Thursday, July 31, 2008

The name of this blog is URBAN Myths...

After one of our recent posts a comment was made about how we don't seem to hold Keith at fault for any of the stuff we have had to deal with in the last three years. Well, we do. Keith Urban is as responsible as Nicole Kidman, probably more so because he has gone along with her manipulation the entire time. What it comes down to is this,..Keith has been using the fine art of manipulation since day one to further his career. When he met Nicole Kidman he got a graduate school education in manipulation.

He did what he had to “get famous”. You noticed I used that phrase and not a phrase like “build a career”? Because you don't build a career by posing in Playgirl, and giving interviews that stress his recovery and his spirituality. He used all of those and more, like dating up. Yes, the man had supermodel and Oscar winning actress girlfriends but he was also sleeping around. He would give an interview where he said he was lonely, yet he was living with someone and having a quiet home life. Keith was selling whatever it took to get famous - including media deception.

Most of his fan base didn't know a lot about this man. In some ways it was better when we didn't know much about the last ten years. I didn't want to know he could be bought like a good leather coat. But he was when Kidman sunk her claws in him. I really believe that he went to rehab, not just because he needed to, but because it was best at the time to put him somewhere so that Kidman could get some positive press instead of dealing with a slew of stories about his private life that threatened her “happy in love” image. The two sides of Keith Urban, the brilliant musician and the morally challenged human being, are often conflicting with that need, that addiction to fame. I actually think the real Keith Urban is probably a better person than Keith Kidman is. I am tired of the persona of a public screw up and a weak man who was saved by Kidman's love. I think Keith has always known what he has wanted and has done exactly what he has had to get it. There is nothing weak about that, just something very sad.

As a postscript to this blog, the Sydney Morning Herald published a blurb today that Kidman and the baby will be flying back to Sydney this weekend to start her re-shoots - without Keith. We'll see if he follows along behind them after his show on Saturday. Stay tuned...

56 comments:

maclen said...

Certainly the remaining devoted to the orb will be thankful for whatever crumbs he can throw out there with the smallest amount of effort on his part...whether its hitching onto underwoods and chesney's tours, recycling years old songs for singles... or dueting on other country stars albums... it surely will make him the perfect "second fiddle"... a role that he has become accustomed to catering and adjusting himself to kidman's career. I certainly have a lesser opinion of the orb for being so readily amenable to mediocrity... his own and of course to kidman's career.

rememberwhen said...

Did they say Keith would follow after the show? So Keith has to fly commercial again. Lets see if Nicole is caring a baby on or off her private jet. Jamie get ready!!!!!!

Casse Role said...

And we will see if the paps can get any photos. Maybe the Nanny holding the baby so close that you can only tell it IS a baby? Or Maybe Mommy with a carrier and a blanket over top of her?

notachance said...

Ahh, back to she's damned if she does, damned if she doesn't.

Let's count 'em up:

1) She takes kid to OZ without him, UM blasts her - check

2) She goes to OZ with Keith or kid, UM blasts her - check

3) She stays in Nashville & Keith takes kid with him to show, UM blasts her - check

4) She goes to store and leaves kid at home, UM blasts her - check

5) I could fill a book with this shit. NK can never win on here. The fact of the matter is she is returning to work so someone has to be responsible for the care of the baby and NK with the private jet is the better mode of transportation, dontchyathink? I'm betting Keith will follow, and not because he's being a puppy dog, but because that's the plan and remember, his family does live there too.

Casse Role said...

notachance said...

NK can never win on here.

CHECK.

As I have said before, some of us DO NOT HATE HER. We just don't like some of things she has done.

Do you like the President? Or any of the ones in the running? Do you have an opinion of them? Can one do better then the other? Are you voting for one?
Do you like a certain Movie? What about it do you like? What movie do you dislike and why?...

We have opinions about movies, presidents, and celebrities. These are our choices. What is the big deal with trying to change our minds? You admire her, we don't.
It's not like any of us are on TV shouting from the roofs about her.
This is a blog, some people read it, some don't. If you don't like what is being said, then go to a better blog. Rather then have the same old debate, don't you think it's better to just let things go?
I don't care either way if any NK fans stay or go, but if it's going to eat at you that she isn't getting any love from any of us then why torture yourselves?

On a happier note, I really do wish her and Keith well with their daughter. I hope she brings lots of sunshine into their lives.

doublewide said...

of course NK can't win on this site.....

i agree maclen......doesn't say much for the orb, being bought like a leather coat

good blog

keith will probably follow after the show on saturday. wonder when his mum and dad will get to see the baby.

i don't care if somebody has to work....NK STILL doesn't care one twit about being a mother. it was all about being PREGNANT....

Lisa said...

Even Bob and Marienne are supporting it at this point. I havent seen proof they are being held against their Will. In fact, according to Bob as long as he's moving up, there's no shame in considering it an advantage over other women.

I believe UM. And for a site with the word "Myths" in it, it sure ends up right on the mark everytime.

woriedmonkey said...

Hummm.. last I heard, it was not considered appropriate or especially healthy to subject a newborn infant ( 3 weeks and counting) to long haul air travel.... except in emergencies or when there was no other option.....

of course, Keith will follow.... back to his insane commuting I'm guessing til the tour is totally finito.

However, she must have known about the re-shoots for ages. Remember those cryptic comments about baptising the baby in Oz or keith's parents getting a look by the end of the month.

Just love how Nicole is hunkering downhome in her
Nashville garden bonding with the baby she has longed for and yearned for for so long.. the one that she never thought she would have in this lifetime.

Last thought: there is a word for people who will do or say anything to get what they want:

pathological

maclen said...

doublewide said...
"of course NK can't win on this site.....
...i agree maclen......doesn't say much for the orb, being bought like a leather coat"

Well, doublewide, considering the purpose of this site being formed was a response to the orb getting involved with kidman...and the very first entry on this blog was..."American Fans Want Urban to Dump Kidman"...you would think that it wouldnt nessesarily take a genius to figure out the slant of this blog! And the slant was and still is that kidman would be bad for the orbs career...and it has been, and 4 months after getting married the orb ended up in rehab... which proved it was bad for the orb on a personal level as well, despite whatever cover stories inept team kidman tried to hand feed the public... or what the fansies may try to claim optherwise here on Urban Myths. As with kidman's failure in her first marriage, or with her history of reshoots of her disastrous films, and her failed history as a would be adoptive mother to cruise's kid... it is history that foretells that her next movie, her next marriage and her next try at motherhood will most certainly fail... because as has been explained and highlighed over and over here on this blog... kidman does not learn from her past mistakes...she simply keeps repeating them... and that makes her a failed student of history.

Imahick said...

NK won't do what we would think was the right thing to do, because she doesn't give a crap about anyone but herself. Right now, the only thing that would satisfy me would be to see her hunker down in Nashville for a year and take care of that baby. Be a mother. Her constant whining about yearning for a child...blah blah blah...was just for show. She never intended to slow down and be a hands on mother, inspite of what she said.

She says what she thinks will portray the "correct image." It's all illusion to NK and most people swallow it hook, line & sinker.

I don't for a minute believe she is taking care of this child...nor will she. There's several Nannies charged with the care of Sunday Rose, no doubt.

If she cared about her baby and her husband, she'd let him take a year to concentrate on HIS career while being a mother to this baby.

But then, she has never shown an ounce of care for Keith, his career, or this child. It's been all about NK...which of course, we all predicted.

That must really burn NK's fans' butts!

banbotox said...

maclen said: kidman does not learn from her past mistakes...she simply keeps repeating them...

I do believe that is the definition of insanity..repeating the same mistakes over and over expecting a different outcome.

Poor, poor Sunday.

realitycheck said...

Bravo, notachance. Great post, i wouldn't add anything else to it.

casserole said "As I have said before, some of us DO NOT HATE HER. We just don't like some of things she has done."

Give me a break. The skepti-haters dont like anything she does, ever. And thats how this blog sustains itself. Since Nicole is always wrong, you all can always complain. Even when theres nothing new to discuss.

doublewide said...

since learning IMO she pretty much has ulterior motives for everything she does, then well, what are we supposed to think?

when they first hooked up, i didn't like it because i don't really like hollywood marrying country music.....sometimes it works out like brad p. BUT i had no idea who the real nicole was til she was shoved in my face continually by mr. diva pants, keith. LOOKY WHO I MARRIED, AREN'T I THE GREATEST? geez

then the rehab, and neglect of the career, and the PICTURES! nothing adds up about this couple being in love. NOTHING

IMO, it's as fake as fake can be. just like NK

if you want acceptance of NK, then move along, cause it ain't happening here.

Lisa said...

I'm starting to beleive this baby has a defect she doesnt want anyone to see. I've always worried they would have a down syndrome child. Before the flame guns come out, I've got a DS neice and we love every cell in her body and every breath she takes. It's just something that I know women in their 40's want to avoid.

Plus the way NK has been looking in her photos. She appears to have had her entire world shaken up. They look so afraid of something!!

stillhopefull said...

I belive this is nothing more that "where is Suri?" She seems to emulate everything that Tommy boy does. Where is Sunday Rose???? Her mom is every where other than with her, what could it be? Well folks...nothing more than good ole Nic being the same kind of parent she was to her other 2 children. And who of us thinks this is a big surprise?? Certainly not I. Most of the time, mothers are what ever kind of mother they are going to be..at 20, 30 or 40. Makes no difference. You either have it or you don't. Some of us however have no choice but to have 'IT' becuase we have no one else to step in!

maclen said...

Yeah stillhopefull, I'll bet once kidman is back in Aussieland, where her arranged photo ops are basically written into Australian law, there will not be a single hint of a rumor or sign that kidman in fact has a newborn kid... you'll get the same tired shots of kidman out eating, which seems to be her favorite right now...with "friends"... caught on set perhaps... working out in her black, deathly over done grim reaper workout suit... but again, no hint of her kid... she's saving that for around the time her film comes out... so it's UN visit and unveil kid in a magazine layout all layed out to coincide with her movie's release... and of course, it wont help the movie...from what I've seen, coming up on a month since she gave birth, no one, not even in the media are even asking where her kid is... they're talking about brangelina's twins upcoming magazine appearence, a Pr ploy kidman could not capitalize on because she is not as important as she thought she was.

cricket said...

I doubt the baby has down's syndrome since Kidman didn't give birth to her herself.And she wouldn't have bought a defective baby.If the surrogate would have had a child with some problem she would have simply refused to take delivery and just found herself a healthy baaabeey to buy.

notachance said...

Wow - actually thinking the baby could be DS? Just because there hasn't been a photo yet? Now who's the sick one?

I say thank goodness there hasn't been a photo, and I can't wait for less & less photo's of celebs and the celebutants and we get back to some more important things to take pictures of in this country.

I applaud OZ for blazing the trail in new laws againts the paps - here's to hoping that LA and then whole states follow suit. The paps are out of control. Maybe once the American public isn't force-fed a diet of celeb pic's they will realize they didn't need them to begin with and find something more beneficial to do with that time that will actually make them feel better about themselves - like take a walk.

inittowinit said...

notachance said...
The fact of the matter is she is returning to work so someone has to be responsible for the care of the baby...
-----------------------------------
Yes, NAC, that's the "fact of the matter" - she's returning to work a mere few weeks after having a baby; a baby whom she says she has "always wanted". She's returning to a career which I've heard her say with my own ears that she'd love to walk away from for a family. She's taking a little tiny bany presumably to a movie set to be cared for by others while she works.

I'm not knocking working parents. I've been blessed to be home with my children for many years. I left a very professional career to do so because they were more important. I know many women can't afford that. But I think most would CHOSE to if they could. I also know there are some who prefer to work and couldn't stand the stresses of raising children solely, nor can they walk away from a career they love. But she's a LIAR. She has openly said she wanted to walk away and yet not only does she reshoot so soon, but she has other films in line. She's in a position financially to certainly remain home if she so desperately wanted this baby (and really wanted to be her sole caregiver). If she can't stand the stresses of doing that full-time, then hire a part-time nanny. Have the best of both worlds. Be a SAHM, yet have the luxury of running errands while the baby naps or plays at home. Go out to lunch with "friends/employees", run to Starbucks. I doubt anyone would begrudge her of those things. It's normal to want to "get away" and w/ a part-time nanny, she could do that more often than most of us. But don't tell the world you want to "walk away" from your career, and then go running back within weeks of being given the very thing you claim you've wanted more than anything else in this world.

Yes, NAC, you brought up a great "fact"....

getaholdofurself said...

inittowinit said...
"If she can't stand the stresses of doing that full-time, then hire a part-time nanny. Have the best of both worlds. Be a SAHM, yet have the luxury of running errands while the baby naps or plays at home. Go out to lunch with "friends/employees", run to Starbucks. I doubt anyone would begrudge her of those things. It's normal to want to "get away" and w/ a part-time nanny, she could do that more often than most of us."

nk can do nothing right according to the skeptics. i'm fairly certain they'd begrudge her that.

notachance said...

Since we don't really know the inner workings of the KUNK family - let me just throw this one out there:

Keith says to her: No way should you stop working just because we got married, just because you had a baby, just because... This could be Keith's call. He may want it this way.

And btw - people fly with 1 month old babies all the time, on commercial flights no less. Sunday gets to go on a private jet, no chance of "common" germs getting to her.

rememberwhen said...

Show me the birth certificate for Sunday Rose Kidman Urban. How soon do they have to have one registered? I don't think there is a Sunday Rose Kidman Urban yet. She hasn't been born yet.

maclen said...

rememberwhen said...
"Show me the birth certificate for Sunday Rose Kidman Urban. How soon do they have to have one registered? I don't think there is a Sunday Rose Kidman Urban yet. She hasn't been born yet."

Funny comment rememberwhen... by all the accounts, and for lack of any indication ...could actually be plausible!...So perusing the gossip news sites this morning as kidman is rumored to be jetting off to Oz and reshoot her already failed film... all the talk seems to be about Sunday... not kidmans forgotten kid...by the media and kidman herself...but this upcoming Sunday...seems the nets are all abuzz because that is when people.com is reportedly going to unveil a first pic of brangelina's twins. I can just imagine kidmans angst over it..."That should have been me!" Jolie's kids are being fawned over, and by partner People mag to boot..but kidman is once again having to drag her sorry career back to pointless and useless reshoots for another movie mess...

inittowinit said...

notachance said...

Keith says to her: No way should you stop working just because we got married, just because you had a baby, just because... This could be Keith's call. He may want it this way.
-----------------------------------

Well now, that would make her submissive. She doesn't have a submissive bone in her body! She does whatever the Hell SHE wants to do and she controls and manipulates every situation. So now, I say again, since SHE said she would walk away from it all, and hasn't, that makes her a LIAR.

Besides all of that, Keith was raised in a loving home with a mum who was around. I can't imagine him wanting Nicole to go off and maintain her career, let alone forcing her. Since she said she would leave, IF this is his idea, the only ground you have with this scenario is that he is forcing her to keep up the career. Come on, even those of you who worship her, do you REALLY think Nicole Kidman can be forced to do a thing she doesn't want to do?

inittowinit said...

ETA, given your hypothetical scenario, either he's forcing her or she's lying. My bet is on her as a Liar because we all know she's done it before, and many time. I think I have pretty good odds.

notachance said...

I'm not saying he's forcing her, I'm saying that he may have said it's not an issue and she can make the decision for herself. If she wants to work she can.

Just because, in the past, she has said that she would give it all up - yeah, yeah, yeah - I know I've uttered words about giving up things if this, if that, but when you get right down to it, when you are doing something you love, do you really give it up?

maclen said...

...STOP THE PRESSES!!!...

I just saw the beginnings of an upswirl... an oncoming tsunami that a frenzy is building for the pic of kidmans kid... right here...

http://www.smh.com.au/news/people/kidman-in-line-of-fire/2008/08/01/1217097535823.html

...oh, wait a minute... it's from kidmans official aussie mouthpiece, Sydney Morning Herald, trying to build phoney buzz from another lame news plant... quote: "Sydney's paparazzi are salivating over the prospect of landing this year's biggest money shot?"..."Sales of an exclusive baby shot could generate more than $100,000"?...poor Ozzy D-listers... cant play in the big leagues... play in your own bush(men) league,by golly! You can do it!!.... I pity poor inept team kidman...

inittowinit said...

notachance said...
I'm not saying he's forcing her, I'm saying that he may have said it's not an issue and she can make the decision for herself. If she wants to work she can.
----------------------------------
Well certainly, I can't see Keith MAKING her stay home either - of course he would let her chose, but her choice is telling...
----------------------------------- Just because, in the past, she has said that she would give it all up - yeah, yeah, yeah - I know I've uttered words about giving up things if this, if that, but when you get right down to it, when you are doing something you love, do you really give it up?
-----------------------------------
If you're asking me if I'd give up caffeine for a healthier lifestyle, no, but I did when I was pregnant. If you're asking me if I'd give up a career, or ANYTHING that I could truly "afford" to do or give up, for my children, then ABSOLUTELY. I'd give up my life for them. Nicole, on the other hand, IMO, would only do that so she could yet aqain play "victim".

Face it. She's still a LIAR.

notachance said...

Not that I'm an NK lover, but we all only see what is on the surface of things, don't we? None of us know the real truth of any of this.

Imahick said...

None of us know the truth. But right now, it appears that NK is heading over to Oz to re-shoot scenes from Australia, and Sunday Rose is not even 4 wk old.

If that ends up being inaccurate and NK stays in Nashville, being a Mother to the baby, for the next five months, I will apologize for criticizing her for being self absorbed and selfish.

I don't think I will have to apologize though.

As far as giving up things you love for your kids...that's what parenting is all about. Women give up many things that they enjoy during pregnancy...because it's in the best interest of the developing fetus. Any mother worth her salt will make concessions and sacrifices for her children ... but I think you need maternal instinct to make those sacrifices and my opinion is that NK has none.

She is self absorbed. It's all about her. She has a highly developed sense of entitlement. So...I don't think she will give up anything for this baby. She will allow others to raise her child while she continues to indulge herself by pursuing HER career and the activities SHE enjoys.

But I'll admit it if I'm proven wrong and she stops working for six months to a year to bond with Sunday Rose.

Casse Role said...

Imahick said...
But I'll admit it if I'm proven wrong and she stops working for six months to a year to bond with Sunday Rose.

I would like to be proven wrong, for Keith and the babys sake. But
her actions in the past just make it hard to think she will change.
Only time will tell.

rememberwhen said...

imahick I don't think you will have to apologize either.

stillhopefull said...

I also say 'right on IMAH'! She will never think more of any one other than herself! That is what her life is about - HER. I may be able to forgive the Austraila re-shoots - as I'm sure this is not really what she wants to be doing. It only shows that someone is trying to make this movie better than it is. Must be a big blow to her ego...so I could give her that she needs to finish something she started over a year ago. But with the other engements that follow this...that just proves she is still trying to prove herself 'Hollywood Worthy' rather than sticking to the right thing and work on trying to prove herself as Mommy Worthy. Which would be in the best interest of Sunday Rose.

CJ said...

Ok, call me crazy since SR is probably already on a plane to Oz but if 1. Nannies are going to be caring for SR anyway and 2 we know paps are going to be worse in OZ why not just leave Sunny with her dad in TN? KU said he'd like to have mom and baby out on tour with him - here's his chance with the baby. It would probably be easier to keep her hidden for her Nov reveal in TN rather than Oz. I would hope, with concerts every Sat, that Keith will not be flying back and forth to Oz. I would assume he would be staying in TN or LA to work on the new album. At least Keith might check in on SR every once in awhile. Yes, it would prove NK isn't breastfeeding but it would also dispel the prenup rumor that KU can't have the baby in another country from her mom.

maclen said...

Well, cj, since I dont believe this kid will be revealed till nov. at the latest, or maybe oct at the earliest, as I also commented before... that question of course would simply be answered if kidman was actually photog'ed carrying the kid enroute or on arrival...just as the photo ops of kidman meeting the orb arriving in the OZ airport after the orbs stint in rehab...because of course... "reports" the kid is in OZ or remained in tennessee certainly wouldnt prove either way. And as the Sydney Morning Herald piece I posted earlier shows, the attempt to build the "where's sunrey?" fury has already begun... kidman is going to simply show off the kid in just a normal and regular matter?. I dont believe she will.

inittowinit said...

Imahick said...
If that ends up being inaccurate and NK stays in Nashville, being a Mother to the baby, for the next five months, I will apologize for criticizing her for being self absorbed and selfish.

-----------------------------------
I will still find her self absorbed and selfish. It would be a nice start, but she puts herself first during so many other circumstanced that it would be hard to lift her of these titles if she stays with the baby. Like I said, it's a great beginning, but there need to be longterm, life-long changes.

inittowinit said...

notachance said...
Not that I'm an NK lover, but we all only see what is on the surface of things, don't we? None of us know the real truth of any of this.
-----------------------------------
No, we don't know the truth, but when she says from her own mouth that she WANTS to "walk away from it all" (referring to her career) for a family, yet signs on to make other movies (While she is pregnant, I might add), that to me is beyond just "the surface".

CJ said...

I'm WAY behind on my junk email. My quote of the day for July 7 (Sunday's birthday) was "Your children need your presence more than your presents." by Jesse Jackson How appropriate.

maclen said...

So, just a few late night musings...as is sometimes my habit.... ha... just saw a new "steamy" pic release from kidman's flop, Australia, over at movie site joblo.com. It's of jackman and kidman's characters knelling on a bed, in an embrace... jackmans right hand on kidman left posterior... well, now for sure I am 100% sure this movie is gonna fail. Because from my observation over these past few years is that kidman's cinematic sexual predisposition in her films is...how should I say?... a real turn off to film audiences. The more kidman tries to sex up the film, the worse it fails...certainly since 2001 and certainly the years before, kidman has had a almost 20 year career of not having had any memorable chemestry with any of her male costars...not Malkovich in portrait...not clooney in peacemaker... not mcgregor in rouge...not Bettany in dogville... certainly not hopkins in stain......... and...(whoever was in birthday girl with her???)... not whoeverit was in Birth...or the kid who played her husband in that thing...not jude law in cold mountain...not ferrel in bewitched..or broderick in stepford.... penn in Interpreter...downy jr in Fur...craig in invasion... oh yeah...cruise in eyes...days...and far and away...(some interesting trivia... cruise, who was the top star of the 90s, these 3 films made with kidman are his lowest grossing films in the 90s...it still applies today for kidman.) Kidman does not exude an inner romantic passion on film... does not elicit compassion or empathy from filmgoers...it is all mechanical sex and nudity...as most of her roles are dysfuncional or warped or confused.And when she tries...as in bewitched or stepford... she fails more than normal...so now she will make Australia the new gone with the wind? The next titanic? or the far more applicable Out of africa? Again, her already set in stone mold, and her past history says no.

CJ said...

Just what every mom with a newborn should be focusing their time on. So glad to see her priorities are straight.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1040984/Nicole-tip-tap-shape-Oscars.html

Nicole Kidman has already squeezed back into her skintight jeans weeks after giving birth - thanks to a demanding new movie role.

The 41-year-old actress, who is married to singer Keith Urban, is training hard for the film of the musical Nine.

'Nicole has been doing several hours of dance rehearsals each day and the weight has dropped off,' says a friend.

'Physically it's a very demanding role and the musical director, Paul Bogaev, has been living with Nicole and her family so they can train 24/7.

'The movie has an incredible cast and she knows it will do well at the Oscars - so wants to be sure she's in tip-top shape.'

Imahick said...

Ok...lets hear the supporters tell us how it's OK for her to be out of the house half the time and have a dance coach LIVE with her and do dance rehearsals with her several hours each day. It must be such a great time for NK and Keith to bond with their new baby...between tap dances and twirls. She's a real winner.

All she cares about is her career and her image. NOTHING has changed for NK. She doesn't give a crap about her husband or his career ... and sadly, she doesn't seem to the list bit interested in this new baby. To me, it's disgusting. And it is disgusting to think that some people will JUSTIFY this.

rememberwhen said...

And her supporters can't blame COS this time. Also supporters you have to know now that is was never COS that kept her away from the other children. It was her!!!!!!!

ecoaster70 said...

Those who blame her lack of relationship with her kids on COS are burying their heads in the sand. COS is a scary thing, but they aren't making her take film roles around the world that keep her away from her kids and out of the US for months on end. They aren't the ones who prevented her from even owning a home in LA for years. Look at her most recent film roles. Shortly before getting married she signed onto Golden Compass being shot in London soon after getting married. This had the potential to be a 3 picture deal. She signed onto this knowing that she would be in Australia for the better part of 2007 filming. In the middle of filming "Australia" she signs onto a movie to be shot in Germany immediately following the completion of "Australia". We all know where that role went. And then, while pregnant, she signs onto yet another role to be shot in London, all the while knowing that there would be a heavy promotional push for "Australia" that would have her traveling. Not to mention the roles since getting divorced that had her out of the country for months on end. This is all COS fault? I don't think so.

getaholdofurself said...

i don't have the faintest idea if the live in dance coach article is true or false. luckily the skeptics can confirm it for those of us who aren't in the know.

don't believe the lies said...

She's just a horrible mother plain and simple. Someone so selfish should stay single and not reproduce...not that I think she did in the first place.

She's someone who will NEVER give up a movie roll. Hell she probably thinks she should take them while their still being offered. Soon the offers will dry up. Although I can't believe they're still being offered she is box office poision. Eventually people in the industry will catch on and there will be nothing left for her except her farm, goats, spinning classes, cigarettes and then maybe she can actually pay attention to her kids...nah that will NEVER happen!!!

inittowinit said...

It doesn't bother me that she may want to work while raising children. I didn't, but many do and that in iteself doesn't bother me. I know MANY great mothers who work full-time and are wonderful at raising happy, healthy children. In fact, I think she has a PERFECT career as a working mom with a baby. She could bring along that baby and schedule in "trailer stops", even nurse the baby (hey, there's an idea...) many times during the day, and work around the baby's nap schedule. It COULD work very well and many other actresses do it successfully.

What really bothers me is that she LIES and seems to show no interest in the baby. She claims she will walk away from her career, then doesn't. Many of us skeptics have a problem with her having this "live in" coach. That doesn't bother me either. It only bothers me that she is taking on this new role so soon after giving birth, and yet during the time she was supposedly "bonding", she was out with friends, working out, Starbucks, mattress shopping, etc. Yes, these were only moments in time. But there were too many times she was out and about so soon after supposedly birthing her baby. This is a time when caring mothers would have been home, doting on their child - especially mothers who knew they were returning to work so soon!

These are the things I find most troubling and she doesn't seem to want to spend time with this baby. I don't give a damn if she wants to work. I DO care that there will be one more adult woman in this world who was raised by an uncaring mother because that does affect so many of us down the road. She lies through her teeth to tell us all what she WANTS us to believe about her, then does as she had always intended. Her intentions are very misguided, and that will ceratainly affect this poor little girl as she grows up. All I can hope for is that they have a very loving nanny employed, who will stay and offer important continuity for this unfortunate child.

don't believe the lies said...

I agree. She's also in a spot where she doesn't have to work. She can afford to take the time off. But does she? Nope. She's in a position to take all the time she wants not like most women who would kill to do so.

I had almost forgotten about her walking away from her career. Funny how her lies and manipulations keep adding up. I wish someone in the public would call her on it.

Oh btw, anyone see Brad & Angelinas babies on the cover of People? So freakin adorable. No wonder they weren't offering Nicole shit. She didn't stand a chance!

ecoaster70 said...

don't believe the lies said:
"Oh btw, anyone see Brad & Angelinas babies on the cover of People? So freakin adorable."

--------------------------

Yes! How adorable is Shilow? That is one beautiful little girl.


Did anybody happen to hear the country countdown with Lon Helton this weekend? Lon revealed that at Ronnie Dunn's 4th of July party she told him her due date was July 21st, after a little probing from Lon. All she would say at first was she was due any day. Lon is a friend of Keith's, so it's not like he would go on air the next day and say "Hey, Nicole is due the21st!" Even Lon said he was surprised to hear on Monday, that she'd delivered. Ronnie Dunn mentioned that as they were leaving, Keith had gone back into the barn and Nicole supposedly had a contraction and sat down on the driveway. Sitting down on the driveway? Who the hell would do that? Funny how Keith wasn't around when she did that. Was she setting the stage perhaps? Was she using a Braxton Hicks as a labor contraction? Then on Monday, Sunday Rose was born. I know I'm in the minority here on this, but for the record, I do think she was pregnant, but her madwoman workouts kept her weight down. Which I think was intentional on her part. She wasn't due until the 21st but her mother & sister just happened to arrive that weekend? She was at the gym and then seen buying magazines in Borders on Sunday? It was arranged to have the rooms around hers blogged off? Perez Hilton had a comment on his site that Nicole would deliver on Monday, but that comment was removed? My theory? She was induced. She knew she had to be back in Australia the first week of August to do re-shoots. Not to mention that she has "Nine" to get in shape for. No way could you take a 2 week old baby on such a long flight. I think she wanted to deliver early so she'd have more time to prep herself to go back to work. It's not a pretty theory, but after hearing this interview today & reading about the re-shoots & the "Nine" rehearsals, it's what I believe.

inittowinit said...

You're not alone, ecoaster. I too think she was pregnant. But I would be surprised if her due date was really the 27th. If so, that would mean she wasn't even three months when she made the announcement. Wasn't that made around Jan. 8th? With her history, it was very risky to announce it so early.

don't believe the lies said...

Well suppose your theory is true that would be the most selfish thing you could do. It's like saying "Uh sorry but I need to take you out ASAP so I can get back to work. I know your not done growing and getting healthy but the sooner you learn its about ME kid the better off you'll be!"

What a joke she is!

Volenut said...

"her due date was really the 27th. If so, that would mean she wasn't even three months when she made the announcement. Wasn't that made around Jan. 8th? With her history, it was very risky to announce it so early."
Are you kidding?? If something happened to the baby, wouldn't that mean MORE sympathetic PR for her??

inittowinit said...

Volenut said...
"her due date was really the 27th. If so, that would mean she wasn't even three months when she made the announcement. Wasn't that made around Jan. 8th? With her history, it was very risky to announce it so early."
Are you kidding?? If something happened to the baby, wouldn't that mean MORE sympathetic PR for her??

-----------------------------------
No, I don't believe so. She needed a BABY to prove to the world that she isn't "infertile". Tom had a baby so the fingers were pointed toward her as the reason they had adopted. But of course, there's never any real way to "prove" paternity. She carried a baby (even though many skeptics believe she didn't, most common Americans do). If she were to just come out and say she had been pregnant and then have a miscarriage, it would have appeared to be her "problem" and definitely not Tom's. So, while yes, she would rellish in playing a vitcim yet again, this time, I think that would have backfired. This baby was as much a slap to Tom as it was for her own personal PR.

stillhopefull said...

OK...here is my new wishful thinking for the week. The hubby just bought Kid Rock's new album - Rock N Roll Jesus. And might I say...a very very good album indeed. The first one I have heard in a long time that made me want to move to the music. A lot how I felt when I heard Golden Road. If Kid Rock can put together some wonderful music after the disolving of his very public marriage w/ Pam Anderson...there is hope that when Keith finally gets tired of all this craziness he is in now....some wonderful music could pour out of him as well.

notachance said...

I am in agreeance that she induced early. When word leaked of when the "conception" probably occurred, I knew the due date would fall late July. It was a mirror image of my own pregnancy, albeit many years later. I had a due date of 7/25 and didn't deliver until 7/30.

So, any news today of the flight back home?

Urban Myths said...

My, it's eerily quiet in here today. Ms. Kidman and child (?) should have been in Oz yesterday (US time). Would love to see the shots Jamie Fawcett captured, wouldn't you?

The NKU site is down... ODD, no? Camp Kidman seems to have gone dark. Can't wait to find out why!

A new blog will be up in the morning...

maclen said...

Well, Urban Myths, the weekends come and gone... and nothing about her grand return to OZ. Despite the Oz media shilling for the nonexisting clamor for the baby's pic, maybe they were just premature in their coverage. Or perhaps inept team kidman forgot to call their Aussie pap sources...or as I tend to lean, after her PR pregnancy ended up a bust, no decent bid for her pics...and she's simply painted herself in the proverbial corner... and now just wants to lay low and let this whole period pass... and she just wants to get back to what she loves the most.... which is getting back onto a movie set, where she is catered to and fussed over by makeup and wardrobe...which is truly ironic, since a woman who just gave birth to a newborn would naturally be so readily and willing to cater and fuss over a baby, but she chooses to get herself quickly back into her make believe world.