Friday, February 20, 2009

A good cause for anyone else is just free PR for Mrs. Urban

Nicole is listed as one of the co-chairs for "THE" Oscar party. That is the Elton John AIDS party held after the Oscars on February 22. Add this to her recent plea for victims of the fires in the homeland and you can see how much Nicole cares. You can, can't you? Can't you? Good! Because like everything she does it has little to do with the charity and more about Nicole Urban doing the charity work. I see you critics are already getting your keyboards set to tell Urban Myths that we are wrong. We are misjudging Nicole; that she cares. And, yes the amount that she and Keith gave, while paltry, was tied up in other issues like taxes and people on the payroll. Save it. Nicole only does what will keep her in the press and right now with her film career in the toilet, her marriage not being all that exciting to the press, and her late in life motherhood being a yawn, Nicole is reinventing herself as do-gooder.

Now there are many Hollywood people who do good work. Sir Elton, Angelina, Mrs. Urban's former lovers Crowe and Clooney. But for someone who has been in the business for this long to not be associated with some cause makes all of us suspect. Why do good works all of a sudden? Before you start in about her work with the Children's Hospital in Sydney and the UN work, let’s just remember that she only uses those for her own self promotion. Generally when she has a product to sell we hear about either.

Why now? Could it be her husband rubbing off on her? Even when not as wealthy as he is today, Keith Urban has worked or donated time or materials to causes - Farm Aid, St. Jude’s, Katrina charities, cancer charities and Musicares. Long before the rest of the world knew him, Keith Urban gave back. So did Nicole pick this up from him? Probably not. Nicole does not consider Keith in anything she does. Even in the wildfire plea if you watch the video with the sound turned off and only watch Keith you can see when she says the amount that is being donated his face turns white and he is shocked. Because drop-out farm boy that he is, even Keith Urban knows you don't announce the amount that you are giving. How stupid was that because Nicole, while being praised, is also being criticized for the small amount it was. Seems that if you are going to do good you simply do it and keep your mouth shut. But Mrs. Urban got the press didn't she? Nicole will also be at the Oscars and less of a joke than what she should be. It seems that she is playing a new game now.

Did you find it interesting that when push comes to shove Nicole will never go directly against her one true love? It seems that with both her current husband and her one true love in the same place at the same time Mrs. Urban could have had a field day. But she stayed in a hotel with her infant daughter. Why? Perhaps it had nothing to do with the two men who supposedly shared her bed but more to do with the young man who spent time with both of those men. Was Nicole staying in the background because of Connor? I would place my bet on that.

44 comments:

Choice said...

Nicole has no shame. After dishing out that recent flop, you would think she would stay away from the Oscars. What real purpose has she there? Give the horse hair a break Nicole, and spend the night with Sunday. Still, it would be funny if she was up there on stage to present the Best Actress Award. And even more funnier if she had to hand it to Kate for "The Reader". What a treat that would be.

Anyway, here is my tribute to the Oscars this Monday:

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/02/exciting-oscars-2009-fine-actresses.html

maclen said...

Oh, dont even get me started on kidman's pathetic PR charity! I am tempted to re-re-repeat her shabby history! So...this elton john co-chairing...is this kidmans first year...is she only now deciding to jump on that bandwagon? The true mark of a shameless pr charity monger is the list of castoff charitys that a pitiful dreck of a celeb loser...like kidman...will just conviently jump from one charity group to another...to whichever will keep her at the relevant partys. I mean, does anyone remember or recall anything whatsoever of her work for her "cancer foundation?" Her career is over...so get a sad excuse to not only get a photo op by attending an oscar party...but simply attach your name to it...ie; "United Nations Secretary-General's Campaign to End Violence Against Women... and NOT kidman's campaign, she simply attached her name to it. There are many reasons kidman is a failure in the film biz...this is only one example of her patently disingenous and phoney persona that simply does not attract very much respect or admiration...at least not enough to keep her films from bombing!

our lady of sorrows said...

"But she stayed in a hotel with her infant daughter."

http://turn-lane.blogspot.com/2009/02/first-keith-urban-then-online-chat.html

The highlight of the morning has been Keith Urban's
appearance in the media center. Instead of just doing
a press conference, he came in and did two songs and
took question. He sang the old America song "Sister Golden Hair,"
took some questions, and then sang "Sweet Thing," his own new song.

Unlike a lot of people who make a living in the music business
these days, this guy can carry a tune and he plays the guitar
well. It was actually cool and he seems like a nice guy. Nicole Kidman
was in the room, too,
and somebody asked Urban what his favorite
racing movie is. Kidman, of course, was in "Days of Thunder" with
her ex-husband, Tom Cruise, who also is here at the track today.

Hope Don't Float said...

"Nicole Kidman
was in the room, too"

Another BS blog supporting Kidman's whereabouts. She was sitting in a room full of media people - yet none of them reported that she was in the room with them. I can't believe the lies people make up.

bstnactrs said...

"I see you critics are already getting your keyboards set to tell Urban Myths that we are wrong. We are misjudging Nicole; that she cares."


Not a critic...I am actually a skeptic but this I can let go and and say that it doesn't bother me at all...in fact, at least they gave something.

I don't believe for one second that she cares about anyone other than herself...but...


"...the amount that she and Keith gave, while paltry, was tied up in other issues like taxes and people on the payroll."

No, the amount they gave isn't tied up or they wouldn't be able to give it.

This obviously has come from my posts on other boards...as an actress myself I did feel the need to point out that simply b/c a celeb is reported to be worth millions doesn't mean that those millions are sitting in the bank and they can write checks against it...it IS tied up in lots of other things. That is the truth.



"Now there are many Hollywood people who do good work. Sir Elton, Angelina, Mrs. Urban's former lovers Crowe and Clooney."

True, but those who are actually getting down & dirty are few and far between and the truth is that MOST celebs do not donate anywhere near the amounts that they could based on what they are worth so, IMO Keith & Nicole are no different in that respect...I guess that is why this doesn't bother me - although, I will say that it was really tacky to say exactly how much she gave - I think she thought we'd be impressed.


"But for someone who has been in the business for this long to not be associated with some cause makes all of us suspect."

Ah, but she is and has been for quite some time...just b/c it's for PR and not REALLY for charity doesn't mean she has no associations - she does. The Children's Hosptial mentioned below, Unifem,, breast cancer, the ironic violence against women campaign...these ARE associations.

I think the terms you mean are ACTIVE PARTICIPATION and INVOLVEMENT.

Are they sincere associations like Angelina's? No.


For those iof you who know me, you know I am no NK fan by any stretch of the imagination however, no matter what the reasons for donating the amount of money they did, that money was added to all of the rest of the money donated and it went to help those people.

At the end of the day, that's all that matters to me.


Bstn

Imahick said...

I agree about the donation. It was tacky to say how much, but the donation was still a generous enough amount and it is needed! I'll cut them some slack in that regard.

I think lots of celebs lend their name to charitable causes to generate some positive press for themselves. NK is one of them. Keith has actually worked with St. Judes for a long time and so, I respect that. I don't know enough about NK's relationship with the Sydney Children's Hospital ... I didn't like the photo op with her kids on the day before the wedding in Oz. It was also tacky, in my view.

As far as where she was during the NASCAR race...if NK was there, we'd have pictures. If she was at the press conference, we'd see pictures. I suspect that she was either hiding in the hotel ... trying to avoid any rucus with the X ... at home feeding her goats and chasing the wild turkeys on the farm ... or in LA, getting ready for her Malibu Vogue photoshoot. She looked horrible in the pictures that I saw, so she should have gone to LA about 2 months ago to get ready.

our lady of sorrows said...

HEY HOPE DON'T FLOAT!


http://turn-lane.blogspot.com/2009/02/first-keith-urban-then-online-chat.html

This is the official blogger of NASCAR, not a blog of a Kidman fan. Check it out before you comment next time. You people look stupid enough as it is.

A440 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
realitycheck said...

Our lady, just brush it off. You're getting the standard pre-packaged pre-approved response by the head skeptics ..."it's fake". Believe me there are certain posters who run the show so to speak and if you don't fall in line they run you out of town.

They want the public to think Nicole has EVERYONE in her pocket and she has more money than God, or is that Bill Gates LOL, to keep them silent year after year. But with that theory, there's just too many people with her secrets. I'm not buying it and I'm sure you don't either.

And thanks for the blog. At the end of the day I don't care if she was there or not because it really doesn't matter. Its the skeptics that want to make a HUGE issue out of everything.

maclen said...

Hilarious..."our lady of sorrows?" The perfect die hard kidman fansie, and perfect title for a follower of the self absorbed and self proclaimed martyr... boo hoo...she was dumped by cruise...horrors!! "Her life now rings with a veil of morose uncertainty and a feeling of impending dread." So, just another striken refugee from the land of NKusers...an overly sensitive and raw nerved devotee suffering from cold sweats at the utter failure of an over hyped, untalented hack? Or just another tired sock puppet for the two kidman heckle and jeckles of the Urban Myths board ...who both mysteriously fade away from the board after her movie is a flop for months...and then suddenly they both "reappear" at the exact same time to attempt to sleigh the kidman vanquishers? LIke i said...HILARIOUS!

maclen said...

Hilarious..."our lady of sorrows?" The perfect die hard kidman fansie, and perfect title for a follower of the self absorbed and self proclaimed martyr... boo hoo...she was dumped by cruise...horrors!! "Her life now rings with a veil of morose uncertainty and a feeling of impending dread." So, just another striken refugee from the land of NKusers...an overly sensitive and raw nerved devotee suffering from cold sweats at the utter failure of an over hyped, untalented hack? Or just another tired sock puppet for the two kidman heckle and jeckles of the Urban Myths board ...who both mysteriously fade away from the board after her movie is a flop for months...and then suddenly they both "reappear" at the exact same time to attempt to sleigh the kidman vanquishers? LIke i said...HILARIOUS!

maclen said...

...ps...

...hey, just a thought, on the subject of kidman's actual JJ and GG sponsored photo op in the quise of a "Nine cast photo shoot" which seem to barely show her castmates hudson and "Oscar supp. actress" cruz. So what are the odds that kidman joins hudson and cruz to present together on the oscars? For surely kidman MUST have certainly noticed after the crushing flop that was "Australia"...that people...the industry pundits and talking heads as was evident...are thoroughly fed up with her and were bashing her for her failure...and a more "comforting" platform for her at this years oscars is to be flanked with other celebs, for cover, and moral support onstage?
She usually presents by herself...she doesnt like to have anyone taking the spotlight away from her on stage, you know. I can just imagine kidman calculating to get hudson and cruz, with help of course from kidman svengali weinstein, to get them to submit for , quote, the good of their next film... And perhaps that gives credence to the stories flying on the nets that tomkat will be skipping the oscars...ex's kidman and cruz on stage together, and the thought of a "broadway aussie oscars" may be too much for cruise to stomach!

realitycheck said...

maclen you must have a very inflated opinion of yourself and the skeptics if you think it truly matters when or if we post here. It doesn't validate this blog's views one bit because the truth is the truth. If all of you went unchallenged it still wouldn't change my opinion. My real life in the real world is more important than reading your run-on sentences and diarrhea of the mouth responses.

Our lady, come back any time, but on your terms, only when you want to. The reality is that posters who care so much when others show up here know they are on shaky ground to begin with. Conspiracy theories and finger pointing instead of actual facts are just futile diversions.

cricket said...

That would be great if Old Nic had to present the best actress award to Kate Winslet for The Reader. I can just see Kate trying to pry it out of Nikker's bony red claws.

maclen said...

cricket said...
"That would be great if Old Nic had to present the best actress award to Kate Winslet for The Reader. I can just see Kate trying to pry it out of Nikker's bony red claws."

Yes, cricket, that would be one satisfying moment for us lucid kidman exposers, to see her present the award to winslet for the role in the Reader...but of course the oscar's tradition is for last years winner to present this years winner...that is unless the "revamped" and mildly "secretive" oscar telecast changes even that up. As for the youtube video of jackman prancing around in top hat and "shiney sequined vest" trying his darnest to do his best bob fosse...nothing like a shot of that good ol' Broadway to get those youtubers to check out the telecast...and I'm sure if kidman was to come in "feline makeup" screeching like a bansee from a scene right out of "Cats"... that will no doubt bring down the house! And if only the bazz can come up with a showstopper of a "vaudville" act...with lemmon pies in the face and spritzing selzer, they may just sooth the spirits of al jolson, buster keaton and fatty arbuckle to just pull it off...and bring in that coveted 24-35 demo... yeah boy...that would surely drive the audience "kookie"...and maybe even get a coveted sinatra-esque, "man, that swings baby!"

Choice said...

I personally feel that Gran is going to use the Oscars to make an announcement about the upcoming DVD release. She is hoping for a fresh market. Maclen, I just know you will be first in line to buy your copy:

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-poll-warning-dvd-is-coming.html

Lisa said...

I really want to raise a question about the baby names. Was anything ever found about the hidden meaning behind Suro and Suri? If SURO stands for Sunday Rose...then SURI stands for Sunday Rise? I believe a Sunday Rise is very holy in Scientology, but I know it would be many other places in many forms so that's not saying much specifically.

I'm wondering how a name they chose could be giving an attempted 'one-up' to Tom/Kat, as they are always trying to do?

Does anyone KNOW anything?? I'm tired of seeing Keith's baby called SurO, without an explanation.

You cannot say it's just the way to abbreviate her name in a fun way and it just so happens to match Suri and she just so happens to be the child of Tom/Katie..... nope there's gotta be more....

hoosierlady said...

Lisa,

Who is abbreviating the name that way?

maclen said...

Choice said...
"I personally feel that Gran is going to use the Oscars to make an announcement about the upcoming DVD release. She is hoping for a fresh market. Maclen, I just know you will be first in line to buy your copy:"

Ha! Well, I'm sure it'll be the "highest selling dvd" ever released, choice! And as for kidman appearing at the oscars...I just saw this piece at nikki finkes...

http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/oscars-crisis-hollywood-frustrations-and-fears-over-sundays-awards-stars-and-advertisers-give-show-cold-shoulder/

OSCARS CRISIS! Hollywood Frustrations And Fears Over Sunday's Awards; Stars And Advertisers Give Show Cold Shoulder

...which claims actors are turning down the chance to present this year because theyr'e worried the show is gonna suck...and claims kidman turned down a chance to present because to quote finke in this piece..."For instance, Kidman said she (won't) appear onstage without the "right" hairdresser..." Well first, I seriously doubt kidman would not want to appear because she's worried the show will suck...(she's never had a problem with releasing film after film that totally sucked!) so im not buying that...as for the she wont appear without "The "right" hairdresser, although I know what finke is insinuating...(wig, extensions)..since when do actress's arrive at the awards with unmade hair? So either kidman is a no show, to which I say good riddence and can at least enjoy a kidman-less oscars...or she will appear, and perhaps present, as I speculated, with or without next film co-stars hudson and cruz...we shall see...stay tuned...

Choice said...

That's hysterical Maclen. Kidman won't present unless the right hairdresser can be assigned to her. What hair is she referring to? What she means is the person who usually glues the extensions in, is on holidays and is non contactable. Obviously Gran is unaware that people are onto her mane (she wouldnt be making comments like that otherwise). I'm hoping you are right ... she won't turn up! But what about the free white wine at the after-party? She could just wear her black cap on stage and tell everyone she was running late and came straight from the Gym.

maclen said...

Well, chice, obviously that would be her point of attaching herself to elton john's Aids oscar party as a "co-chair" of the party, if in fact she is not presenting... she wont do the red carpet, will not get onstage to present? Well, she at least will get oscar glow PR with the much desired photo ops from the party. But that would make sense...at this low point in her career...she would prefer to "shmooze" with the industry insiders at a private party for a little image rehabilitation than do the carpet and walk on stage, where it is clear, as I wrote before, every on is just fed up with her usual and dull "loitering...

maclen said...

Aha...so kidman didnt have to have weinstein corral hudson and pen cruz to present with her...she had loren...berry...maclaine and cotillard to help for cover...and of course kidman's presentation of jolie was cold, monotinous and utterly without any emotion or passion... (watch the video of it tommorrow and see how the other actress's had some kind of passionate and emotional hook.) And wow, winslets speech was dignified and whimsical and down to earth...the shout out to her dad to whistle so she'd know where he was was priceless...compared to kidman's painfully herkey jerkey overdone and flat acceptance speech, winslets was miles above in emotional feeling and composure.

maclen said...

...ps...

...and speaking of shout outs, the worst has to be jackman's shout out for kidman's "cinematic soulmate" the bazz's gagging and tired mishmash of grease/cabaret/...and etc...(I quit listen after about a minute)..."Musicals are back!" number. The ridiculousness of it was compounded by jackman's and beyonce's obvious lip sinking.

maclen said...

...pps...

...and one last thought...to the kidman fansies, who also thought Australia was really a "smashing" success... host jackman's most lucid joke of the night...paraphrasing... on how to be a success in the oscar race..."british" winslet plays a german in the reader: nominated. 'American" downy jr plays an aussie, playing a back man in tropic thunder: nominated. And then...the "australian" jackman, (himself), playing an australian, in the film titled "Australia": hosting!

maclen said...

...ppps...


...so another note tonight...just noticed that, naturally, and on schedule...kidman photo op flunky JJ has the first photos of kidman presenting on the show.

http://justjared.buzznet.com/2009/02/23/nicole-kidman-pays-tribute-to-angelina-jolie/

Kidman pays tribute to angelina

See, although JJ has photos of both nominated brangelina...and of the other nom presenters...it is kidman who gets on the title...first! Not surprised at all that kidman brought the justjared photographer to the oscars with her...instead of the worthless orb!

CHOICE said...

Congratulations Nicole on the award you won at the Oscars (new category):

http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/02/nicole-wins-worst-actress-oscars-2009.html

not anon said...

Did KUNK even show up for Elton's party? What was with all the stupid hand holding when they walked off the stage after Kate got her award? Kidman needing emotional support because she was so brave to step on the stage to present after her dream role was mocked the word over and Kate won for the role it seems she was fired from?

maclen said...

not anon said...
"Did KUNK even show up for Elton's party?"

Yeah I was also wondering that as well...GettyImages has over 300pics of the event...and not one includes kidman...most likely the charity opportunist kidman had her name "attached" to the AIDS charity event to exploit it for good press, then simply skipped the event to party out at weinstein's or the VAnity fair parties. So, which parties did kidman attend, exactly? I cant find anything myself...so was kdiman keeping a low profile because she skipped the AIDS event?

SkepticRN said...

http://oscars.movies.yahoo.com/photos/85-oscars-fashion-report-card?nc#OmgPhoid=26


I think they hit the nail on the head here.

not anon said...

Maclen - KUNK hit up the Vanity Fair party. There's a lot of pictures of her on line looking a little bit like smegal from Lord of the Rings. I don't get why the Academy keeps using her as a presenter. She's only been nominated twice with one win in 20 + years of acting.

CHOICE said...

The only photo of Keith is with Nicole at the Oscars drinks backstage. He looked a little bored, so took off home before the Big parties began. That photo is here:
http://nicole-kidman-journey.blogspot.com/2009/02/nicole-wins-worst-actress-oscars-2009.html

maclen said...

SkepticRN said...
"http://oscars.movies.yahoo.com/photos/85-oscars-fashion-report-card?nc#OmgPhoid=26
I think they hit the nail on the head here."

That is what it looks like, skepticRN...although I'd say she rolled around on a pile of feathers. Also, dig her "two toned" flesh tones... white...and off white. (arms are white...her chest off white!)

not anon said...
"Maclen - KUNK hit up the Vanity Fair party. There's a lot of pictures of her on line looking a little bit like smegal from Lord of the Rings."

Your right, not anon, went back to gettyImages and checked out the vanity fair pics...yep, she's really "schmoozing" it up isnt she. And your right as well, choice, the orb seems to have slauntered away from the shindig...kidman seems to be flying solo. No doubt talking up every connection... ready to snap up any possible job opportunity...she seems to be talking to designers...perhaps she's trolling for another fashion endorsment...sean penn be damned! BTW...anything from the elton john aids event?

realitycheck said...

not anon, only nominated twice and won once??? Do you realize how many other great actors never get a nom or a win for that matter? That when you do win you are in a very exclusive club? Its an honor as a former winner to be asked to present at the Oscars. She's not going to stay away just because you don't like her. Did you change the channel when she showed up or did you dissect her every word and movement?

I cannot say, why does X actor/actress and former winner get to present? Because they won an Oscar and they have that privilege. And the Academy likes to have past winners give the new winners their awards.

It is funny though. Even if she hadn't been there she still was all over the awards. Her acceptance speech clip, Australia featured in the 2008 Romance tribute and the Moulin Rouge clip during the musical number.

She is not the pariah you want the public to think she is. Not by a long shot.

On a related note, I find the criticism of Kate Winslet by her home country that she is too emotional during her acceptance speeches. Absolutely unbelievable. There must be some sort of disease going round that makes people want to tear others down for any little thing.

CHOICE said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
CHOICE said...

Hi Non Anon
They keep asking Nicole because she will say yes to the publicity and. Reality Check is right that they also ask previous winners to present. But don't expect to see someone like Cher up there anytime soon handing out awards. In fact, I can think of many previous winners who haven't returned to present. Also, I think she reads here from time to time and has seen the comments about her horse hair extensions. Notice she kept the extensions at home this year?

Reality Check - Kate Winslet's speeches are a little long and over the top but she can get away with it because she is richly deserving of her awards. The Poms have knocked her over her BAFTA speech. That speech was hilarious though, the way she forgot Brangelina's name. Good stuff!

Urban Myths said...

How can anyone say this person has class and style?

http://tinyurl.com/auaek8

maclen said...

Urban Myths said...
"How can anyone say this person has class and style?
http://tinyurl.com/auaek8"

Boy, Urban Myths, either her feather dress is shrinking, or she is developing a major "humpback", and I didnt know this years Vanity Fair party had a "come as your favorite "tranny" theme. But her recent "cheek" touch up is really prominent in that lighting...so is it just kidman or is the orb shrinking?

realitycheck said...

Choice you say you're a guy so you might not realize this, but those extensions the way they were worn at the Grammys wouldn't have gone with the Oscar dress no matter what. A dress like that requires a hairstyle with a much shorter length.

There was nothing wrong with any of Kate's speeches. At all. And she's getting crap all over the place now too, for winning for a movie where she slept with a teen, the fact she told Meryl to suck it up etc. etc.

As for Cher not showing up, I don't think she cares or has respect for the Academy. Its her life, her business though.

If the presenters aren't up to your caliber or your liking don't watch.

Lisa said...

"If the presenters aren't up to your caliber or your liking don't watch."

If we are not up to your caliber or your liking... dont read.

Tara said...

Keith looked so happy to be there didn't he? As for Kidman, she is kinda like Micky Rooney she will show up just to remind everyone she won. You didn't see a lot of former winners there because they don't need the hype that is the Oscars. Most people who present have something coming out in the next year or were in something that was a hit in the last year.
Kidman has looked worse and since I don't really think she is beautiful she can't look better.

maclen said...

Tara said...
"Kidman has looked worse and since I don't really think she is beautiful she can't look better."

Funny line, tara...kidman has attended the past 5 out of 6 oscars purely for the PR...to simply remain "on the scene"...despite not being nominated since 2003...she needs the attention or she has no reason to exist...but as has been apparent since she was granted an oscar 6 years ago, her career is dead. So, I just read this article, and all I have to say is, "thats more like it!"

http://www.variety.com/VR1118000481.html

Sean Penn in talks for 'Fair Game'

...also in this Variety piece, it claims naomi watts is now set to play plame, in a role that you may recall the director of this film, Liman, so giddily and fanboyishly confirmed kidman was set to star in last year...

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jumper/news/1708886/doug_liman_talks_valerie_plame_biopic

ws
Doug Liman Talks Valerie Plame Biopic


...quote: "Nicole Kidman. She's perfect if you've ever met Valerie. Nicole was supposed to play Jane Smith in 'Mr. and Mrs. Smith.' We owe a movie together! That's an unrequited thing between me and an actor where I fell in love with them for a role and never get to consummate it."

Calm down there, elmo...you'll no doubt cause yourself to be "premature"..in more ways than one.
So if this is true, and pans out, it makes sense...kidman's clout and pull in film is done...over...and she knew it when Austalia flopped, hence the, "I have no desire to make films" bit...I noticed a few years ago when during the premiere of Compass, kidman had announced that they were in talks to get julia roberts to costar with her in her monroe "millionaire/monte carlo remake...and two years later it is MIA. Which is why I always mockingly highlighted kidman's "PRODUCER" status..none of her so called, "to produce and star in" films will ever see the light of day.

Sonora_Melody said...

"Lisa said...
I really want to raise a question about the baby names."

Suri means thief in Japanese.

"CHOICE said...
But don't expect to see someone like Cher up there"

Why would anyone expect Cher to be at the Oscars last Sunday when she was contractually committed to be somewhere else. http://www.cherlasvegas.net/cher-schedule.htm

" CHOICE said...
The only photo of Keith is with Nicole at the Oscars drinks backstage. He looked a little bored, so took off home before the Big parties began."

You obviously didn't know where to look. I have seen several photos of N&K with Mr. and Mrs. Rupert Murdoch, Keith with Sheryl Crowe, N&K with fashion designer Donna Karan and Calvin Klein, all taken at the Vanity Fair party. I have also seen a few photos of them arriving at the VF party.

Sonora_Melody said...

Clarification to my earlier post:

Suri means pickpocket in Japanese, to be precise.

not anon said...

realitycheck said...
not anon, only nominated twice and won once??? Do you realize how many other great actors never get a nom or a win for that matter? That when you do win you are in a very exclusive club?

Thanks for proving my point - why is it Kidman is always invited back and the other equally worthy woman are not? Hillary Swank and Jodie Foster have won more awards than she has in her career yet they aren't there year after year are they?

And one last thing RC - you really shouldn't get so heat up over these blogs and posts. In the scope of Kidman's life, you and I don't matter. What we say here has no impact on Kidman. Do you really think this woman cares what you or I say be it positive or negative? Why don't you stop wasting your time hating on all of us and do what you tell so many here to do - Get a life. Take your do good underdog defender attitude and help someone who really needs it not a millionaire celebrity.