Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Something seems to be missing...

Have you noticed that Keith Urban is never seen with his daughter?

Yes, he was there with the sling on the set. But we haven't seen one picture of them together, of Daddy actually holding her in public; not just in fuzzy shadows sneaking into a house. So why would that be? Could it be that Nicold would be jealous? Could it be that Keith has no regard for his daughter?

Perhaps it's because he doesn't need to have anyone see her with him to prove to the world what kind of parent he is; it's not necessary. Too bad his wife couldn't learn from that.

100 comments:

maclen said...

Actually, Urban Myths, it's no such a huge leap of the imagination to believe a addict/alcholic who seemingly can be so easily convinced to go along with kidman's garrish and feeble photo ops, would also be just as clueless on the subject of fatherhood...no matter how many well publicized readings of "How to be a parent" or "Fatherhood for Dummies". He quite simply goes along with her on her calculated photo ops... the slow and obvious unveiling of her PR baby... she carries the "laundry bag"..she holds the kid smothered to her chest so the press cant get the clear photo out in public, not the orb.
As for this new revelation of the "magical" Oz fertility waters... chalk that ridiculous statement to the shameless OZ tourism shilling...which this film was made for...add it to the kidman Sideshow and Baby Press Tour... so "Travel to Oz and sit...or drink, in the magic Aussie water and you too can concieve a child! It all fits into kidman's make believe fantasy world...

Lisa said...

Something else seems to be missing.... Keith's HAIR!!! It's thinning again. Is he letting some out??

notachance said...

Keith's hair has been "thinned" for a long time now, it's just that all that plaster he's been using for the past couple of years to keep it place has covered that up. Now if it's a tad bit messy you get to see what "she" sees after the door closes - someone who looks more like Shane than you'd think.

Maybe it is closer to a match made in heaven than any skeptic realizes.....

hoosierlady said...

Why don't they both dress in matching outfits, and visit a hair clinic here in the good ole' USA. We do hair transplants, moving hair follicles from the hairy areas to the BALD ones. Seems to work a lot of the time.

Then, they can go on a romantic adventure, each helping the other with the head guard and head massages that are necessary to maintain the transplant.

And since the area will be sore, they can use that as a joint excuse for a FULL WEEKEND OFF from the tireless child care they both do.

A440 said...

I, too, am suspicious of Keith's not being photographed with his daughter. Let's look at the options here:

1. They have an understanding that Kidman will have contact with the baby and - at least publicly - Keith will have minimal or no contact.

2. He didn't want a child.

3. He didn't want a child at this time.

4. He didn't want a girl.

5. He still scared of working with her. Fearful of making mistakes.

Comments, pro and con?

hoosierlady said...

I vote she won't let him hold her in public, she needs the press

Imahick said...

A440 said: "1. They have an understanding that Kidman will have contact with the baby and - at least publicly - Keith will have minimal or no contact."

This is what I believe. NK wants the public to see her with this child as much as possible, even if she looks awkward and uncomfortable with her. I don't think this child is intended to get too close to Keith, certainly not publically. I bet it's NK insisting on portraying the "correct image" of a loving nurturing mother, even if it looks like she could do without the thing in the sling and squished little Sunday's head into her chest almost suffocating her, when showing us how much she loves her. Right. I saw that NK...and I believe you. You are so maternal, it's unbelieveable. Really...it is actually UNBELIEVEABLE.

I don't think he wanted a child at this time and I honestly think he found out just prior to the announcement about this pregnancy in January. She was just barely pregnant when she went public with it, and I think he looked less than thrilled in most of the barage of pap pictures in Jan. For a first time Papa...you'd think he'd have a smile on his face in at least a few pictures. Instead, he looked his usual ticked off perturbed "victim" of the paps...

As far as the fertility water, it's interesting that the timing doesn't make much sense as far as the pregnancy thing. They wrapped filming in Kunannera on Sept 8th...so if she got pregnant through swimming in the waters, it was a very long gestation or a delayed fertilization! Tying the pregnancy to the "fertility" waters is simply a way of tying her pregnancy to the movie and Australia. Its all good for tourism and promotions, right? Even if it makes Keith look like his involvement in the whole affair was no more extensive than painting her toe nails. Mind you, maybe that WAS the extent of his involvement.

realitycheck said...

Oh give me a break. If Keith was photographed holding Sunday Rose recently you all would say Nicole was being the bad mum. You aren't fooling anyone Umyths. And lifting topics directly from the E! board with the exact same theories behind it is just lazy.

maclen said...

Imahick said...
"Tying the pregnancy to the "fertility" waters is simply a way of tying her pregnancy to the movie and Australia."

Yes, kidman's shameless and blatant PR baby and Australia movie tie in's have begun... and as the baz has so shallowly sold out to the Oz tourism board and accepted their 50 mill to shill for the country, kidman is ratcheting up her "priceless" and "tasteful" baby to be cynically used and exploited to help with the PR of this mess of a movie... cause dont you know, this movie has miraculously blessed kidman through the Aussie magical fertility waters they have down their with the miracle of childbirth... so people should go down and get "healed" of their red eye...rickets and scurvy... and other such nonsense...

ecoaster70 said...

I'm going with Keith not having to prove to the world..unlike Nicole.

Speaking of proving to the world, did anybody here call out Nicole for revealing more of Sunday Rose as soon as Keith left to go back to Nashville? If you did, congratulations, you win. Check out the worship site. Look whose face get revealed. Keith heads back to Nashville & out comes Sunday Rose's face.

Keith & Nicole apparantly had a dinner date on Tuesday night in London, funny that no pictures of that outing were found. Or no pictures of Nicole at the Madonna concert, but yet they seem to catch her with Sunday Rose. Wonder how that happens??

Casse Role said...

lol! I see RC is still around playing sort of like the Human "Spell Check." Although she isn't fixing the spelling, (not just yet) It seems coming here and saying stories are incorrect or from a different board probably makes her feel all warm and fuzzy inside (sort of like Nicole's hat).
Aww.

As far as the "Magic Waters" are concerned, many radio stations are getting a huge laugh out of it. Good Going Nic! There may be a spot on Last Comic Standing for you.

Urban Myths said...

Note to RC:
The blog entries are not always published on the days they are written. If there seems to be similarities to threads on other boards or blogs it is purely coincidence.

Choice said...

Interesting the comments here referring to Keith's hair. I thought it often looked too perfect to be true for a 40 year old. And of course his brother Shane has a strong receding hairline. Is it a poorly kept secret in the Keith Urban fan club that he has hair weaving too?

notachance said...

I don't think Keith has had a weave, I think if his hair was swept back we would see the same hairline as Shane's. There's a reason why men comb forward folks....

notachance said...

The child has been revealed at NKU. She's adorable.

ecoaster70 said...

Saw those photos. Do you think Kidman waited for Keith's plane to even leave the runway before stepping out to give the paps a face shot or just waited until he left the hotel?

Interesting fact about photos of children in England...newspapers can't put out their face shots without parental consent. This information came courtesy from the folks at NKU. She knows damn well the photogs are there. She's looking straight at them in one of the photos. No driver, nanny or diaper bag in sight. I guess she didn't want anybody else in the shot to ruin the "miracle baby" photo, not even the baby's father.

Sonora_Melody said...

"She knows damn well the photogs are there. She's looking straight at them in one of the photos."

Those photos were clearly taken with a zoom lens. I'm almost certain the photos were quite a distance away.

I have been to some Keith concerts where I have used zoom to capture close-ups of Keith. In many instances, he appeared to be looking "straight at me", but I can assure you he wasn't.

It sounds to me like you haven't used a camera very much. Try it sometime. You would be amazed at what you can capture with a camera with a high optical zoom.

hoosierlady said...

What kind of wager do you have for the scenario. . .

Keith says no pap pictures, no, no, no. Especially in light of the R. Dunn comment regarding Keith's description of Sunday hearing nothing but cameras hitting to top of the cars, but. . .

Nicole says yes yes yes.

Keith leaves. . .

And the rest, my friends, is on NKU.

TexasCourtJester said...

For those of us who refuse to visit NKU there are also pictures of SY at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1062715/Proud-mother-Nicole-Kidman-shows-miracle-baby-Sunday-Rose-time.html

putz said...

I have been a "watcher" for over a year, and I just have to finally say something.

Why in all of the pictures we see lately of Nicole and Sunday Rose..Nicole is wearing a coat and hat..in another words, warm clothes..but Sunday Rose is in a short sleeved dress..a bare little head, it isn't summer..put some warmer clothes on the poor little thing.

Common sense?!..please use it Nicole

maclen said...

Actually, this is still just "half" a reveal, and yes, another offfical kidman arranged photo op... as all the other "first photos" of baby kidman didnt actually show her face. And it seems that her last sneak peak "first photo" ...the "smothering" one, didnt garner any more clamour about the kid... even GG, who had those pics as I pointed out, didnt even mention the kid... so now we have "half" a reveal which kidman hopes will build the clamour for baby pics... and expect the "full" reveal to still be a movie tie in magazine spread... with the ridiculous before mentioned Oz miracle waters included..

maclen said...

putz said...
"Why in all of the pictures we see lately of Nicole and Sunday Rose..Nicole is wearing a coat and hat..in another words, warm clothes..but Sunday Rose is in a short sleeved dress..a bare little head, it isn't summer..put some warmer clothes on the poor little thing."

Because, putz, the point is this is an obvious pre arranged photo op to slowy, little by little, reveal the baby... if she used the "laundry bag"... or bundles up the kid as she had previously, she couldnt reveal the kid... with kidman it's about the PR, and certainly not about any motherly common sense...

stillhopefull said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
hoosierlady said...

Firstly and foremost-putz, you are absolutely right. Kid's going to have ear infections, and other upper respiratory problems, that can easily be solved with a HAT.

2nd. I have been thinking that someone should explain to Nicole in regard to the reason for conception of offspring. The water didn't do it, hon.

If someone doesn't, she might reproduce again.

Imahick said...

Sunday Rose is a beautiful little baby. I think Keith wanted to keep the baby from being photographed by the paps, because, as he said, he and NK have chosen the limelight...Sunday has had no choice. But Kidman has clearly elected to reveal the baby little by little. Now we see most of her face.

This was a calculated exposure. She made sure not have a blanket on (even though she's dressed for chilly weather) or even anything on the baby's head. She WANTED the picture out there...mission accomplished.

She looks as awkward as usual carrying the child. I feel sorry for Sunday. What a life to look forward to.

ecoaster70 said...

SM, get your head out of your ass. She knew damn well they were there. She's been doing nothing but kissing up to the paps since her so called bodyguard smacked around that photographer. They just happened to find her coming out of some hotel in London? What happened to the Dorchester or that house they were supposedly renting? Just like they just happened to find her walking around a busy Portabello Rd district just after Keith made that Mr Mom comment. Now Nicole makes that stupid ass comment about the fertility waters, Keith leaves for Nashville and now we get facial shots of the miracle baby? Nicole isn't doing anything to prevent photos. Even the odd way she's positioning her right hand give a perfect view of the baby's face.

This was nothing but a staged photo-op which conviently took place as soon as Keith left the country.

ShutUpAndSing said...

I believe that there is a PR motive behind EVERY thing that woman says or does.

imahick, thanks for finding the date they wrapped filming Kunannera.

realitycheck said...

Just a reminder she never said to the paps I refuse to let anyone take a picture. She just said give us our space. Personally I think they are doing the right thing. Going about their lives and if the baby is out with them, keeping her comfortable without smothering her. No covering her in ridiculous-sized hats, bonnets, or doing something awful like covering her head with a blanket.

And for those of you that are so upset at the timing of this photo, or any other photo you need to really think about that. Because the tabs, magazines, and internet sites that posts these pics don't give a rat's ass about country music. Keith could be doing a week of shows at the Opry, not just tomorrow's show, and they wouldn't cover it. So her pics aren't intruding on Keith. Its just that you all want no photos of her at all. Or so you say...*wink wink*

UM...sure, I'll believe that when pigs fly. This isn't the first time.

Sonora, you are exactly right. 18 years ago I stood in line overnight for tickets to a concert in my small town. A local news station came by in the morning and covered the event. I had won a free CD from the radio station that was also camped out there. I had no idea cameras were on me at all that whole morning. I watched the evening news that night and there I was. They got me and a close-up of my hands holding the CD. This was was almost 2 decades ago. Zoom lenses can get amazing shots from a ways away.

Sonora_Melody said...

putz -
This is the FIRST time that Sunday was pictured in a short-sleeved dress. Are you telling me you could see through all her wraps/blankets in previous photos to tell what she was wearing underneath? LMAO!

How quickly the skeptics and NK haters forget that they have always ridiculed Nic for wearing many layers of clothes while most everyone were wearing sleeveless or short-sleeved clothes. Hello! Just go back and check any number of posts about her attire in those Nashville sightings through her pregnancy and shortly after Sunday's birth. It looks to me like Sunday is more like her daddy and did not need as many layers of clothes as her mom. At any rate, according to my friends in London, it was quite warm yesterday. So it does look like Sunday was appropriately dressed for the weather.

hoosierlady said...

OK, putz, you're ok, do not listen to these people.

I repeat, do not listen to RC or SM. I think these people may be Nicole moles.

Normally, you bring the child home from the hospital, you stay with the child, nursing, cuddling, feeding, singing, etc. Then, as the child gets a little older, you begin to venture out a bit. With the kid. Because usually, the mommy doesn't want to leave the child. That's part of the reasoning behind the 6 week time off from work, is for the mom and the baby to bond.

Normally, in September, you would have the child in lightweight layers, which, she may have, I do not know. But, usually, doctors suggest that you put a hat on the head of the child because you lose most of your body heat through your head. I am not saying huge hat, just a little tobogon would do. Nicole won't walk across the street without her hat, but, she's the mommy, and mommies rule.

You cannot apply normalcy to these people. These people are not normal. In fact, I think the reason I am even here is because it's, (i.e. KUNK) is such a freak show.

It's ok, putz, shake it off. I'm your bud.

ecoaster70 said...

RC, I could give a rats ass if the tabs cover a Keith show. What I do give a rats ass about is the fact that all these little reveals of Sunday Rose by Nicole come conveniently as soon as Keith leaves. Coincidence? Doubt it. Makes me wonder who really wants to protect Sunday Rose's privacy.

Sonora_Melody said...

"hoosierlady said...
Normally, you bring the child home from the hospital, you stay with the child, nursing, cuddling, feeding, singing, etc. Then, as the child gets a little older, you begin to venture out a bit. With the kid. Because usually, the mommy doesn't want to leave the child. That's part of the reasoning behind the 6 week time off from work, is for the mom and the baby to bond."

'Doctor' hoosierlady: did you preach that to the likes of JLo? Let's see ... since the twins' birth, she was busy training for the triathlon, spent all week at the recent NY fashion shows being photographed with her gal pals, and flew to Milan this week to attend the fashion shows with her gal pals. And the same can be said about Jessica Alba and Christina Aguilera. They have been busy attending fashion shows. Yet no one question about how much time they spend with their babies.

btw ... how would you know that Nic is not already doing "nursing,cuddling, feeding, singing, etc". She brings Sunday to the movie set. It's so easy for her to be with her baby in between takes or rehearsals. That's an advantage most working moms don't have, i.e. child care right at work.

cynicalbeautiful said...

I said LATELY Sunday Rose hasn't been covered well, go back and reread my post.

Common sense tells you to dress your child as you do..from the latest pictures both Keith and Nicole are wearing warm clothes..why not baby too?

Never said I was a skeptic or a hater. Just stating simple facts.

Thank you everyone for the positive words

*Changed name from putz..note to self..next time check what hubby had for screen name before posting!

hoosierlady said...

I bent reality so I could be with my kids.

I apologize, I have not been following JLo, (or her bottom), Christine, or anyone else for that matter. My obsession seems to be with KUNK's show. I guess I'm just amazed by the inconsistency in her prattle. When KU got out of the rehab, didn't she tell us she no longer would have to live through her work? (please excuse the paraphrase). That she had learned family first? OK, then, if I'm not mistaken, after the oscar win, she was so downhearted that she didn't have anyone to eat pancakes with? I can go on and on, as you are well aware. The thing that began this crazy obsession was the staggering amount of duplicated quotes, as I have said before, I started noticing she said the same things about Tom as she still does about Keith. It's mind boggling to me to think that human beings are this shallow. I'm sorry, but I think back on my lovers, and I do not think I would say the same things about one as the other. Nope, sorry, no can do. Maybe she's just so limited that she only has a predetermined amount of replies she gives to the press. I don't know. All I can say for sure is this, she misrepresents herself.

And thats Hoosier Lady, R.N., to you, and you can **** my black ass.

Imahick said...

"Sonora Melody said: 'Doctor' hoosierlady: did you preach that to the likes of JLo? Let's see ... since the twins' birth, she was busy training for the triathlon, spent all week at the recent NY fashion shows ..."

First of all...this is about Kidman, so let's not bring other spoiled celebs into it. JLo, Alba, and the others are irrelevant.

Second of all, who has been whining for YEARS about wanting a baby? About slowing down if she was with the love of her life? Blah Blah Blah. She has said this crap to make sure the public has a softer more "maternal" view of her. She's been trying to warm up that icy image for a long long time. And the average person might even buy it. But anyone actually paying attention to what she says would realize that this is all about the "correct image." She speaks with a forked tongue.

These recent pictures show a woman with a smug grin on her face, holding a baby like she isn't quite sure how to do it. She looks awkward and uncomfortable. She is dressed for chilly weather...the BABY is wearing a cotton short sleeved dress without anything on her head.

NK hasn't got a maternal bone in her body. Everytime I see her with that child she looks like she'd rather be cuddling a botox syringe...than a baby. She looks anything but motherly toward Sunday.

Imahick said...

Sonora Melody said: "How quickly the skeptics and NK haters forget that they have always ridiculed Nic for wearing many layers of clothes while most everyone were wearing sleeveless or short-sleeved clothes. Hello! Just go back and check any number of posts about her attire in those Nashville sightings through her pregnancy and shortly after Sunday's birth. It looks to me like Sunday is more like her daddy and did not need as many layers of clothes as her mom. At any rate, according to my friends in London, it was quite warm yesterday."

I checked the temperature for London over the last 48 hr. It was 12-20 Celcius (52.6-68 Fahrenheit). Not that warm for a baby. Not warm enough to have her out with no hat and nothing on her bare arms. Sorry. I don't accept that. I'm not sure it warrents a wool coat ala Kidman, but you'd think that she'd at least dress the baby appropriately for the weather.

Sonora_Melody said...

"Not warm enough to have her out with no hat and nothing on her bare arms. Sorry. I don't accept that."

Excuse me? What arrogance! That's NOT your baby. How do you know that Sunday wasn't dressed warmly first and they had to remove the layers because she didn't like them. She seemed to be sleeping contentedly in her mother's arms. The only people who would know first-hand how to dress her appropriately are the ones with her. It seemed like the London based media who came out first with the sighting reports never mentioned anything about Sunday not being dressed warmly enough. They would be the first to know about the temperature in that area, and I'm sure would not miss a chance to criticize if that were the case.

And Hoosier – keep your dirty as$ and foul language to yourself.

Choice said...

I have to say that Baby Sundae is quite adorable from what I can tell in these new photos. People have been saying that Nicole is holding her, but that is not Nicole. It is Great Grandma Kidman remember. GET IT RIGHT!

hoosierlady said...

And Hoosier – keep your dirty as$ and foul language to yourself.

I apologize for the expletive. However, you might want to go back a couple of days to where we discussed sarcasm?!

Choice said...

Check out the photo of Nicole heading off to work the other day on my Blog. If that is what they call a 'style icon', then I getting a brand new wardrobe and a makeover.

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/

Aus said...

Over on one of the baby blogs, the people there that were in the same area as Nicole said Nicole was overdressed for the weather. They said the baby was dressed properly. It never amazes me how you folks here will grab at anything you can to attack Nicole. You can't say she isn't with her baby so you look for some other reason to attack. Sunday looks peaceful and content in her mother's arms. Also, Nicole and Keith NEVER said no photos were allowed to be taken of Sunday. They just said to not put the cameras right up in her face. These photos were obviously taken with a long lens from far away. Nicole is not even looking into any camera.

Imahick said...

If you think that 52-68 degrees is warm enough for a baby, in a dress with short sleeves and no hat outdoors...then our standards of child care are different.

As far as SM saying "Excuse me? What arrogance! That's NOT your baby. How do you know that Sunday wasn't dressed warmly first and they had to remove the layers because she didn't like them. She seemed to be sleeping contentedly in her mother's arms. The only people who would know first-hand how to dress her appropriately are the ones with her..."

This is that attitude many people who don't want to get involved have...and so they ignore abusive situations. Children have died because of that kind of indifference. The way NK was hauling that baby around in the sling was not correct and put the child at risk. Now she's inappropriately dressed. Her other two children have been neglected emotionally. (Oh...that's right, she is raising them by webcam...I forgot how devoted she is to her "adopted" children)

Seriously, you guys would justify NK's actions, even if they involved physical violence. Oh..that's right. You already did justify her behavior when it involved physical violence toward the photographers. OK...it's all quite clear. She can do no wrong and you guys will support her actions no matter what. Blind devotion is not becoming.

Casse Role said...

Sonora_Melody said...
"Not warm enough to have her out with no hat and nothing on her bare arms. Sorry. I don't accept that."

Excuse me? What arrogance! That's NOT your baby. How do you know that Sunday wasn't dressed warmly first and they had to remove the layers because she didn't like them."

Hmm, well EXCUSE ME, how Do you know? You are only speculating as well. Just makes sense if you see somone out and about with a coat and a hat, that their child would be dressed the same. I have yet to see anyone dressed opposite of their baby or child in any photos.

Maybe someone wearing a sweater and the child none. Either way, how can you say it's not your baby, when in reality it is not yours either?

Sonador, you and RC seem to have many similarities, did you perhaps forget to log out of your other name? Just asking...

A440 said...

Scope out the latest Globe jpg from the Tabloid Hound page.

If this is correct, then (a) Nicole is still clueless as to how to deal with babies; it's more proof that she had minimal contact with Bella and Connor when they were with her and (b) she's tangling with stress and tension that's so bad, she considered post-partum depression as the cause.

Methinks this poser has taken on more than she can handle. Let's see if she can straighten herself out in time to shill for "Australia."

realitycheck said...

I don't care what side of the fence you're on. If anyone believes that latest Globe story then they really do need a reality check!

And BTW, I take your pleas not to listen to us as a compliment hoosier. We know we're not out on the fringes and you know it too.

Ive been accused of being a bunch of people that I'm not since KUNK got together and its hilarious. I'm also employed by Nicole and Monkeyville dontcha know!

casse, the multi-screen name bit is as old as the hills. Maybe every skeptic who posts on UM is really the same person! LMAO

Casse Role said...

RC said...casse, the multi-screen name bit is as old as the hills. Maybe every skeptic who posts on UM is really the same person! LMAO

Being serious here. You both sound the same. So I was just asking. Not saying Sonrodor would tell me the truth. And funny (just saying) How You answered me, and Not Snorador. Not a biggy.

woriedmonkey said...

NK: re Russell 's 2 year old boy Tennyson getting together with Sunday Rose,

"I'm a great believer in arranged marriages".

She said it herself !

Sonora_Melody said...

"Imahick said...
This is that attitude many people who don't want to get involved have...and so they ignore abusive situations. Children have died because of that kind of indifference. The way NK was hauling that baby around in the sling was not correct and put the child at risk. Now she's inappropriately dressed."

If you really feel that strongly and "want to get involved", go ahead, report her to the appropriate authorities for what you term "abusive situations". If I feel strongly about what I see as potential child abuse risks, that's what I would do.

As to how she was carrying the sling, check out how that particular sling should be used:
http://www.serenaandlily.com/Baby/Market-Sling-Flax-Blue/Market-Sling-Flax-Sky-Blue Nic was carrying the baby EXACTLY as shown by that model. Also, Camila (MM's gf) uses the same brand of sling for baby Levi. And guess what, she carries the sling "low" just like NK. http://growingyourbaby.com/2008/09/01/levi-attends-his-first-football-game/

I suggest you check the weather conditions in London with someone in the area. I did! I have friends and colleagues who are on assignment there, and they have confirmed for me that the weather that day was warm enough for the baby to wear short sleeves.

casse role ... I'm sure you'll get a response when you learn to spell someone's screen name correctly.

Urban Myths said...

I have friends and colleagues who are on assignment there

But, OF COURSE, you do! *wink* *wink*

the weather that day was warm enough for the baby to wear short sleeves.

And why was the babymomma wearing a wool coat and a hat?

Sonora_Melody said...

UM... wink all you want!
"And why was the babymomma wearing a wool coat and a hat?"

... you can ask the same question of the performers and concertgoers at this year's CMA festival who were clad in tight leather jackets, cowboy boots and hats in that sweltering heat while the majority were wearing lightweight shirts and cutoff jeans.

You can keep winking, just don't let your eyelashes fall off. I'm on my way to London myself. :)

hoosierlady said...

Anorexics get cold.

Their hair also falls out.

Hoosier Lady, M.D.

Sonora_Melody said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sonora_Melody said...

Are those intials for ...

Mainly Delusional?
Major Disaster?
Manic Depressive?
More Doodoo?

I wonder. :-)

Imahick said...

I actually have a family member staying in London. She said it was Ok...light jacket weather. She confirmed the 12-20 degree C weather (which is 52-68 degrees F) I don't think I'd have a 3 mo. old baby out in short sleeves and no hat in that weather.

Of course I wouldn't be wearing a wool coat and hat myself, but I don't have ice water running through my veins. Nor am I anorexic.

Perhaps I will take you up on the "reporting" side of things, if she stayed in one place long enough. I'll have to find out who you contact in the UK...

She's a real winner. In the recent picture of her kissing the baby, I swear she's sucking the life out of her! I honestly have never seen a woman look so completely unnatural and awkward with a baby, let alone her own child, in my life.

doublewide said...

She's a real winner. In the recent picture of her kissing the baby, I swear she's sucking the life out of her! I honestly have never seen a woman look so completely unnatural and awkward with a baby, let alone her own child, in my life.


so true! she looks like she's never held a baby. awkward is an understatement.

hoosier, you're crackin me up.....

IMO all of the pics just scream PHOTO OP......she's ridiculous


doublewide, ph.d

ecoaster70 said...

Here's a link to some more photos taken on this day. You can not tell me she didn't know those photographers were there. These photos were actually taken at Abbey Road studios, not a hotel. The paps just happen to find her there?

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/gallery/0,22056,5034797-5010141-1,00.html

I saw a scan of an Australian paper & it had a blow up of picture #1. You can clearly see her eyes staring straight at whoever took the pic. Check out picture #4, have you ever seen a stranger kiss? It's not even a kiss. But she's making sure she's doing this just as she steps out of the building. Gives the photogs a great shot.

No more photos yet this weekend. Wonder if she got a talking to about showing the baby's face.

Regarding the weather that day, thanks to the internet you can actually see what the actual weather conditions were that day. As Imahick correctly stated, the temps were in the low to mid 60's. It was also cloudy & the winds were between 8-11 mph, probably making it feel cooler.

Choice said...

Even the Australian papers today have referenced the amount of international bloggers questioning the choice of clothing for Sundae. I'm surprised they didn't comment on her constant black attire every time she is out. WHat's with the cap all the time. Is her hair that bad now?
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/

Sonora_Melody said...

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/gallery/0,22056,5034797-5010141-1,00.html

This series of photos show they were taken at a carpark. Nic was carrying Sunday to/from the car, contrary to what some here would like to think they were walking around town.

Also to those here who wondered why photos showed Nic and Sunday were all by themselves ....well, they weren't alone. Check out the photos of what look like the nanny (?) and bodyguard.

And to those skeptics and NK haters who asked why the paps seem to know where they were ... well, it's very simple if the paps are watching them 24x7. Just check out this A-list star who was being followed/stalked by the paps recently when she was in LA. Unfortunately for her, she gave the paps EXACTLY what they were looking for ... catching celebs lashing out or behaving badly.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=636345

Choice said...

Senora Melody - do you mind I ask what country you live in? Is it Australia?
Thanks, Choice
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/

Sonora_Melody said...

It's my CHOICE not to answer such question. :)

ecoaster70 said...

If Kidman is being hounded 24/7, why was it that it was close to 3 weeks with absolutely no photos? It wasn't until the Mr Mom comment was made that we started getting the pictures. A London morning show host saw them out for dinner last Tuesday night, there were no photos then. Kidman went to the Madonna concert a few weeks ago, how come there weren't photos of her going to that? If she were being hounded 24/7 there would be a lot more photos during the week and not just these staged photo-ops. And if she were being hounded 24/7, why would she be smiling directly at the paps? She certainly doesn't seem to mind being hounded by them does she?

I find it interesting too that one of the photo agencies named on all of these photos is Flynet. What a coincidence.

hoosierlady said...

If she, (they) do not want to be spotted, why the ridiculous costumes? It's crazy, it's like a big bulls eye every time they go out.

I pick. . . . Mainly Delusional!!!!!

Now that that is taken care of, I need to go dress in my black pants, black shirt, black shoes, black cap, and pick a scarf to accessorize. Oh dear. . . so many choices, so little time.

Thanks!!!!!

hoosierlady said...

What do you mean she was in Abbey Road Studios?

This woman was in the same place as Lennon and McCartney, Ringo, George?


Please tell me this isn't so.

I may really have to dress in black.

Imahick said...

Do we know when these pictures were taken? I wonder if Keith was there recording or was she recording her tracks for Nine? God, I can't wait to hear her breathy thin voice singing on the big screen. It'll make my ears bleed again, just like when I heard her in Moulin Rouge. Good times! LOL

doublewide said...

well, i for one, won't be attending Nine...so no worries here. MR was enough to make a person pull her hair out! barf!

if NK doesn't want the paps, then why doesn't she ever appear indignant that they're there? keith sure does. and i find it questionable behaviour that NK shows the baby's face with Keith no where around.

He's in Nashville playing the Grand Ole Opry.....could she have not waited til his obedient little butt flies back to London like a good little boy is supposed to?

the baby is so cute, and i genuinely feel for the child.

rememberwhen said...

Keith is recording in Nashville. That is what he said last night.

Imahick said...

Yes...I heard the interview with Keith. But for the Painful CD, he did some recording in London. I wondered if he had been doing some recording in the UK, as well as in Nashville. If he is going to finish his album before the end of 08, he'll need to do more than a day here and there, when he isn't required back in London to carry NK's water bottle.

I am doubtful he will be spending more than a few days in Nashville if his extraordinary wife is in the UK, showing off their child to the paps.

don't believe the lies said...

I feel for this kid! Sorry but 50-60 degrees requires a jacket at least on a newborn. The bodyguard and the other lady, nanny or not, are wearing long sleeves and jackets. I'd say new mothers are usually paranoid about this sorta thing but she's been a mother before right? Isn't that laughable. Some people should not be allowed to have kids (bought or otherwise) and she is a prime example of that!

Imahick said...

Yes...this child should have at least had a blanket around her, if not a little jacket or sweater and hat.

But how could you see her head and her little arms if she was covered up? NK's already played that "showing the baby all covered up" game... It was time for more exposure and so, she needed to make sure the paps knew this was a baby. Not a doll...a real little "thing."

Honestly...this woman is so transparent. This was the time to "reveal" the baby's face, silence the "fake baby" rumors and show everyone how loving NK is toward the baby she's yearned for (yet left to go back to work 4 wk after her birth). Some people ate it up ... those who really saw what was going on are not buying it and are concerned for the baby.

People don't take 3 month old babies out in the fall without a blanket or a jacket & a hat. It's ridiculous to justify it. It makes anyone who defends her sound stupid.

abc said...

nicole has said that because of her pale skin being a strawberry blonde/redhead she absolutely can not have the sun EVER touch her skin even for a mo' - hence the hats always ... now, her little Strawberry Sundae would surely also need full protection from the sun ... ALWAYS, just like matching mommy dearest

sorry, just can't help the sarcasm

wastedemotion said...

"even for a mo" was that a freudian slip, or just plain ole hilarious!!!!!!!!!!
As for Sunday and the half face pics, big woopdedo.........I'd have much preferd "see" her in her daddy's arms. He's got to miss her and I dont know how he's gonna manage to be away from her (Sunday I mean), unless of course she isnt his. What do we have one picture of him with her, maybe two? How many do we have of nic, too many. As for the attire, I was always told to dress my baby the same as me no more no less, so if Nicole had on long sleeves and a coat, Sunday should have as well. She could have wrapped a blanket around Sunday's arms and still shown her face.
As for you RC and Sonora, do you get your jollies coming to this site, cause for the life of me I cant come up with any other reason for you to torture yourself.

Lisa said...

Now ppl are downright saying this baby has nothing to do with him.

We can tell from the way Keith has been lately and the way she has been acting with this child that there are some serious things going on.

Last month, Keith was seen at the same hotel he uses all the other times he was up to no good. We saw the old Keith at Fashion Rocks. I'd say she is using the child against him already.

The baby wont look like Keith simply because she says so.

Nicole you are nothing more than a Fecking CLOWN!! You have had to reach so far in desperation to for a few more strokes to stay afloat.

Wanna know how Keith really feels? We dont have to go far. She is treating him the same way she treats people like us.

biteme said...

hoosierlady said...
Anorexics get cold.

Their hair also falls out.

Hoosier Lady, M.D.

So true! Thanks for the laugh!

notaclue said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
notaclue said...

Does anyone know what happened to Keith's first girlfriend, Laura? I often wonder if she's still in Nashville & what she thinks about KUNK. The only thing that I've heard of her is when KUNK was getting married and she was quoted as saying that it wouldn't last. It seems that she should know KU pretty well since she was with him so long....

Choice said...

Dear Urban Myth bloggers. Don't forget time is running out to vote for Nicole's most rotten tomato movie. One day left! Make your vote count. Visit the following blog now. A brand new Poll starts soon:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/

notachance said...

Well, I didn't think anything was missing from Keith's Opry performance, except for maybe revealing a new song. His voice sounded good, and he even sounded country on the Hank tune with Marty. Wondering if he was Marty's choice to celebrate his birthday at the Opry? Or was that just happenstance?

notachance said...

One other thing - last night while watching Desperate Housewives the new trailer for Oztralia came on. I have to say, this could actually be her role of a lifetime.

Sorry ladies, but I am looking forward to this movie.

cynicalbeautiful said...

After reading all of the comments on here..I changed my mind..you are absolutely right..Nicole isn't responsible for what the baby is wearing..who is?..the Nanny, of course..silly us for thinking otherwise..wink..wink

Imahick said...

I agree about Keith's performance on the Opry. It was good. He looked alive and happy. It was a nice contrast to the misery that he exudes when leading his princess around in the death grip.

He and Marty have gone back a long time...having appeared together a few times. The last one I can remember was at the Ryman in 2005. Who knows if Marty wanted this, or if this was a good opportunity for the OPRY to get a big name star to celebrate Marty's birthday and get some ratings.

As far as Australia, I don't dislike the look of the movie. It is not my type of film, but it sounds like alot of effort and money has been invested in it. I honestly don't see it doing well in the US, but I think it will do well in Oz and overseas. We'll see. She is so breathy and awkward looking, I find it hard to believe she'll pull this off, but she would fit the arrogant socialite caught in the outback, looking out of place part.

realitycheck said...

notachance, I saw the new trailer on YouTube. I think it does a much better job than the first of showcasing all the elements, while still conveying that magic romantic feel of a Baz film.

maclen said...

imahick said...
"As far as Australia, I don't dislike the look of the movie. It is not my type of film, but it sounds like alot of effort and money has been invested in it. I honestly don't see it doing well in the US, but I think it will do well in Oz and oversea."

Well, the "yaysayers" claim that Golden Compass was a hugh "SUCCESS" because of its overseas grosses, despite it's lackluster US grosses...which then must explain the "full steam ahead on the sequels to cash in on that monster francise! Australia is a simple Oz Tourist Board endeavor, to which the baz sold his heart and soul to... and so the film will certainly be treated as such come release time...

Choice said...

I heard Keith had a look-a-like. When I saw it I thought "why didn't I think of that". And they both love country music too. I am sure you will all agree:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/

realitycheck said...

Funny, Billy Ray was the one who decided to copy KU's look when it was time for a comback. Same thing with Darryl Worley. Unfortunately for DW, the ick factor was through the roof on that attempt. The "Nothin' But A Love Thang" video turned my stomach.

hoosierlady said...

Billy Ray's "I Want My Mullet Back".

I haven't heard it, but I can only imagine.

I'm hoping to make it all the way through the rest of my life without hearing Billy Ray sing anything, and please, no mullet.

I can't believe I'm typing this, but Reality, I think you may be on your way to a degree of your own.

maclen said...

So, had a laugh over the the russell crowe quote kidman told him after visiting and seeing his son... she "believes in arranged marriages"... insinuating with her daughter and his son... certainly fits into kidman's lalaland delusional fantasy world. In kidman's fogging and always manipulating PR hatching mind, I have no doubt she just imagines in precisly 18 years she will throw the glitzest, most spectacular hollywood weddings between a couple of aussie lovebirds that she also forsees can rival the highest "royal unions" the world has ever seen! That, in her mind, will get her back onto the main cover of People and Vanity Fair...for that desperate comeback she no doubt is beginning to see so clearly with each passing day...

hesaweiner said...

Choice- where is snory from? In America we don't use the term car park. Then again lotsa crazy nutters of KUNK often start saying crap like mum and matey etc So who knows. Suddenly they are Aussie wannabees.

Sonora_Melody said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sonora_Melody said...

hesaweiner whiner ..
Aussies are NOT the only ones to use the term carpark.

As to "saying crap like mum" ... that's how Keith calls his mother. :)

Choice said...

Hesaweiner - not sure where Snory is from, she wouldn't answer my question. But I have a feeling it is Antartica. Anyway, check the Blog to see what the winner is for Nicole's most rotten movie! Thanks for all your votes. And don't forget to vote on the new poll, which starts today on:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/

Sonora_Melody said...

Antartica would be a better CHOICE than the loony colony of the skeptics and haters. :)

A440 said...

Please, everybody, ease up on "arranged marriage" statement. As much as I dislike Kidman -- and I do dislike her -- she made that comment in a vain attempt to be cutesy.

I'm not surprised people misconstrue it: the joke fell flat. It was an attempt at humor by a woman known for being utterly humorless.

hoosierlady said...

I watched a rerun of the Opry performance last night.

I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry is one of my all time favorite songs, did they not practice together before they sang? It was like Marty didn't know what Keith was singing and vice versa. Did they not run through who was supposed to do the harmony?

EEEEEKKKKK! Poor Hank, he probably rolled in his grave.

doublewide said...

totally agree hoosierlady......they obviously didn't practice a lick.

ewwwwwwwwwww and eeeeeeeeeeek is right

wonder if keith got there at the last minute, or he just doesn't give a rip

notachance said...

I would say they each rehearsed separately and then did a run-through day of show.

realitycheck said...

I have to laugh because it seems people don't know how to read interviews anymore. They only see the printed word and can't see the humor, sarcasm, or whatever context that's behind it. That is the danger of a joke in print. But its clear to me the general public's comprehension and thinking skills are just going downhill. And then the media runs with it, like that waterfall story. Hello people, Nicole was not being serious. Has no one heard the expression "there's something in the water"???

choice, you really need to get out more, soak up some world culture, and experience things outside the good ole US of A. Millions in and outside of Australia will be glad to know their vernacular is "crap".

TexasCourtJester said...

"You really need to get out more, soak up some world culture, and experience things outside the good ole US of A.

Wow, how insulting to the millions of people in the US who, due to work and family commitments, cannot leave the country. Many more cannot afford, time and/or monetarily, to travel the world and become "cultured". Not everyone has a sugar momma like Keith so we can travel the world, have nannies raise our kids for us, and only work one day a week.

Sonora_Melody said...

"TexasCourtJester said...
"You really need to get out more, soak up some world culture, and experience things outside the good ole US of A.

Wow, how insulting to the millions of people in the US who, due to work and family commitments, cannot leave the country. Many more cannot afford, time and/or monetarily, to travel the world and become "cultured"."

Surely you can "get out more" by going to your nearest library to read books, surf the web to get more information about a country and its people, or watch a TV channel with pertinent information about other countries and cultures?

So you think that was "insulting to millions of people in the US", but thought it was okay to insult the millions in the world who use the terms mum, carpark, etc?

Choice said...

Hi there Reality Check: I don't actually recall mentioning where I live. But it isn't America. I also don't recall even mentioning the "something in the water" thing. Even I could see that Nicole was 'attempting' to use humour - since seven other women on the Australia set got pregnant too. I only made mention of "Nicole approving of arranged marriages" because it was just too good to not comment on. I don't really care if she said it or not. Nicole plays with the media every day so you never know for sure what is real or what is not. As many bloggers have pointed out, she creates stories to gain attention. If people misread things or makes fun of when she is being serious, then it is her own fault. That's what they get for being fame seekers. I think what is more interesting is the fact that NK workshippers insist on visting these blogs. Why is that? Is that because the truth that is often represented here hurts for you? Why dont you just stick with your own sites.

wastedemotion said...

Aw come on RC you didnt see the humor in the word "crappy?!" You didnt see the sarcasm?!
Take heed of your own advice to step out of your sheltered life and get some culture, or just take a long walk if you know what I mean!