Saturday, January 19, 2008

How to have a baby, Kidman-style

Kidman wants the world to believe she’s pregnant. She may be, or there is a child being carried somewhere that Kidman and her hired escort/sperm donor will lay claim to as its parents.

Are we happy about this news? Nope, and there will be more about the whys in the coming months. But even if we are disappointed that Keith’s life has been drastically affected by this event, it will be a public event as only Nicole Kidman can carry out. Kidman, who has this supposed history of having difficulty in the maternity department, is working out like an Olympic athlete. Contradiction? Why yes, of course it is. During the public unveiling of the formerly barren womb, the couple were said to be thrilled. Well, of course they are. Both are over 40, both have dubious factors internally that would affect gestation: Kidman with her self-publicized failures to continue to carry a fetus and Urban with his addictions. Was Kidman sure about having that pool joined with hers?

Interesting, isn't it, that we didn't see these two together for more than 35 days, yet in the last week when the great announcement was made, we haven't had a day where they haven't been spotted. Perhaps because Keith just did not look happy enough and Kidman had to have a beaming Keith shot. It took two days after the announcement to get that. And the beam didn't last. Keith looked scared in the concert-going photo op, probably because he wasn't expecting her to tag along or because he had his new best friends, the photographers, there to record every minute they were together. Well, Keith, that’s the plan. We will have so many of these events. Nicole goes to the doctor. Nicole buys stretch mark cream. Keith, who used to be his own person, will be there perhaps carrying her bag. Perhaps he already has his new role assigned, he-man protector of the little delicate woman. The man who will scream at the press that she called, making himself look like an idiot. Kidman who is hoping to achieve sainthood in Oz can just sit back and radiate. Her watch dog is doing his job and she is promoting the fetus and her new film with little criticism. It is indeed going to be a tough six months and if you don't think this story isn't controlled, go to the web and look up some of the stories. Well, get them when they are first out there because almost all of the subsequent accounts have been altered. Gee Nicole, Oz is the perfect setting to have this royal baby. You seem to get what you want. Now you are claiming your paparazzi friends are hounding you and you may have to go into seclusion! Why hide from us? Will we notice the results of your botox-less forehead and shrinking lips? Will we notice that the baby bump looks a little odd? Have you figured out the arrangements yet for the Royal Baby Tour ‘08?? Nicole and the rest of you who thought the skeptics would be gone, we aren't going anywhere. We wouldn't miss this show for the world.

33 comments:

maclen said...

And I especially got a kick out of this past weeks photo op of the kidban seen out in their little tennis outfits, hitting a few tennis balls. And of course, my first reaction was, these are part of the arrainged photo ops that will help give her an explaination or excuse as to why she will lose this kid also. So, expect their next workout photo ops to be of them bungie jumping... or better yet, a few rounds of kick boxing.

doublewide said...

and don't forget maclen, it's all about Austrailia, with the tennis open going on and all. of course, Austrailia just happens to be her next movie....oops flop.(we call it Ugly in the Wind. so why not be seen playing tennis, or at least have pics taken in our little matching white outfits.

keith in that outfit was almost more than i could bear....

Imahick said...

I actually don't think there will be a miscarriage. If she wanted to set that up, I think she'd avoid activity that would set her up for criticism. Heck...the way the media portrays it, she's in training for the 08 Olympics...not an expectant mother in a hi risk pregnancy.

Nope..I don't think there will be a miscarriage. I think there will be a royal baby in 08. Whether she actually IS pregnant, or someone is gestating for her, we will have a tiny Kidman on display later this year. It's all the rage in Hollywood this year, so NK couldn't resist joining in.

don't believe the lies said...

Well I still think that there is no way in hell that she is pregnant. With her "past history" with miscarriages and such one would think she would be at home taking it easy. Instead she's out everyday and now playing tennis?!?! I don't get it? If some bunny/worshipper can explain it to me in a way that makes sense than I might consider it...but I highly doubt that it will happen.

She's suppose to be what 3 months along already? Where's the bump? She should have something by now. There's nothing! This whole thing is a bunch of crap!

Oh and I like the poll!

banbotox said...

I think there will be a baby but she's not the one having it. She will claim it as hers but that's about as close as she will ever get to being a mother.

doublewide-I have to agree, Keith in that outfit was over the top.

doublewide said...

posting to apologize especially to you aussies for mispelling Australia.....and i pride myself on my ability to spell ha!

so sorry

maclen said...

doublewide said...
"and don't forget maclen, it's all about Austrailia, with the tennis open going on and all. of course, Austrailia just happens to be her next movie....oops flop..."

Well, doublewide, I dont know, if her intention is to try and tie this tennis photo op to the Australian open, and then to her movie Australia... i just have to say again, her PR team has the timing of a broken watch. I'm pretty sure the movie doesnt come out till the end of the year, Dec. more than likely... 11 whole months away.

doublewide said...

Well, doublewide, I dont know, if her intention is to try and tie this tennis photo op to the Australian open, and then to her movie Australia... i just have to say again, her PR team has the timing of a broken watch. I'm pretty sure the movie doesnt come out till the end of the year, Dec. more than likely... 11 whole months away.

i wasn't aware it was 11 months....why do you imagine the playing tennis pics, the "going to the zoo" blurb in the press....all of NK's over exercising, etc? do you have any thots, maclen, on what her PR team is up to with these?

doublewide said...

never mind maclen! i just re-read your first post......i guess to explain a miscarriage then....

justmyopinion said...

In response to dontbeleivethelies, while I am not a fan of Nicole, I do believe that she could in fact be carrying a child. As for her now showing at 3 months, she's a tall woman who could very well hide a "bump" as long as 6 months, it happens all the time. I do not believe that they would announce a pregnancy until they knew for certain everything was fine with mother and baby. And do you think that people that have had fertility problems in the past aren't "allowed" to actually conceive? Just because she has had this problem for a long time, doesn't mean that she hasn't wanted to be pregnant. However it happened, I say good for her. She knows what she should and shouldn't be doing to keep her baby safe.

maclen said...

Doublewide, it's pretty obvious that her Pr team is very subpar... and kidman is just a one dimensional and shallow, follow the latest trend celeb. So when she said that she doesnt read the scripts, you can believe she just shows up to the film set and does what shes told, and doesnt have much say in the end product... that is totally believeable. She is a subpar celeb. Ambassador for charity. She is so content to be just an "announced" ambassador, with a dismal record of actual accomplishment. Her rep as a neglectful mother is furthered along by her involvement with deadbeat father steve bing, who not only ignores responsibility for one kid, but to two children... not unlike kidman herself. It's no surprise to anyone who cares to see the actual choices she makes, that she is a failure as a movie star, her pitiful charity work, or as a neglectful parent.

doublewide said...

couldn't agree with you more maclen...on all counts. her choices speak volumes.

i have to admit i go back and forth about her PR team being either brilliant or complete morons...right now i am going with the latter.

don't believe the lies said...

In response to justmyopinion, I never said anything about people being "allowed" to have kids who have had problems in the past. I just don't understand someone with her history of miscarriages would even risk the possibility of anything happening? It makes no sense.

You Said: Just because she has had this problem for a long time, doesn't mean that she hasn't wanted to be pregnant.

Lots of people want things. Doesn't mean that their going to get them. Sorry but I still don't think she's pregnant. It just doesn't add up.

Kackie said...

I have several friends who didn't start showing until late in their 3rd months. It depended on their body shape. So if you're basing all of your theories on that, you're way off.

doublewide said...

well considering NK's manipulation of the pics and her choice of clothing, it would be very difficult to base anything on her "appearance"

maclen said...

And also, doublewide, dont expect kidman to ever just simply clarify when she supposedly concieved. For not only does she have one of the worst public relations team in Hollywood, after leaking the story to the daily mail, and her pr mouthpiece first denied the story, then only a week later confirmed it... she tried to explain that she was not informed about it..So, apparently kidman is incapable of even telling her own paid shill the truth. So then basically, i say what should you believe, the original denial, or the later confirmation?

JapHal said...

Oh for crying out loud.. Shes gona be wearing a pillow soon. In some of those pictures she no bump.. None.. she should have a slight baby bump.. a tinch of a bump.. but she is flat as can be.. I mean Alba has more of abump than she does... and she is due after kidman.. ppppiiiillllloooowwww..

notachance said...

So, I'm wondering what y'all will be saying when non-existant child comes into this world?

Like I said before, when all the skeptic predictions about the length of the marriage didn't come true, you turned it into "oh, if it fails in 5 or 10 yrs our predictions count". Now that they are having a kid you will for sure find every reason to believe that the kid is not in her body and then it will not look like her, etc, etc, etc.

Are y'all this critical of everything in your lives? Or just people you don't know at all?

JapHal said...

notachance.. oh Im sure the baby will come into the world.. Money will buy it all..

don't believe the lies said...

I also wonder why the worshippers think her having a child is a great idea. What about the 2 kids she already has and pays no attention to? Why would her having another one (which I don't think she is) be any different? I think the bunnies/worshippers forget to remember this. She's an awful mother.

She wasn't even there for Connor's 13th birthday last week. If your a loving mother it seems to me that you would do all you could to see your child on their birthday....and 13 is a big one! Instead she's out galavanting all over Oz. Then complaining about it the next day on how she's scared blah, blah, blah!

So you worshippers keep living in the bubble your in where everything is nice and rosy. I will continue to live on the outside and see the woman for the manipulative liar she is!

maclen said...

don't believe the lies said...
"So you worshippers keep living in the bubble your in where everything is nice and rosy. I will continue to live on the outside and see the woman for the manipulative liar she is!"

Yes, thats basically what its about on this blog. Ive basically decided shes a shallow, narcississtic, attention starved, mediocre celeb. who to this point, hasnt dissapointed me as to that opinion. Shes still married to an addict/alcoholic, with a miserable film record, who has a more and more dismal ongoing rep as a miserable mother, who is now trying to keep up with the current trend of pregnant celebs. I'm still comfortable with our point of view, dont believe the lies.

maclen said...

... oh yes, also wanted to add, as ive already said before... although I'm cynical, of course, about this whole "expecting" bit... at least there is one good side effects to it... one less kidman movie to pollute the movie season this coming year.

banbotox said...

maclen said...one less kidman movie to pollute the movie season this coming year.

So true maclen and a God send it is!

There will be a baby...no doubt but is it her's? Of course because she will have paid lots of $$ for it!

BTW-I don't believe the skeptics put the marriage on a timetable at all. We just don't believe the fairytale.

notachance said...

As for her parenting of "Tom's" kids - yes,Tom's kids - I no longer fault her 100% for being absent from their lives. It's pretty clear to me that she has no say in anything to do with those kids.
I don't think it matters where she lives, she still wouldn't get the unlimited amount of time y'all think "a mother should have". Even though "publicly" they have a joint or shared custody, privately, via Scientology, she gets what Tom & the church says what she gets.

You know, I'm not a bunny by any means - but I am practical & logical and base my decisions therein.

cricket said...

I'm still having a really hard time thinking she is pregnant.If there is a baby at all,it's got to be someone else actually doing the work not her.I don't for one minute think she would stretch her stick figure out to carry a baby.She's far to vain.

don't believe the lies said...

IF she really wanted to spend time with the kids she could. For god's sake Scientology isn't the law it's a religion and that cannot stop her from seeing her kids. There are legal papers citing her joint custody. Scientology doesn't over rule that. It's rediculous to think that it would or that Tom has some special powers that stops her from spending time with them. She wanted to adopt those kids she needs to take a little responsibility in raising them. Which she doesn't. Face it she's just an awful mother.

CJ said...

After reading the "Unauthorized Biography" with other examples of one family member deciding to leave the Scientology "church" and the rest of the family completely disconnecting from them maybe Nic isn't completely at fault for not seeing her kids. However, she has chosen to stop fighting to see her kids and she has more money to fight with and gain access to them than most people. She still left them with dad when they were little while she flew off to film. TC was more of a parent to them than she was which is why the kids want to stay with him.

maclen said...

...I just wanted to highlight another very revealing side effect of her whole baby bit. As these latest photo ops clearly show, here:

http://socialitelife.buzznet.com/2008/01/21/nicole_kidmans_knocked_up_botox_free.php

...although she still isnt showing yet, having to lay off the botox, she has certainly transformed just a few weeks ago from oh so smooth and frozen.. to positively aged and elderly looking in the cruel light of day, away from the manufactured lighting of the film sets and red carpets. My only question now is, will the anxiety and sheer terror of having to go cold turkey from the "tox" force her body to cry out and reject the manufactured pr stunt placed in her body... or will it just hasten the announcent that it just didnt work out, in the face...(get it!) of seeing her forehead collapse in front of everybodies eyes? Only time will tell.

Imahick said...

NK made her choices as far as the kids go. She made them while she was still married to Tommy and she's made them since.

At this point, I suspect the kids are luke warm about seeing her. She wasn't there for them as little ones and she has chosen to spend time with HER family and Keith and her career, rather than with her kids. I find it distasteful that she excludes them from her family references...but that's also telling. She doesn't consider her children as part of HER family.

The COS may have influenced the kids to not want to spend time with NK ... but that is a recent occurrence and could have been prevented had she made them a priority in the last few years. She could have moved to LA and lived there and insisted on playing a role in their lives. She could have asserted her legal rights through actually taking custody of them 50% of the time. Instead, she took movie role after movie role, often filming in other countries and certainly not in LA. She spent her down time with her parents, sister, Antonia's kids and Keith, instead of making the kids a priority.

Now she is trying to make it sounds like the COS is keeping her from her kids. BS ... She is the author of her own 'kidless' status ... and it's a sad commentary about a woman who is so obviously self centered and cold, to be able to discard her kids and her rights as a mother so easily.

cricket said...

On the off chance that there actually is a baby she will do the same thing to it.Only this time she won't be able to blame the COS and people will be finally able to face the fact that she is just a cold heartrd selfish self centered bitch.

CJ said...

I've been wondering who will raise this child. I'm sure Keith will as long as he's around. What about after the divorce? I doubt Nic will let him have the child and if the kid biologically isn't his he might not want to take it. I figure Nic will dump the baby on her sister and let her raise it. She has 4, what's one more?

Imahick said...

If you believe the stories about the pre-nup, Keith will have no say about the upbringing of this child when they are divorced. She will have full control. Keith is / was just the sperm donor ... assuming he fulfilled that function.

Of course, her care will be delegated to the team of Nannies who will be required to keep the f'ing child quiet...as NK has been known to scream in the past in regards to Tom's two children. I don't think we have to worry about NK putting too much personal effort into mothering this baby.

Of course, she'll take advantage of the paps for the appropriate photo ops, but when it comes to the 2 am feeds, the colic and the fevers, Nannies will do quite well.

Obviously, this baby will be well cared for from a financial point of view. However, I'm hoping NK finds kind and loving Nannies, or this little person could have a lonely childhood.

jose paolo said...

Thisi s really funny. All you people planning Nicole and Keith's miscarriage, divorce, and the baby's upbringing.

Ever heard of living a life? You people are, im sorry, pathetic.