Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Spinning, Spinning, Spinning...

Are they honorable for not pimping out the baby snaps for millions of dollars? Or are they famewhores for trying to get up to THREE MILLION dollars for little Miss Kidman Urban’s mug on a magazine cover? Before she was born? It all makes for a good detective novel doesn't it? I say “they” because I think Daddy is just as much a part of this as Mommy. I think it’s time to be less giving toward Keith and a little more suspect on his ‘more than willingness to go along with all of this’? What is in it for him? More fame. That is why he is still in this mess, the fame. Don't forget that the man traded up a supermodel for an Academy Award winning "actress". He is not above painting the canvas of his own life with shades of color to have you believe one thing as opposed to another. But if given a choice I would like to believe he is sincere, wouldn't you? So that brings up this question - where is he? We haven't heard of any sightings of him since he was seen buying magazines in a Nashville mall the day before the birth. So where is he? Giving up coffee?

There are two people that Camp Kidman really, really wants you to believe are in Nashville. Bella and Connor Cruise. There was a planted sighting on a Kidman fan board and there was a plant to a Nashville newspaper columnist who isn't that reliable. If they are there, great! Visit Nicole and her new family. If they aren't then well, what can you say? The woman whores out all of her children for public consumption. Show us the baby already...

48 comments:

maclen said...

It seems after losing out to jolie for first baby pics price tag... and then opting out of the competition when jolie actually gave birth and will recieve $11 mill...or more... it looks like kidman is having to lower her expectations of media manipulation outlets. Responding to perez hilton once again to dispute this first picture negotiations... having to plant the story of cruises kids are visiting her on a fawnsite board? Now this story going around she will just release the first pic at a local newspaper because no one else wants them? Boy, seems her options and plant sources are really looking very bleak. Sure she can get the internet's hundreds...if not thousands of copy and paste sites spread her leaks and plants...but not being able to get her price on the pics from any mag... Aussie confederates included it seems...shows how far she has truly fallen. So the pregnancy and celeb newborn publicity option has been reduced to basically nil... so what does she have left for the push of PR for her next film flop? Another vanity fair cover piece of recycled relelations? More internet conference video to local stations... again, how ho hum.. kidman, it turns out is very one dimensional.

CJ said...

Why is she pretending to be insulted that we the public think she will use baby Urban for publicity? How is Sunday different from Bella and Connor? Yes, ahem, she gave birth to Sunday. She adopted both Bella and Connor as babies. Both of them were seen and photographed out and about as babies. I believe, like Suri, they were "introduced to the world" by magazine photo spread. Lie like she will NK DOES use Bella and Connor for publicity. Does anyone think NK allowing Bella to dye her hair blue when TC isn't around wouldn't make world wide headlines?!? Forced to fly to Oz for mom's wedding and the kids were "visiting sick kids at the hospital" before normal people would be out of the commercial airport with their luggage. Yes, NK uses her kids with Tom for any media publicity she can get. Now, why should we believe Urban's baby will be any different?

(Tom & Kate, I've got a donation to the charity of your choice if you will release pictures of Bella and Connor proving they are not and have not been in TN visiting Nic. Until I see picture proof they are in Nashville I won't believe it. It's summer vacation. They are probably away at camp so NK can't prove they are with her but no pictures of them with Tom will be coming out either.)

maclen said...

Yeah, inept team kidman's indignation over this is very comical... not surprised that kidman would consider jolie distasteful for selling the pics... who knows, perhaps kidman is not aware jolie, who is grabbing the money from kidman's last remaining pr outlet, magazine publications...is giving the money to charity... certainly jolie trumps kidman's pathetic attempts at that as well. For kidman is so self centered to believe her "image' is enough, and that simply appearing at a kids hospital, or at a UN press conference or simply sending in those tired online conference videos is such a huge sacrifice for her. No, it's the least she could do, but it's the choicest way to get in a photo op.

realitycheck said...

Umyths and the rest of the skepti-haters need to get a clue. There is a huge difference between having candid pics of you and your baby out and about, and making a multi-million dollar deal with a tabloid that you child will know about later in life. How will they feel knowing there was a price on their head, even if it was for charity? What if the parents got less or more than another celebrity baby? Either way it could negatively impact a child. Its still distasteful, even giving the money away because the price is so disgustingly high. The charity isnt important anymore...its the PR for the parents and whatever magazine getting the "big get". What Nicole and Keith are doing is the right thing. Other celebs like Halle Berry shunned magazine covers as well.

So for those of you that think Nicole uses her children with TC, she'd have to stay in hiding for the rest of Sunday's childhood for you all to say she's not using her. LOL

cj, they already left Scientology camp several weeks ago. I believe they are in Nashville. A fan sighting and a mention by Brad Schmitt...too much of a coincidence.

don't believe the lies said...

I don't understand how giving away millions to a charity to help others will negatively impact a baby that doesn't know the difference? The kid probably won't even care once they are old enough to understand. It will be old news and over and done with.

If it were me I'd do the same thing Angelina, JLo, Jessica, Jamie Lynn etc are doing. I think getting a picture or 2 out in the open might help deflect the paps once your out in public a little. Will they still bug you? Well yeah your famous and thats what happens. But I don't think it is as intense to get that first photo. Besides if they choose to donate the money it helps others. So why the hell not?!?

I believe Nicole is just pissed she isn't getting what she thinks her kid is worth and is embarassed. LOL Leaving the only excuse is we don't believe in selling our kids picture bullcrap. Blah, Blah, Blah.

dove said...

she didn't mind going on a cover with her sister's baby - is it not as 'special' as her own?

CJ said...

Who said anything about Scientology camp? Many kids attend more than one camp a summer if time and money allow. Both play sports - there are lots of sports camps around the nation not to mention fine arts and acting workshops.

I know I'm weird but if my baby pictures were fought over 1. I'd be honored that my name and photo were able to help others in some way. 2. Sorry to say this but I'd probably be flattered that more than one outlet wanted me and fought to get me. What woman doesn't want to feel wanted? While certainly other babies might get paid more for their picture most get nothing at all! I think I would feel special being among the few special wanted ones.

As for being "negatively impacted"... I think being abandoned by one or both parents and being raised by nannies and care givers so they could work because they wanted to instead of had to might do more damage. Moving daily from concert to concert or weekly to monthly from movie set to movie set, never getting to forge strong friendships or if friends were made having to leave them and move on to the next project, would impact me negatively. Always feeling fat standing next to mom could negatively impact my self esteem. Knowing I got my parents "old features", the ones they had surgically altered, wondering if they see the "not good enough" in me the way they saw it in themselves could negatively impact me as well.

maclen said...

dove said...
"she didn't mind going on a cover with her sister's baby - is it not as 'special' as her own?"

That's a good point, dove... she did use her sis's kid to shill for her movie in a magazine shoot...which is why I'm still leaning on kidman attempting a tomkat style magazine spread...for free...also like tomkat did. This whole baby pic BS is just like her talking point when everyone started to talk about how she was hardly seen with cruises kids... she wanted to keep that time "private", and now she wants to be "dignified". No one buys it and that is why you get the stories and the continued whispers about how she couldnt get her price for the pics as the true reason. Now she is left with either trying to be a tomkat copykat and splashing the kid in a self serving magazine cover piece, or simply giving the photos to a local newspaper, and generating as little interest as her wedding picture. Truly, this did not go as planned for kidman... but what was the main reason? Well jolie was reported to be due at least a month after kidman... but jolie delivered early... and kidman is evidently left with nothing.

stillhopefull said...

I like to think that Keith is at home with his new baby girl. Creating a bond that can never be broken. In my mind this is his and his child's best hope. Hopefully he has found what has been missing from his life, a precious new little being totally dependant on him and him totally willing to give her what she needs. If he learns what she needs now as a baby he will always be able to give her what she needs in the future. This to me would be the best thing Keith could do for himself and that little girl. And something Nicole could never take away.

wastedemotion said...

stillhopefull- Couldnt have said it better.

RC it's you and the rest of the obsessive lovers who need to get a clue.
Now it's about how bad the child MIGHT feel in the future....well why didnt you PROVIDE that EXCUSE earlier.....PUHLEASE.
It's about how much money she could get to buy more homes little Sunday will never see. And the money wasnt enough......YET.
I think anyone would be flattered to know the world was so curious to see them that X amount of dollars were donated to a charity. You know what I'd LOVE to see since they are so nobale, Keith and Nicole come out THEMSELVES and say you know what we're not willing to put a price tag on photos of our baby, her she is for you all to see, at the same time we do however think it's important to recognize her birth so we will personally be donating X amount of dollars to a charity of our choice.
I dont fault anyone for selling photos of their baby if they are smart enough to take advantage of the millions of people who live, breath, and die by the tabloid then good for them. If I could sell my babies photos for millions to give away you'd see the baby as fast as I could get those pics out. It's a matter of personal opinion RC that's the thing you continue to miss, so you think it's a shitty thing to do, we hear ya. Fine. Some of us just dont believe for one second Nicole isnt gonna pimp little Sunday out when the price is right.
I'll be more than happy to think she's a real mom who doesnt use her children for PR when she does that. For crying out loud did you miss the interview in which she said they dont even call her mom?! UH ok. Can you honestly tell me there is nothing wrong with that relationship....they dont call her mom CAUSE SHE ISNT ONE.
They left Scientology camp, how awesome you know this RC.....and just how did you come to know this? Of course Im going to beleive a fan saw them in Nashville, and of course Im going to believe Brad (I change my story as much as I change my underwear) Schmitt.) Dont you know people like Brad read the various message boards to get their stories....Im sure Brad saw the fan story and ran with it, only to be called out about it being false.
You and Sonora both continue to avoid the question:
Why do you continue to associate with a bunch of classless, foolish, lazy (couch potato), clueless, over pampered, bitches?! That just means you must love us! I certainly wouldnt hang around with someone if I felt those feelings towards them?! Makes ya wonder!

notachance said...

If you skeptics don't think any of those kids that came into this world with prices placed on their heads will need therapy at some point, you're mistaken. As they get older and realize just how mommy & daddy felt about their lives, forcing them to be in a PR infested world, they will most definitely be messed up. No, AJ and all the rest are not doing a good thing for their children - they are victimizing them in the name of charity, and that my skeptic friends, is disgusting.

wastedemotion said...

nota-
Everybody should be in therapy....come on. There are a hell of a lot of reasons any child could end up having a chip on his or her shoulder, dont try to act like one stupid picture for some amout of money is the be all end all. With the life Sunday will have Im sure at some point a little therapy will be in order even if her parents never get paid for a photo of her.
You want to act all noble like Keith and Nicole are doing something so grand by not taking money for a picture, that is just what Nicoles PR team wants you to think. You can say all you want it's wrong to pay for a babies picture and how sick it makes you. DO something about it, change the world, dont just sit on your ass and barf your bull shit on a message board. Im so sick of hearing it's the way things are, we're a media driven society....it doesnt have to be that way, if it makes you so sick, and you're so disgusted I suspect you never see movies, never watch tv, never buy a magazine, never read a newspaper, never listen to the radio, and so on and so on. Oh wait what's that you say, you do those things....oh the horror You're just feeding the monster.

Imahick said...

I have mixed feelings about it. The kids born to people like AJ/BP and KUNK are going to need therapy for more than the "selling" of their baby pictures for charity. These kids are thrust into the limelight ... and I doubt selling their baby pictures will be the catalyst for long term psychiatric problems. The constant media attention and the fact that their parents are too busy attending to their careers and personal agendas would be.

I like the idea of not pimping your kids, but the reality is that the press wants a picture of Sunday Rose. If they don't give them one, the paps are going to be trying harder than ever to get one. Of course ... NK would be happy with that type of reaction. Anything for a bit more attention.

So...it's a given that there WILL be a picture (candid or otherwise). If you just release a picture (as with the wedding) the one good thing that can come of it ... that being a charity getting a handsome contribution ... is lost. So, if KUNK really wants to protect this child and at the same time MAKE A DIFFERENCE in the world, do what AJ/BP did. Their goal may not be as philanthropic as they'd like us to believe but in the end, $11 million (or whatever the amount is) for a charity is really wonderful.

I personally have changed my mind after hearing the various arguments (and the DJ's on country stations have really kicked this one around) and think that KUNK should make a deal and get the $$ for charity.

I think she didn't do it out of embarrassment because the amount wasn't going to be as much as even MC's baby got. That tells you where NK's focus is. It's not the baby...it's not "moral"...it's about appearances.

notachance said...

I am disgusted with what our society has become and how it places such a high importance on actors and celebutants, unfortunately, I cannot go live in a cave to escape it.

This "bidding war" for baby pic's is probably the lowest it's gotten and shows just how much the American public actually thinks of itself. Sad state of affairs if you ask me.

wastedemotion said...

again Nota-
Do something about it.....plenty of people before you lived a happy life without a tv, newspaper, magazine, and so on.
You're so disgusted yet all you want to do is bitch about it here.....you are part of the problem. Im sure you arent alone in your feelings maybe a message board where you can discuss how horrible sociey has become would be a better place for you.

notachance said...

Geez wasted, I thought it was about being allowed to have an OPINION. That is what all you skeptics keep saying, isn't it????

Guess it's only a one-way street around here, eh?

And btw - I, atleast, read a newspaper, unlike the throngs of lemmings out there that don't ever pick one up but rush out to Wallyworld or wherever to pick up the latest rag/trash magazine to get the latest on the celebs. I'll take a newspaper anyday over that thank you very much.

maclen said...

Just noticed the latest... and first pap pic in over 20 days on the home page.... yep, kidman looks about 98% back to her emaciated and anorexic self... the workouts did the job of keeping hers, and the kids weight down. Boy, you'd think kidman would be delighted by that, but in these pap pics, (by the way unscheduled photo's, you see kidman isnt mugging and waving to the paps... no more bump to shill...) kidman looks like she's on the way to the guillotine....but then it's not hard to imagine she is not a very happy camper right now...her PR pregnancy is a bust... and speaking of busts... she also never got those "big boobs" she was looking forward to from being pregnant...she's still at the implants level... her bust was a bust!...I'd also imagine kate hudson stepping on the headlines for getting a specially written role in kidman's next film is an added bummer...how the overhyped kidman has fallen.

maclen said...

...ps...

..oh yeah, forgot to note... these are not planted or scheduled paparatz pics... if you'll notice JJ nor GG has these pics posted... JJ simply has a buried blurb..."kidman shows off post baby body"... no interest in first post baby body pic? Can you say "hasbeen?"

CJ said...

Mattress shopping 10 days after delivery? Nicole, you get the crib matress BEFORE the baby comes home. You can call and they will deliver too. Not like you just broke the bed you currently have. If it's waited this long it could wait a little longer. Maybe she just found out Keith still has the bed from an old girlfriend in storage and threw a fit. At least the photo is a different location from Starbucks, the mall/bookstore, working out. Oh right, it's not a Kidman approved photo op.

CJ said...

maclen, I see it on GG, JJ, and People.com. For an unsanctioned photo op it sure hit lots of places at one time... Maybe they just forgot to act happy. She is a poor actress after all.

CJ said...

"We are in heaven," the actress, 41, said in an e-mail to New York Post columnist Liz Smith. "Can't stop staring at her in complete awe. Feeling incredibly blessed to have been given this precious little angel."

So she's talking to the Post after the Cindi story?!?

"Keith Urban, 40, was spotted making a Starbucks run in Nashville on Tuesday, nine days after he and Kidman welcomed their daughter."

And no one got a picture? Oh right, he only gets photographed when she is with him. Like the next day mattress shopping. I wonder if he took the baby out without Nic if anyone would photograph it?

Urban Myths said...

Thought you would enjoy Perez's comment today...

No Love For Nicole

America does not care for Nicole Kidman.

Industry insiders reveal exclusively to PerezHilton.com that last week's People magazine cover with "Nicole Kidman's Baby Joy" was a sales DUD.

Meanwhile, Us Weekly and In Touch's Madonna covers, which competed against Kidman on newsstands, enjoyed solid sales.

"People sold WAY less than it normally does," sources tell us.

It's a good thing they didn't pay for her baby pictures then!

maclen said...

CJ said...
"maclen, I see it on GG, JJ, and People.com. For an unsanctioned photo op it sure hit lots of places at one time..."

yeah cj, when I posted, they were not up on JJ or GG yet... which would indicate a non scheduled photo op... they are making up for lost time now. And as for perez hilton, Urban Myths, it's payback time for the phoney "exclusive" inept team kidman fed him...and the email to the post from ITK is hilarious... the scrambling for PR failure resuscitation... as I said earlier... kidman does not look like a very happy camper!

Sonora_Melody said...

re: Perez' comment

Ah, he's quoting from non-existent "insiders" again? The same ones who told him the Urbans will have a baby boy?

Why should People magazine expect a jump in sales when they are simply using old photos of Keith and Nicole. There's not even any interview with either one of them. Next time, People Magazine, if you want to increase sales, don't just recycle old photos.

doublewide said...

where are her boobs????? they look really happy don't they? my my....

as for pimping out babies, i agree with imahick

maclen said...

doublewide said...
"where are her boobs????? they look really happy don't they? my my...."

Over at dlisted, doublewide, they're asking the same thing, and hoping the orb is the one breastfeeding... well, kidman is bummed... all celebs delivering lately it seems got to parade their pregnancy boobs... halle berry, salma hayek, jessica alba....jolie soon... they all got fawned over by the gossip sites... and comicially kidman is still left with her milk duds...and now Urban Myths has squashed the fansies phoney stories by showing the pic of connor cruise at the ESPYS with beckham... and apparently not in nashville with evil "stepmom"... and yes, I'm aware...wait for it... bella may still be in Nashville!!!! Nothing has gone right for kidman.... but she still evidently has JJ to explain to a disinterested country she is "mattress" shopping. To paraphrase kanye west... by way of a livid perez hilton..."America does not like kidman!"... uh...people!

doublewide said...

LOL maclen! milk duds....that's a hoot

doncha just love that pic of connor and beckham?

spin spin spin
lie lie lie
plant plant plant

and off topic, keith has confirmed he will be at the stadium show in philly on saturday night. he confirmed it on his monkeyland site.

Imahick said...

So...are we to believe that Connor and Bella flew in for a day or two with NK? He was taking a flying lesson in LA on July 12th and then, this picture. I don't think they were in Nashville at all, but if they were, it was one of those dash in, do what you gotta do and get the heck out of Dodge. It doesn't seem like they want to be bothered much with her.

Tara said...

I don't think we are to believe that.
There is one person who stopped those rumors and his name is Tom Cruise.
Guess there is still some tension between he and Kidman. Connor wouldn't have been photographed if it wasn't planned.

maclen said...

It does seem strange that connor would be at the espys without cruise...after I saw the pic I checked... cruise I dont think was there... so seemingly cruise wanted to squash those fansie's rumor. I think that even the fansies are becoming embarrassed by kidman's lack of maternal concern for cruise's kids...trying to start false rumors. As for the new kid, for supposedly not wanting to "exploit' the kid, kidman seems to have become chatty about it releasing a email by her failed writer school dropout on staff... and now the orb from what I read, is shilling the kid on his web site...so your telling me kidman is not going to exploit this kid for publicity for her next film flop?

undecided said...

and now the orb from what I read, is shilling the kid on his web site..

I think he's trying to make sure people know he's showing up at the next stadium show. Wouldn't want to get Kenny all pissed off.

notachance said...

"I think he's trying to make sure people know he's showing up at the next stadium show. Wouldn't want to get Kenny all pissed off."

I don't think Kenny has anything to do with it, it's to let the fans know he will be there. Tix are still bought, what the hell does Kenny care?

maclen said...

undecided said...
"and now the orb from what I read, is shilling the kid on his web site..

I think he's trying to make sure people know he's showing up at the next stadium show. Wouldn't want to get Kenny all pissed off."

Well that's going to be their predicament after the phoney self righteousness over the "distasteful" practice of selling the pics... it gives many a pause over what is distasteful exploitation in their own actions... for I have no doubt the orb will surely use this kid...he already has... on his fawnsite to attempt to drum up pr for his next shows...or his next cd...and certainly kidman I have no doubt will do a baby magazine spread nearing the release of her next film flop...money for charity or not. That is what they do... exploit their personal life for their public image... unless when kidman couldnt get her at least 3 mill for her pics... then it's "distasteful" the sell them... yes and the baby magazine spread...or the cd of "baby" inspired songs is now going to look dignified or unexploitative?

undecided said...

"I think he's trying to make sure people know he's showing up at the next stadium show. Wouldn't want to get Kenny all pissed off."

I don't think Kenny has anything to do with it, it's to let the fans know he will be there. Tix are still bought, what the hell does Kenny care?


Well first of all I was being a little sarcastic, sorry you didn't catch that. I can see Keith is letting the fans know. What Kenny has to do with it is that it's his show and I don't think a man who performs with a squashed foot appreciates a no show on his bill.

notachance said...

I don't think there was ever going to be a no-show for Keith on the stadium tour. That birth was planned so that he didn't miss a concert beat. He posted that message for his fans that really thought he might back out because THEY are naive about it.

CJ said...

Keith said at a meet & greet months ago he might miss a show in July. I assume that's why he posted the message to let fans know that things worked out time wise and he wouldn't be missing a show after all.

Does Nic have an official website? NKU isn't officially hers, though I think she might sponsor it. Before Nic Keith used to say "Never believe any rumors about me unless they come from me.". I think that's why he posted the baby news on his website. He also posted the "We're in Oz to get married" story in 2006. Without holding a press conference and doing it personally a web site posting is really the only way to get word out there. Let's face it. AP get so many stories it's hard to tell what's true and what's not. If it's on his website it's obviously true.

CJ said...

Tom & Kate, I'm a lady of my word, though I had to guess at the charity of your choice. A donation has been made in your honor to Children's Hospice & Palliative Care Coalition.

Sonora_Melody said...

"CJ said...
Mattress shopping 10 days after delivery?"

So?? No one has any idea if they are shopping for a guest room or a replacement for what they already have.

The skeptics and NK-haters who post here are way too judgmental to the point of being lunatic and ridiculous.

Take a word from your buddy Anna who posted on her blog "I'm taking the weekend off from blogging, quite ridiculous to harp on about Kidman's parenting while ignoring my own offspring."

Lisa said...

If his mummy is ill. I hope the mattress is a new organic one for her to come down to Nashville to stay. Nothing but the best for Marieanne

maclen said...

cj said...
"Does Nic have an official website? NKU isn't officially hers, though I think she might sponsor it. "

Cj, I'd say after this pathetic attempt by NKU to try to shill this rumor that cruise's kids were in nashville to try and cover her atrocious maternal instinct, or complete lack thereof... makes them another mouthpiece for kidman... another plant and leak "shrub", if you will. Trouble for kidman is that all the paltry "sprinkling of water" her and there... and piling of manure is not resulting in any healthy growth of postitive publicity...although with the state of her career and movies... I'd recommend kidman switch to trying to cultivate and grow vegetables... for certainly her audience has actually "vegged out"...

maclen said...

Well, certainly all the manure piling and BS flinging is not going to spin this out of this point of fact reality...

http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article.html?in_article_id=225342&in_page_id=7&in_a_source=

... seems like the huge budgeted films are likely out of kidmans reach... and the $100 k film roles will be her future... baby or no baby, kidman is not a good film investment. As I said before look for the weinstein Co. to tank in the coming year!

undecided said...

cj said...
"Does Nic have an official website? NKU isn't officially hers, though I think she might sponsor it. "


I believe she sponsors it since the main helpers/posters, whatever they are called seem to have unlimited funds to travel and report on Keith and Nicole. They also have access to info that no one else seems to and they members used to speak of 'asking Foxy's big toe' for confirmation of rumors. Hope it's not the big toe that just got fired.

CJ said...

I believe NK sponsors NKU because a few years ago the owner was running low on funds and threatening to shut down. She "magically" got an influx of cash and was able to keep going. I assume they kiss NK butt so much so she doesn't withdraw funding. NK probably thinks fans talking positively about her looks better than her having her own website and they can say things she could never get away with posting herself on her own site. It's also cheaper and less time consuming to fund NKU than host her own site as well - she's not going to waste any more time on her fans than absolutely necessary.

CJ said...

JJ leak of the oh so happy couple: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/07
/20/nicole-kidman-starbucks/

maclen said...

Ha... yes an official JJ leaked showing... but kidman cant even pretend to look mildy "consious"... she looks totally in the dumps...yes, a second "dead man walking" photo op in a row... although for this official photo op, she adjusted to looser fitting clothing after the non existant bump the first time... kidman must be finding out about now that motherhood is not actually what she expected it to be... it will not "magically" fix all her career or any personal problems she may have...and I certainly believe she has alot of both of those issues... the PR factor certainly didnt go as she expected... jolie delivered very early and stole all her thunder... no first baby money bonanza... she's reduced to giving them away for free... and no doubt the reality of a 24/7 bundle of responsibility...well actually only about 4/3 for kidman, I'd say...yet factoring in all those bothersome questions from the volley of nannies like ... "would you like to try and burp your baby today, instead of studing your script, your highness?" ...happy days are no longer here kidman...

maclen said...

...ps...

another afterthought... so on the subject of postpartum depression... is kidman the type who brings it up, and "suddenly" becomes an advocate of bringing it to "much needed" attention via her oh so "powerful high profile"... another press conference for her!... just as brooke shields did...oh yeah! remember the brouhaha between shields and kidman ex cruise? Looks like she has another opportunity to link herself once again in media headlines...and the medias eagerness to bring up any controversy about cruise and Sci-tol is such a tempting opportunity for desperate kidman, I would guess. Or will she save it for another "sensational" magazine cover story of mind blowing revelations... Kidman suffers postpartum! Well if it does come up, remember you saw it her first! on Urban Myths...via yours truly....

CJ said...

lol maclen. I just got online for the day - hit forehead and now um. I just mentioned in an email to Anna I expect a postpartum story from them to come out soon. Great minds think alike.

CJ said...

http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/zwecker/1067167,CST-FTR-zp22.article

"NOT MY KID! While Nicole Kidman strongly believes celebrities have a responsibility to ''pay back'' and support charitable causes, don't look for her and husband Keith Urban to sell photos of new daughter Sunday for big bucks.

An Australian friend of Kidman's says the Oscar winner thinks it a bit ''tacky'' to cash in on their child's first photos -- marketing them to one of the magazines willing to pay millions.

Yet, the Kidman source stresses this is not a criticism of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's reported plan to sell first shots of their new twins to one of the a celeb mags. ''She thinks it's great all the money is going to charity, it's just that Nicole would rather make her charitable contributions in a different way."

Yeah, she teleconferences them in. And black work out pants up her butt aren't tacky? At least an Aussie friend is a tad more believable than a TN friend.