watching. I am also all a flutter about the chance to see my favorite movie star on HBO, how about that! Life is grand! Her career is just flying like a phoenix! Can't hold that one back, can you? Just so proud of our girl, my heart swells. The only thing I wish is that she would share more of herself with us, especially those deep, meaningful inner thoughts. Wasn't she supposed to write a diary? Shouldn't it be out by now?

smorgas91 said...

rememberwhen...that's a very private data about KU you deliver very convincingly (and not knowing for sure one way or the other, I'll take your word for it)...but please, allow me to ask. Why would info like that be made public...where did you get your info? Perhaps there's something else you're not telling us...like are you one of his insiders (not that it would be confirmed even if you were......) Guess that pair will never have a biological offspiring....

Jennifer Scavone said...

love the new blog design

rememberwhen said...

I have deleted my post. I didn't mean to upset anyone. Sorry. Forget I ever said anything.

A440 said...

Here you go, mikki:

Keith Urban and Nicole Kidman brought two-year-old daughter, Sunday Rose, to one of Nashville's largest Catholic churches, the Cathedral of the Incarnation, for 11 a.m. mass.

Sunday Rose wore her Sunday best, a white dress, while her movie star mom, hair up, wore a butter-colored dress, slit to the knee, with strappy flats. (Believe it or not, I got that description from a large dude parishioner, not a woman. But I didn’t make fun of him. Did I mention he was large?)

Keith had on jeans and a button-down shirt.

Later, the merry trio was spotted having lunch at upscale meat-and-three The Copper Kettle, in the trendy Green Hills area of Nashville.


http://nashvillelive.visitmusiccity.com/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=micro-blog&utm_campaign=noise

Choice said...

Hoosier - Indeed, Cage's hair and Nicole's hair will compete for screen time in this new action movie. In fact, can't wait to see Nicole running around trying to ensure her wig doesn't fall off.

Blue Sky - been on holidays, problem with Google, all fixed now. (Nicole Kidman's Journey).

Nicholas Cage post for Hoosier from some weeks ago. Cage and Nikkers must surely attend the same salon:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2010/06/birds-of-feather.html

hoosierlady said...

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/07/american-idol-kris-allen-has-a-big-fan-in-keith-urban.html

I am assuming it was the reporter that is confused regarding the age of the kid.

A440 said...

You're welcome, mikki.

And as much as I'd like to be skeptical of the description, it may be legit. Yes, I've heard guys describe women's outfits in detail, and it never fails to blow me away when that happens.

A440 said...

O, happy-happy, joy-joy:

nicolekidmanofficial.com

a new site about her Unifem "activities."

Urban Myths said...

Welcome back, Choice!

smorgas91 said...

hoosierlady...just curious. What would have been the point about the potential age difference of sundry. I mean, with her recent birthday and all photos showing her pegged as 2 years-old, she obviously doesn't look 1...yeah, only literal translations work with me today so just asking

hoosierlady said...

I don't think there is a point. The kid's two. The kid isn't one, the kid is two. That is the point, the kid is two.

Is that what you wanted to know?

smorgas91 said...

Yeah great article...it provided what he was up to now & the follow-up to that Defy stinker. The age of his kid was an error in passing...wonders what a few more hours of sleep can do for mental alertness, I think..zzzzz...retraction...

footballfree said...

oh my good

maclen said...

So...another sign on how the orb is desperate to try and salvage his sinking career? Record a song with....The Wiggles?!

http://www.dailynews.com/lalife/ci_15539550

Keith Urban lends hand to benefit school music programs

"Right now, Urban is in the studio cutting his next album of songs between gigs here and there, including an upcoming recording of the old Roger Miller song "England Swings" with the Wiggles. "Having a 2-year-old, I'm not going to turn down the Wiggles," he says of the musical group beloved by children worldwide and his music-loving daughter."

Sure, orb...your recording with the wiggles because little sunry just "WUVS" them...NOT because the wiggles are one of the top grossing aussie celebs year in and out! I Also get a laugh how the formerly "terribly PRIVATE" orb on his personal life seems to no longer have a problem shilling little sunry for his professional career..."AH look...sunry is choosing instruments for the orb to play so she can dance...how ADORABLE!" Apparently, the dwindling career throws all past intentions out the window...how long till orb begins to parade little sunry on stage?

Tara said...

I can't see him bringing the kid out on stage at all. First she is Kidman's prop and not his. Secondly, whenever she is brought out all those
questions about her birth, parentage, real age come up.

Nice picture of Suri and Bella from over the weekend.

mikki said...

maclen, did you see that NK has launched her own website (for UNIFEM of course).
NicoleKidmanOfficial.com
Even has a facebook link.

Tara, your right, Sunday will never be allowed to upstage her mother.

maclen said...

Well, considering that the orb has shown a "live video feed" of his kid...supposedly "backstage" of a gig...I dont think orb actually shilling his kid in front of the audience is at some point out of the question. If you have noticed...orb is, more and more, using the "pr baby" for his own publicity. As to the website, mikki, kidman has been a "limo ammbassador" for the UN for the past 4 years...and ONLY NOW has a website up and now has a Facebook page? As I just mentioned regarding the orb...desperation calls for drastic measures. And if you'll notice about the unifem website, if you look through the different sections..."HOME" "UPDATES" "ABOUT NICOLE" AND "ABOUT UNIFEM"...very typically...the "ABOUT NICOLE" section is the longest, with the most info...about kidman! Tells you all you need to know about what the purpose of the website is...and that is to simply shill for kidman!

mikki said...

maclen, its getting close to the end of July which is when NK said she would be making a trip to Haiti. See anything about that on her website?

maclen said...

mikki said...
"maclen, its getting close to the end of July which is when NK said she would be making a trip to Haiti. See anything about that on her website?"

Your right, mikki, nothing about it on her PR website...or at unifem.org for that matter...if she said that, there is no indication of a trip.